Poe's law: Difference between revisions
unnecessary to preserve obvious typos unless they are significant in some way |
RichardWeiss (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The original statement of the adage, by Nathan Poe, was:<ref name="origpost"/> |
The original statement of the adage, by Nathan Poe, was:<ref name="origpost"/> |
||
{{quote|Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is |
{{quote|Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is {{sic|uttrerly}} impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that ''someone'' won't mistake for the genuine article.}} |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
Revision as of 11:29, 6 January 2017
Poe's law is an Internet adage that states that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers or viewers as a sincere expression of the parodied views.[1][2][3]
The original statement of the adage, by Nathan Poe, was:[1]
Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is uttrerly [sic] impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.
History
"Poe's law" was originally written by Nathan Poe in 2005, in a post on christianforums.com, an Internet forum about Christianity. The post was written in the context of a debate about creationism, where a previous poster had remarked to another user "Good thing you included the winky. Otherwise people might think you are serious."[4] Poe then replied, "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is uttrerly [sic] impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article."[1] The original statement of Poe's law referred specifically to creationism, but it has since been generalized to apply to any kind of fundamentalism or extremism.[3]
In part, Poe's post simply reiterated advice often posted on Internet forums about the need to clearly mark sarcasm and parody (e.g. with a smiling or winking emoticon) to avoid confusion. As early as 1983, Jerry Schwarz, in a post on Usenet, wrote:
Avoid sarcasm and facetious remarks.
Without the voice inflection and body language of personal communication these are easily misinterpreted. A sideways smile, :-), has become widely accepted on the net as an indication that "I'm only kidding". If you submit a satiric item without this symbol, no matter how obvious the satire is to you, do not be surprised if people take it seriously.[5]
See also
References
- ^ a b c Poe, Nathan (August 11, 2005). "Big contradictions in the evolution theory". christianforums.com. Archived from the original on May 31, 2014. Retrieved August 20, 2011.
Poe's Law: Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is uttrerly [sic] impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.
- ^ Aikin, Scott F. (January 23, 2009). "Poe's Law, Group Polarization, and the Epistemology of Online Religious Discourse". Social Science Research Network. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1332169. SSRN 1332169.
- ^ a b Chivers, Tom (October 23, 2009). "Internet rules and laws: the top 10, from Godwin to Poe". The Telegraph.: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing."
- ^ Harcoff, Pete (August 10, 2005). "Big contradictions in the evolution theory". christianforums.com.
- ^ "Emily Post for Usenet". Newsgroup: net.announce. November 1, 1983. (Emily Post)
External links