Talk:I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (British TV series) series 7

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2019. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Television: British / Reality Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Malcom

Do we include him in the table. Also I don't think the bit about Koo Stark is acceptable.--Hiltonhampton (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YES,YES,YES to Malcolm as he was actually suppose to be in the line up and was until he walked whereas NO,NO,NO to Koo Stark as i bet there were dozens of contestants in the line up In23065 (talk) 16:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No No No To Malcolm. He did not enter the jungle with the other contestants . The others in the previous series quit while they were already in the camp for a few days. He didn't even step one foot in the camp.Malcolm should just be mentioned in the notes below. He never entered camp and was the first to quit before the show Why should he be considered 12th when he did not participate? The others who quit at least were seen on camera for a few days.

With regards to the Koo Stark article, I would give some credence to it as It came from the same newspaper as the Malcolm McLaren article that we are referencing from, The Daily Mail. 69.90.207.148 (talk) 23:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)samusek2[reply]

Thats not really a reason as three other newspapers published the same story about Malcom on the same day. Also remember, Wikipedia is not a rumor mill.--Hiltonhampton (talk) 17:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bushtucker Trials

Please when your editing the chart for the trials before it has been aired then please source it. You should find a URL on the ITV site.--Hiltonhampton (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ITVCelebrity.jpg

Image:ITVCelebrity.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:IACGMOOH logo.png

The image File:IACGMOOH logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Public vote results

Could someone tell me where they got the public voting results from, is there a source anywhere? --MSalmon (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK series 7). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]