Jump to content

Talk:Gestion Bonfire/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 19:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Olympic medal record

[edit]
  • No issues

Lead

[edit]
  • No issues

Early life

[edit]
  • No issues

Competitive career

[edit]
  • No issues

Later life and legacy

[edit]
  • No issues

References

[edit]
  • No issues


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that this article meets the good article criteria. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]