Capitalism/different meanings: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Simpler I.6. |
Larry Sanger (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
The word ''Capitalism'' is used for many different meanings. |
|||
=== Meanings of the Word "Capitalism" === |
|||
Here are various meanings that can be conveyed, either in isolation or in confusion, through the use of the word "Capitalism". In a vague attempt of classification, the "type" of such definitions have been distinguished as "P" for phenomena, "I" for ideologies, "S" for systems. |
|||
* P.1. the phenomenon by which some riches be saved, accumulated and invested, so as to enable undertakings that wouldn't be possible if such riches were not invested. (etymologically, capital means "ahead of".) |
|||
* P.2. the phenomenon by which such capital be the private property of some individuals, either alone or organized in businesses. |
|||
* P.3. the phenomenon by which some set of individuals earn their living entirely thanks to the rent of capital goods. |
|||
* P.4. the class of individuals who earn their living entirely thanks to the rent of capital goods. |
|||
* I.1. any ideology accepting or promoting the existence of capital goods, including [[communism]] (called "State Capitalism" by many), or any of the latter definitions. |
|||
* I.2. any ideology accepting or promoting individual private property of capital goods. |
|||
* I.3. specific [[libertarianism|classical liberal]] schools of thought that consider capitalism as a good thing, when done within the respect of private property in general. |
|||
* I.4. specific [[mercantilism|mercantilist]] schools of thought that promote the interests of capitalists on the claim that whatever is good for capitalists is good for everyone. |
|||
* S.1. any economic system in which there exists capital goods. |
|||
* S.2. any economic system in which there exists private property of capital goods. |
|||
* S.3. an economic system, more specifically known as [[laissez-faire capitalism]], that conforms to what [[libertarianism|classical liberal]] schools of thought propose, and in which governments do not intervene at all in economic matters. |
|||
* S.4. an economic system that conforms to the [[mercantilism|mercantilist]] views, where governments should politically intervene in economic matters, so as to stimulate and/or regulate it. |
|||
* S.5. the changing and evolving economic system or set of economic systems that have historically evolved in Europe since feudal times and have come to dominate the world economy in the nineteenth century. |
|||
* I.5. Any ideology that justifies the capitalist societies as examplified by Western Europe and Northern America. In particular, [[conservatism]] in these countries (I.5 comes after S.5 because in the case of conservatism, it is the ideology that complies to the system, and not the other way round). |
|||
* I.6. An ideology that says that the businesses are accountable ''only'' to the people who provide its capital and not to other stakeholders such as workers, community or environment. |
|||
=== Confusion between the meanings of the word "Capitalism" === |
|||
As with many common words, and most particularly ideologically laden words, "Capitalism" has many meanings, and there is a lot confusion when using it as to whether it means any particular meaning, or whether it is just a slogan or insult used without particular meaning intend (or worse, with confusion intended). |
|||
"Capitalism" as a phenomenon (meanings P.1 to P.4) is certainly different from |
|||
"Capitalism" as an ideology (I.1 to I.5) or from "Capitalism" as a system (S.1 to S.5) - not the same kind of notion at all. Yet, sometimes the confusion is made nonetheless. |
|||
Opponents to ''Capitalism'' often deny that these represent subtantially different things -- but then, in some extreme case, religious conservatives consider the whole debate for and against capitalism as the same occidental and jewish plot to corrupt their True Religion (be it Christianity, Islam, or whatever). Although it is arguable whether or not two meanings of the word "Capitalism" of the same kind (for instance, I.4 and I.5, or S.4 and S.5) are somehow "equivalent" under someone's subjective notion of equivalence, for the sake of not making a straw man argument when accusing someone else to be a proponent of ''Capitalism'', these different concepts must be clearly distinguished. |
|||
For instance, often the term ''Capitalism'' is used by [[communism|communists]] to dismiss [[libertarianism|classical liberalism]] (I.3) by accusing it with the defects of [[mercantilism]] (I.4), even though [[libertarianism|classical liberalism]] was invented as a opposition to [[mercantilism]] in the first place, long before [[communism]] (I.1) was ever popular. |
|||
The word ''Capitalism'' was mostly unknown, and didn't have any ideologic or systemic connotation until [[Karl Marx]] used it in his famous book [[das Kapital]]. The word became famous, mostly used by [[communism|communists]] in a derogatory way while ignoring any distinction between meanings of it. Finally, some [[libertarianism|classical liberal]] thinkers (notably after [[Ayn Rand]]) accepted this insult as a valid name for their ideology. Actually, some of the most radical classical liberal thinkers now call themselves [[anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalists]] (incidentally, [[Ayn Rand]] was opposed to anarcho-capitalism). |
|||
[[talk:Capitalism|Talk]] |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Revision as of 15:51, 25 February 2002
Redirect to: