Cricket in 1729

There are signs of increasing media interest in English cricket during the summer of 1729 as reports of seven matches have survived, compared with four in each of the two previous years. Although the source information is confusing, Sir William Gage's XI achieved the earliest known innings victory when they defeated Edwin Stead's XI at Penshurst Park in August. Cricket continued to spread throughout England and is known to have reached both Gloucestershire and Norfolk in 1729; also, its popularity at the University of Oxford was attested by Dr Samuel Johnson, a student there at the time. The oldest known bat, now on display in the Kennington Oval pavilion, is dated 1729.

Eleven-a-side matches

Six top-class matches are known to have been arranged although the results of four are unknown.^[1]^[2]^{[note 1]}

Dartford v London

Dartford and London played each other twice in 1729. The first match, on 30 July, was played in Dartford—probably on Dartford Brent. The stake was £50 but the result of the match is unknown.^[5] A return match took place 5 August on Kennington Common,^[1] and the 7 August edition of the London Evening Post says: "On Tuesday was played a great cricket match on Kennington Common between the Londoners and the Dartford men for a considerable sum of money, wagers and bets, the latter beat the former very much".^[6]^[7] This match is mentioned in correspondence to the 4 September 1890 edition of Cricket: A Weekly Record of the Game.^[8]

Inter-county matches

There were two matches in which both teams were named after their respective counties. However, there is no certainty at this stage of cricket's development that any team was representative of a whole county. It has been suggested that teams called Kent, for example, consisted of players from the Dartford area only.^[9] Kent played in both matches, one against Sussex and the other against Surrey. Neither result is known.^[1]^[5]

Kent played Sussex 24 June on Walworth Common, a neutral venue in Surrey which was used occasionally during this period. The London Evening Post pre-announced: "On Tuesday next at Walworth Common will be play'd a Match at Cricket between the Counties of Kent and Sussex, for fifty Pounds a Side, to meet at One o'Clock, play or pay". That is a typical example of an eighteenth century notice. This one is unusual, however, in its emphasis upon county names, rather than some other nomenclature, and it is notable as the earliest mention of a team expressly called Sussex, though teams of similar strength had been raised by Sussex patrons in earlier seasons.^[10]^[11]

The 26 August edition of the Daily Journal reported that a match would be played same day near Farnham between "Mr Steed (sic) of Kent and his Company, against the best Players in the County of Surrey". Farnham was later known for its Holt Pound ground that was associated with Billy Beldham and John Wells.^[11]

Gage's XI v Stead's XI

Edwin Stead again matched his Kent team against those of his Sussex rivals, the 2nd Duke of Richmond and Sir William Gage. As a newspaper report said, "the scale of victory (for some years past) has been generally on the Kentish side". But, on 28 August, when Stead's XI met Gage's XI at Penshurst Park, Gage's team is believed to have gained the earliest known innings victory (i.e., scoring more in one completed innings than their opponents in two). It is understood that Stead's XI were all players from Kent, but their opponents included players from Hampshire and Surrey as well as Sussex. The match was played for 100 guineas with "some thousands" watching. The newspaper says Gage's XI "got as many within 3 in one Hand, as the former did in two, so the Kentish men flung it up". A "hand" was a team's innings but the report is confusing because Stead's XI must have batted last and they apparently conceded the match when still three runs behind—therefore Gage's XI won by an innings and three runs. Thomas Waymark, described as "a groom of the Duke of Richmond" was the outstanding player. The report says he "signalised himself by extraordinary agility and dexterity" and "turned the scale of victory".^[12]^[13]^[14]^[10]^[7]^[1]

There was a return match in September on "The Downs" near Lewes. A report in the British Journal on 13 September says: "The great match played at Penshurst will be played again in Sussex". As before, it was effectively Kent against a team from three counties. F. S. Ashley-Cooper asserted that the three counties team should have been called England, even though cricket at that time had still not made headway beyond its native southeast.^[12]^[13]^[14]^[10]^[7]^[1]

Other events

Cricket continued to spread throughout England and a local game in Gloucester on 22 September 1729 is the earliest known reference to cricket in the county of Gloucestershire.^[15] The match was pre-announced 15 September in the Gloucester Journal which said the prize was "upwards of 20 guineas".^[16] Although matches in the county of Norfolk are unknown before 1745, the Norwich Gazette and the Norwich Mercury both carried notices for the Gage/Stead match in September 1729.^[16]

There is a bat in the Kennington Oval pavilion which belonged to John Chitty of Knaphill, Surrey. Dated 1729, it is the oldest known bat.^[15] It looks more like a field hockey stick than a modern cricket bat but its curvature was to enable the batsman to play a ball that was always rolled or skimmed along the ground, as in bowls, never pitched. Pitching began about 30 years later and the straight bats used nowadays were invented in response to the pitched delivery.

