Talk:Effects of Typhoon Bopha in the Caroline Islands
Effects of Typhoon Bopha in the Caroline Islands has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 3, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Background?
[edit]Is there too much background in the article? The MH portion seems a bit excessive given that it's a sub-article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Effects of Typhoon Bopha in Micronesia and Palau/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 01:49, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- "Bopha passed just south of the island nation" - I'd specify the exact mileage. It's pretty important IMO.
- "Rapid intensification" - why capitalized?
- Why is Bopha listed as a C4 in the infobox? Its main article said it was a C5. You never say in the article what its ultimate peak winds were, so I'm confused why you only mention peak of C4.
- Added a mention of the JTWC C5 peak, but for effects articles don't we only show the intensity of the storm when it struck the areas in question rather than its peak? Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Some of the background seems extraneous, considering the article's subject matter. Namely toward the end of the first paragraph.
- [1] - plenty more info for Chuuk and FSM via NCDC. [2] - ditto Palau
- The second paragraph of impact should probably be split up.
- "pushed several hundred feet inland, cutting off roads and leaving behind several feet of debris" - interesting you use "feet" here, while the rest of the article uses metric first.
- Source only mentioned feet so that's what I went with. Could be wrong to say "several hundred meters" as even 300 ft is less than 100 m. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- You use $20 million in damage in the infobox, but the article says $15 to 20. Has there ever been an update? Perhaps use the $15 and the damagespre parameter to say "at least"?
- "some roads on Koror were damaged by storm surge and impassable" - the "impassable" feels out of place here. I'd put that before "damaged" for better flow.
All in all a good read! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:49, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Effects of Typhoon Bopha in Micronesia and Palau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ31-PGUM_201211252218.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ31-PGUM_201211260303.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ31-PGUM_201211270317.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ31-PGUM_201211272203.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ31-PGUM_201211280911.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ31-PGUM_201211290650.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTPQ31-PGUM_201211300336.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://pidp.org/pireport/2012/December/12-14-06.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guampdn.com/article/20121204/NEWS01/212040306/Palau-assesses-Typhoon-Bopha-s-damage
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.guampdn.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012212120314
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- GA-Class Weather articles
- Low-importance Weather articles
- GA-Class Tropical cyclone articles
- Low-importance Tropical cyclone articles
- WikiProject Tropical cyclones articles
- GA-Class Pacific typhoon articles
- Low-importance Pacific typhoon articles
- WikiProject Weather articles