Talk:2005 Football League One play-off final/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 18:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Immediate Failures
[edit]It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
-It contains copyright infringements
-It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).
-It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.
-
Links
[edit]Prose
[edit]Lede
[edit]- The 2005 Football League One play-off Final was an association football match which was played on 29 May 2005 at Millennium Stadium, Cardiff, between Hartlepool United and Sheffield Wednesday to determine the third and final team to gain promotion from Football League One to the Football League Championship. - could probably split in two. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Link League Two. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
General
[edit]- manager Neale Cooper - reword to avoid WP:SEAOFBLUE? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- "by mutual consent" - who said this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- The BBC report. Attribution is clear from the reference. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 13:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- UK - probably better as United Kingdom. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sure it's well known as UK but meh. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 13:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Millenium Stadium isn't linked in the body, and it doesn't actually say that is where the final is, or where the Stadium is. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Players were contractually obliged to live within 15 miles (24 km) of Sheffield - as interesting as this is, what does this matter? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- It relates to the fact they all lived close to one another and added to the comaraderie. It's clear in the context of the "team-building": players often live much further away than that. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 13:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Link League Two again in body. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Lee Vilenski all done/responded to. Cheers for the review. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 13:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review meta comments
[edit]- I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)