Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Draza Mihailovic: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 853: | Line 853: | ||
::::*6 - Everybody failed to sanction it. Explanations for it, or apologies were also not given. |
::::*6 - Everybody failed to sanction it. Explanations for it, or apologies were also not given. |
||
::::Now, should some internet mediation be more important than the integrity? I don´t think so. If the participants that disagree with me are being allowed to insult me, well how good exemple that is for this, or future mediations here on WP? Nuujinn, please be sure that if I ask you something, and if I have from you a responce that maybe I don´t agree with, the last thing you´ll expect from me is to insult you. I don´t mind criticism, but nobody has the right to tell that I have to take insults because I have a certain opinion. Also, I don´t think that you need to defend too much other paricipants from me, because I was allways been, without any exeption, reported for every minimal reason I gave, so don´t give the phalse impression that the situation is equal and fair. Now, a view that Tomasevic has a conflict of interess while analising the Chetniks is not racist, and it can´t be considered racist. Anyway, there is a number of alternative answers to that if you disagree with, but insults should not be included in any. If I used insults in every ocasion I disagree with some opinion, how would that look? This is not about the discussion, or about the opinion of each one of us, this has to do with minimal respect that we should have for WP and all the participants here. And also Sunray, your judgment on how I am Serb (???), so because of that I am entitled to hear this sorts of insults from a Croatian (???), has nothing logical on it... [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 23:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC) |
::::Now, should some internet mediation be more important than the integrity? I don´t think so. If the participants that disagree with me are being allowed to insult me, well how good exemple that is for this, or future mediations here on WP? Nuujinn, please be sure that if I ask you something, and if I have from you a responce that maybe I don´t agree with, the last thing you´ll expect from me is to insult you. I don´t mind criticism, but nobody has the right to tell that I have to take insults because I have a certain opinion. Also, I don´t think that you need to defend too much other paricipants from me, because I was allways been, without any exeption, reported for every minimal reason I gave, so don´t give the phalse impression that the situation is equal and fair. Now, a view that Tomasevic has a conflict of interess while analising the Chetniks is not racist, and it can´t be considered racist. Anyway, there is a number of alternative answers to that if you disagree with, but insults should not be included in any. If I used insults in every ocasion I disagree with some opinion, how would that look? This is not about the discussion, or about the opinion of each one of us, this has to do with minimal respect that we should have for WP and all the participants here. And also Sunray, your judgment on how I am Serb (???), so because of that I am entitled to hear this sorts of insults from a Croatian (???), has nothing logical on it... [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 23:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
::::::I for one have had enough of this. From now on, all unreferenced attempts to discredit sources should be completely ignored. I recommend a simple "radical" rule: all non-sourced statements should be completely disregarded. '''''Nobody''''' anywhere cares in the slightest about whatever you (or I) have to say about acclaimed authors, or about your (or mine) "reviews" of professional publications. I'm still having vague hopes that this is a serious scientific discussion. |
|||
::::::These sort of outbursts and essays are extremely detrimental to the mediation, as they sap energy and time, diverting attention from actual discussion. Not to mention that its annoying to have to go in circles and repeat the same things for the fiftieth time. --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 00:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Examples of use of sources== |
==Examples of use of sources== |
||