Talk:Erk Democratic Party

Central Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal Erk Democratic Party is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

As Erk previously referred to a muslim socialist organisation active in Bashkiria, Bukhara and Turkestan from 1919 to 1921, does the ULDP claim any link to this, or is it a matter of using the same name derived from the word for "liberty"? Harrypotter (talk) 17:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. No objection to the second move so that goes through, old title will be redirected to the dab ERK. As for the first move, I feel there is also a consensus for it – those supporting have made good common name arguments and, while avoiding slashes is not mandatory, it is desirable. Jenks24 (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– "Liberty" doesn't seem to be part of the party's name. It's just the English translation of the Uzbek word "Erk". We don't usually include translations in the title – it's sufficient if the translation is mentioned in the lead. Most of the English-language sources available (amongst them Political Organization in Central Asia and Azerbijan: Sources and Documents, Central Asia, 130 Years of Russian Dominance: A Historical Overview, Helsinki Watch: Human Rights in Uzbekistan, US Library of Congress, Civil Society in Central Asia, Guardian) refer to the party as "Erk Democratic Party", so there we go, that's our WP:COMMONNAME.
Regarding the historic party, the disambiguator needs to be slightly more precise. As we don't know much about that party, for now I chose the rather generic disambiguator "(historic party)". Feel free to come up with a better proposal though. -- PanchoS (talk) 02:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment MOS:SLASH/WP:SUBPAGE we should not be using a subpage location for the name of this article, the slash needs to be removed from the article title -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 03:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – Sources say things like "Uzbekistan Liberty Democratic Party (O'zbekistan Erk Demokratik Partiyasi)" and "Erk (Liberty) democratic party". It's true that the name does not include Erk/Liberty, but this is one way to specify the foreign/English name. Are we sure that dropping Liberty is a good idea? What do most English-language sources do? As for the subpage argument, I don't think that matters. The slash can be interpreted as part of an ordinary name, and subpage mechanism won't be noticed or get in the way of that. Dicklyon (talk) 05:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Erk/Liberty Democratic Party → Erk Democratic Party. There is only one working reference or external link, and it uses "Erk Democratic party". Is "liberty" a sort of translation of "erk"??? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Erk (party) → Erk (historic party) or Erk (party 1919-26), as ambiguous with this article. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Erk Democratic Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511234644/http://www.pen.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/776/prmID/174 to http://www.pen.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/776/prmID/174

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]