Talk:Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–1930)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lehigh Valley, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lehigh ValleyWikipedia:WikiProject Lehigh ValleyTemplate:WikiProject Lehigh ValleyLehigh Valley articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: American & Canadian Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Request move back to F.C.

I don't believe anon users can move pages, but someone who can should undo the move to SC. The Geocities fan page may refer to a "soccer club", but the Boston Globe in 1925 article refers to "Bethlehem Steel F. C." and the National Soccer Hall of Fame page refers to "Bethlehem Steel Football Club". Those seem a tad more authoritative than a modern fan page. Hell, if you move an article, at least edit the article accordingly: the moved page still doesn't say "soccer club" anywhere in it. --76.121.3.11 (talk) 18:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image

There is a copyright expired image here on page 42. Miyagawa (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–30) per WP:DATERANGE, USL article moved to base location. While John makes a reasonable point about consistency, no one else has commented on that aspect and hence there is no consensus to change the status quo – therefore the old team will retain "F.C." while the new one will retain "FC". No prejudice against a future discussion on that topic. TheBigJagielka, Jkudlick, Fenix down and AF4JM, I'm pinging you to please make sure that all the incoming links get fixed after this move. Jenks24 (talk) 14:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– The original club has not been active since 1930. The newly formed team shouldn't need USL in parentheses as it's the only active club with that name. The changes would be inline with the system used for Vancouver Whitecaps. TheBigJagielka (talk) 21:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concur to maintain consistency in article titles. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 12:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - seems sensible to me. Fenix down (talk) 13:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Concur (mostly) - I would think that both articles would be the same, either FC or F.C., I think it's silly for them to be different. Other than that I concur.--John, AF4JM (talk) 11:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–30). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://bethlehemsteelsoccer.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–30). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://bethlehem.patch.com/groups/stephen-barrons-blog/p/bp--the-philadelphia-union-following-the-ghosts-of-be4df1f2417a

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–30). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091027132652/http://bethlehemsteelsoccer.org/ to http://bethlehemsteelsoccer.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–30) be renamed and moved to Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–1930).

result:
Moved. See no general agreement below in regard to whether the parenthetical disambiguation should be a date range, a single year or is not needed at all. So this request is granted per the guideline without prejudice. A new move request may be opened at any time to resolve the disambiguation issue. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) PI Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 14:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–30) → Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–1930) – ~~This is a partial revert of a WP:RM/TR, the original article title was Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–30).~~(edit 12:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC) revert done in RM/TR) Despite Bethlehem Steel F.C. has renamed to Philadelphia Union II, there is no prove "Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–1930)" is the primary topic instead, per WP:Primarytopic and MOS:DATERANGE. --Matthew hk (talk) 06:31, 14 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Matthew hk (talk) 06:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note:, the redirect Bethlehem Steel FC currently not cleaned and pointed to Philadelphia Union II by context. Thus it is very very not a good condition that "FC" redirect to Philadelphia Union II but F.C. point to "Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907–1930)". Matthew hk (talk) 06:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect also fixed to pre-bold change for Bethlehem Steel FC and Bethlehem Steel F.C. Matthew hk (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Bethlehem Steel F.C. (1907) in line with well-established standard naming conventions for cases like this, see also Accrington Stanley F.C. (1891) and Airdrieonians F.C. (1878). Giant Snowman 19:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Bethlehem Steel F.C.; keep Bethlehem Steel FC as a redirect to Philadelphia Union II for now to avoid breaking links and because the name change just happened. The USL team (Union II) has never used "F.C." with periods in their name which means that punctuation can unambiguously refer to the 1907 club – parenthetical disambiguation should only be used when necessary. Sure, it would be a little confusing to have different punctuations go to different articles but that can easily be cleared up with hatnotes ~~such as with Pacific FC and Pacific F.C.~~. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blaixx (talk • contribs) 2020-01-15T12:58:48 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. Your example, Pacific FC and Pacific F.C. is the prefect sample for something need to be disambiguated. Matthew hk (talk) 14:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, ignore that then. The ideal title for the USL team is Philadelphia Union II. The ideal title for the 1907 team is Bethlehem Steel F.C. Why include unnecessary disambiguation? BLAIXX 17:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthew hk and GiantSnowman: have you given this any more thought, I think we should try again to reach consensus. BLAIXX 01:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I stand by my suggestion. Giant Snowman 18:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.