Talk:Best New Zealand Poems

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability, NPOV

This article is basically a summary of another website, and has only ever had input from one user. In addition, all references are sourced from teh website itself.

A cursory look reveals that it repeatedly lists many of the same people (not all of whom have been given their own pages yet) and, in 2006 at least, they were drawn from only a handful of sources.

Is this incestuousness something to do with New Zealand in general, or are we looking at a small partisan website here, in which case we need better NPOV?

I think we need to explain why the website is notable. Does it put out a print publication?

T Walker 57 00:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Best New Zealand Poems series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120605112041/http://www.thearts.co.nz/news.php%26news_id%3D171 to http://www.thearts.co.nz/news.php%26news_id%3D171

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]