Talk:Battle of Đức Cơ

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 June 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Đức Cơ, rather than Duc Co

Is there any value in English Wikipedia having an article title that is not pronounceable?
What exactly is the point?
Varlaam (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Đức Cơ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070515093303/http://cafe3.ktdom.com:80/vietvet/us/ducco.htm to http://cafe3.ktdom.com/vietvet/us/ducco.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claim of collateral damage

This claim should not be in the article since the cited source may have used Wikipedia as a source (the website A Bicyclette cited has only been around since 2014), and the claim has been in the article since 2011. Second, it is unrelated - the original source of the claim on the Internet is "August 9, 1966 - U.S. jets attack two South Vietnamese villages by mistake, killing 63 civilians and wounding over 100." [1] without mentioning this battle. Since there were likely a large number of airstrikes on that day, and the US reports of this action do not refer to calling in the "fast movers" (jet fighters), I do not think it should be include. Lastly, there is no evidence that the "villages" are Duc Co or close to Duc Co. Kges1901 (talk) 09:13, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]