Talk:Aspen/Pitkin County Airport

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the airport project.

United States: Colorado Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Incidents section?

Wikipedia pages on airports generally have a section on aviation incidents (e.g. crashes) that have occurred there. Unless Aspen is miraculously crash-free since its founding, it should have an incidents section as well. (I don't have the knowledge necessary to write such a section, but I'm sure that info would be available on the NTSB/FAA websites.) KBurchfiel (talk) 04:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Northwest

I've removed Northwest, as they no longer fly to ASE. [1] [2] --75.72.161.204 00:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good information, but unsourced

Thank you to the person who made a bunch of changes from 205.170.51.30 on 24 August. If you can add some inline citations, that would be most helpful. Also, consider registering an account. You clearly have the knowledge and desire to contribute.
S4n1HS22WMX695In (talk) 01:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 19 November 2012. The result of the move review was Closure endorsed.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: speedy close, disruptive, WP:SNOW. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aspen–Pitkin County Airport → Aspen-Pitkin County Airport – Spelling. Apteva (talk) 01:44, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Oppose, as I don't think there's a place called "Aspen-Pitkin" or "Aspen-Pitkin County". 213.246.91.158 (talk) 08:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Irrelevant. That is the name of the airport, and therefore that is the name we should be using for the article. We do not get to make up spellings of items that have established names, like airports. Apteva (talk) 05:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per MOS and various other recent discussions on other hyphen⇔en dash moves. PaleAqua (talk) 02:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
MOS does not apply - it does not tell us how to spell airports, and as far as I have been able to determine, there are no proper nouns which include an endash, while there are many that use a hyphen. It would be wise to include the name of this airport as an example in the MOS, as suggested (spelled with a hyphen). Right now there are at least three examples in the endash section which are incorrectly spelled, using the wrong punctuation and/or the wrong capitalization (one is marked as under discussion). How is anyone to believe the MOS when it is riddled with errors? Apteva (talk) 05:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a proper name with en dash (Aspen–Pitkin County Airport). More books use slash than hyphen in styling this proper name, indicating a parallel relationship between the city and the county; that's the sort of relationship for which WP style uses the en dash. Dicklyon (talk) 05:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Multi: these individual RMs to remove dashes from titles are all part of Apteva's one persistently disruptive anti-MOS initiative, and should really be considered as one question if reconsidered at all. See currently open Talk:Fort Lauderdale–Hollywood International Airport#Requested move and Talk:Seattle–Tacoma International Airport#Requested move 2 as well as closed Talk:Seattle–Tacoma International Airport#Requested move, Talk:Manchester–Boston Regional Airport#Requested move, Talk:Dillant–Hopkins Airport#Requested move, and Talk:Ephraim–Gibraltar Airport#Requested move, (to say nothing of his similar efforts on wars, comets, etc.). If I knew of any cases where his suggestion prevailed, I'd link those, too. Dicklyon (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What is disruptive is someone else moving these to using an endash, when a hyphen is clearly called for. There are 9,000 airports, and none use an endash. These could have been combined, but are more easily discussed separately. Apteva (talk) 21:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close for disruption — kwami (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is never disruption to fix errors. It is, however disruption to introduce them. There are 9,000 airports, and none are spelled using an endash. Apteva (talk) 06:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aspen–Pitkin County Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707175933/http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/county/countycode/Pitkinco10tx.pdf to http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/county/countycode/Pitkinco10tx.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]