Talk:Big Brother (American TV series)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Initial Reason For Reassessment

This reassessment is because this article failed Good Article Nomination over 3 years ago and since has been improved significantly. --Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 15:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Complete Reassessment

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
As in the To-do list may want to improve grammar in minor areas.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
As long as the facts are also in an episode where they can become verified they just need to be cited to be OK.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Article could expand in the sections of each season.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Major fix in focused section and MoS minor fixes. --Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 16:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on fixing the issues in my sandbox, it may take some time for me to find all the necessary sources and fix MoS issues. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 04:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. When you are done, please tell me on my talkpage, I will then re-review the article.

I am still working on the article but due to real life events my progress has slowed. You can see my progress via my sandbox. I am revamping the article to be more in line with other good articles and featured articles of TV series. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 18:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coming back to this, this is stale and still needs work, ✗ Fail for now. JoeGazz ▲ 23:48, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]