Dr Samuel Johnson attended the University of Oxford from October 1728 until the following summer and later told James Boswell that cricket matches were played there. Boswell mentioned this in his Life of Samuel Johnson.^[11]

Confusion has arisen over a pre-announced match on Tuesday, 5 August 1729. In H. T. Waghorn's original research, he noted the date as Tuesday, 5 August 1728, and several sources have listed the match in 1728.^[12]^[13]^[1]^[17] It was realised by a 21st century researcher that the given day of the week did not match the calendar, because 5 August 1728 was a Monday.^[18] A review of the primary source confirmed that the match in question was due to be held on Tuesday, 5 August 1729.^[19] The teams were the Gentlemen of Middlesex and the Gentlemen of London; they were due to meet "in the Field behind the Woolpack Back Gate near Sadler's Wells" for a stake of £50 per side. It is not known if the match was actually played but it is the earliest known to involve teams using "Gentlemen" in their name, and it was also the first to involve a team called Middlesex. "Gentlemen only" matches did not involve professionals and are not as highly rated as those that did, especially so on this occasion as the London club's first team was playing Dartford same day (see above).^[12]^[13]^[19]

Notes

^ Some eleven-a-side matches played before 1864 have been rated "first-class" by certain sources, but there was no such standard at the time. The term came into common use from around 1864, when overarm bowling was legalised, and was formally defined as a standard by a meeting at Lord's, in May 1894, of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) and the county clubs which were then competing in the County Championship. The ruling was effective from the beginning of the 1895 season, but pre-1895 matches of the same standard have no official definition of status because the ruling is not retrospective. However, matches of a similar standard since the beginning of the 1864 season are generally considered to have an unofficial first-class status.^[3] Pre-1864 matches which are included in the ACS' "Important Match Guide" may generally be regarded as top-class or, at least, historically significant.^[4] For further information, see First-class cricket.

References

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ACS 1981, p. 19.
^ Maun 2009, pp. 38–41.
^ ACS 1982, pp. 4–5.
^ ACS 1981, pp. 1–40.
^ ^a ^b Maun 2009, pp. 38–39.
^ Buckley 1935, p. 3.
^ ^a ^b ^c Maun 2009, p. 39.
^ "Pavilion Gossip". Cricket: A Weekly Record of the Game. 9: 377. 4 September 1890. Retrieved 4 September 2024.
^ Buckley 1937, p. 1.
^ ^a ^b ^c McCann 2004, p. 9.
^ ^a ^b ^c Maun 2009, p. 38.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Waghorn 1906, p. 7.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Wilson 2005, p. 50.
^ ^a ^b Ashley-Cooper 1929, p. 6.
^ ^a ^b Bowen 1970, p. 263.
^ ^a ^b Maun 2009, p. 40.
^ Maun 2009, p. 37.
^ "Historical Calendar". Dr A. R. Collins. Retrieved 4 September 2024.
^ ^a ^b Maun 2009, p. 248.

Bibliography

ACS (1981). A Guide to Important Cricket Matches Played in the British Isles 1709–1863. Nottingham: ACS.
ACS (1982). A Guide to First-class Cricket Matches Played in the British Isles. Nottingham: ACS.
Ashley-Cooper, F. S. (1929). Kent Cricket Matches, 1719–1880. Gibbs & Sons.
Bowen, Rowland (1970). Cricket: A History of its Growth and Development. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode. ISBN 978-04-13278-60-9.
Buckley, G. B. (1935). Fresh Light on 18th Century Cricket. Birmingham: Cotterell & Co. ISBN 978-19-00592-48-2.
Buckley, G. B. (1937). Fresh Light on pre-Victorian Cricket. Birmingham: Cotterell & Co. ISBN 978-19-00592-49-9.
Maun, Ian (2009). From Commons to Lord's, Volume One: 1700 to 1750. Cambridge: Roger Heavens. ISBN 978-19-00592-52-9.
McCann, Tim (2004). Sussex Cricket in the Eighteenth Century. Lewes: Sussex Record Society. ISBN 978-08-54450-55-8.
Waghorn, H. T. (1906). The Dawn of Cricket. London: Electric Press. ISBN 978-09-47821-17-3.
Wilson, Martin (2005). An Index to Waghorn. Bodyline Books.