Talk:Three Flavours Cornetto

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Three Flavours Cornetto article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 2 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to The Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy. The result of the discussion was Moved to Three Flavours Cornetto.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Hot Fuzz#Critical response|Hot Fuzz]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Recurring cast

The recurring cast section states (as does the source used) "The twins are in it". Does anyone know what this refers to? The cast list at IMDb (link) for The Worlds End has Kelly and Stacy Franklin as the Twins, and Francesca and Charlotte Reidie as their their teenage selves, but none of them were in Shaun of the Dead [1] or Hot Fuzz [2]. Any thoughts? Swanny18 (talk) 20:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Three Flavours Cornetto. Consensus gravitated to the alternate proposed title Three Flavours Cornetto. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 10:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Three Flavours Cornetto trilogy → The Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy – Per the official title and logo of the film series, and as released on the home media collection boxsets, this page should be moved as requested due to the fact that it is a pronoun (title), and the letters "T" that aren't capitalized are not done so, in error. User:DisneyMetalhead (talk) 24:47, 30 September 2022 (MT)

Comment I'm neutral, but whoever processes this should be aware of WP:THE. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Plus it was moved the other way back in 2012. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Adding or removing "the" can often be controversial, and Wikipedia guidelines and policies don't say that "officialness" should determine the choice of a title. Please see WP:OFFICIALNAME. Also, for this topic I see that the logo styling puts "the" in a smaller font than the main part of the title, thus deemphasizing it. The cited source at Box Office Mojo just refers to "Three Flavours Cornetto" by itself. Both The Guardian and Entertainment Weekly just say "Cornetto trilogy" (lowercase "trilogy"). Moviefone uses "Cornetto Trilogy" as an article tag (but doesn't mention it in the article body). Time Out uses "Cornetto Trilogy". IWatchStuff and MrMovieBuff (via MetaCritic) use "Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy" (without "The"). IGN refers to "Edgar Wright, Simon Pegg and Nick Frost's 'Three Flavours Cornetto' trilogy" (with no "the" and with the word "trilogy" outside the quote marks. There don't seem to be very many sources that discuss this topic. Many of the cited sources don't even mention the trilogy topic at all. It is probably best to open an RM discussion about this. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm obviously in favor of/support the move, but would like to elaborate. My argument would be that while the guidelines state official name doesn't always constitute the best name, this article should indeed reflect the studio's official name. In doing so it most accurately represents the content of the page. While there have been variations of the name by commentators and articles -- I would observe that this may be due to the respective writers not being familiar with the official title. As the studios involved have since published film series content with the name/logo on the packaging, it couldn't be more plain. These variation A.K.A. names can be referenced in the introductory paragraph (or elsewhere), but the fact that the film studios and those that own the films has made an official title, WP should reflect that. As readers see the official title and its logo, they will become more familiar with it. As they are familiar with it, it will become commonplace. Cheers m8s!--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, it could be that the move that user:KJ cheetham mentioned before may have been premature. Alternatively it may have been the best option at that point in time, as perhaps the associated studios hadn't officially named the anthology film series(?). Just a thought. Patent/copyright/official logo - all seem to be the simple direction to move the article.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would also support something like: Three Flavours Cornetto (film series), or The Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy (film series).--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I would support a move to the simple Three Flavours Cornetto - no "The", no "trilogy", no disambiguator. This is supported by the sources quoted above. Tevildo (talk) 10:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose: Per my survey of sources above and per WP:THE, "The" is not consistently included in independent reliable sources that discuss this topic. I'm not personally one to defer to "official" sources, and even the official logo de-emphasizes its "THE" and "TRILOGY" by separating them off from the central phrase using horizontal lines and a smaller font, implying they are not part of the main title. Various sources omit one or both of those words or separate them out (e.g. using lowercase or putting "trilogy" outside of the quote marks that enclose the central three words). Most sources treat the name of the collection very informally, sometimes even using different names for it, such as "ice cream trilogy". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and move to Three Flavours Cornetto per WP:THE and WP:COMMONNAME. The definite article is usually lowercased in running text if it's included at all. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.