Talk:George Tutill

George Tutill is currently an Economics and business good article nominee. Nominated by Unexpectedlydian^♯4 talk^‽ at 18:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: Banner manufacturer (1817–1887)

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Textile Arts Low‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:George Tutill/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 18:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a neat little article about a topic and person which I know nothing about! I'm looking forward to reviewing! It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Unexpectedlydian, I love your name btw!

I have begun the review. I have a concern about the reliability of one of the sources which I addressed below. I'll hold off on the prose review until this has been addressed. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) clock

Lead

Definitely include that he was English/British. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Early life

Founding and overview of business

International business

Banner manufacturing process

Style and reception

Art

Personal life

Death and legacy

Sources clock

Health/formatting (Criterion 2a) clock

No broken URLs, I would recommend adding archive links for the two anonymous sources, as they will be really hard to find if the URLs go down. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "Works cited" section has a duplicate of "The art and ideology of the trade union emblem" source. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability (Criterion 2b) clock

Mostly books from reliable publishers, with less reliable sources used to fill in only minor details. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My only concern is the reliability of Roger Logan's "East Riding to East End" which seems to be self-published? It read like a reliable source, but I cannot find any references to the work, nor any information about Roger Logan being a subject expert. I'll hold off on the prose review until this concern is sorted out, since if it doesn't qualify as a reliable source that will significantly reshape the article. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d) clock

Copyvio (Criterion 2d) clock

Earwig finds no too close paraphrasing or violations. Will check further on the spot check. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b) clock

Stable (Criterion 5) Y

Media clock

This interesting website has an image for Tutill, do you have any idea where it's from? If we can find its original source, it would be a great image for the infobox. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tags (Criterion 6a) Y

Captions (Criterion 6b) clock

Two examples of banners manufactured by Tutill for the Court Pride of Onehunga, Ancient Order of Foresters.

It's a bit unclear that the Court Pride of Onehunga is part of the Ancient order of Foresters, rather than them being two separate entities. Perhaps something like "Court Pride of Onehunga, a group within the Ancient Order of Foresters" would be better. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nitpick: the grammatical subject of the sentence is "Two examples of banners", bit it is clearly meant to be the two banners themselves. Removing "examples of" fixes this ambiguity. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link "biblical story of Zacchaeus" It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)