Talk:Indiana-class battleship/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DraconianDebate (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
GA guidelines require Good Articles to meet the following criteria.
Well Written
[edit]The prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct
Other than a few issues with spelling and grammar (which I have corrected), the article passes this requirement. 
Complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
The lead section and layout meet the guidelines of the manual of style. As well, there are no words to avoid, works of fiction, or lists contained within this article.
Factually accurate and verifiable
[edit]Provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout
The reference section complies with WP:Layout
Provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons
Article provides reasonable use of citation from a wide range of sources.
Contains no original research.
From what I can see, all information presented in this article is verified by references that meet all Wikipedia guidelines.
Broad in scope
[edit]The article remains focused on the main aspects of the topic, without going off on a tangent.
Neutral
[edit]There is no non-neutral point of view expressed in this article
Stable
[edit]There is no evidence of recent edit wars or other signs of instability.
Illustrated
[edit]The article utilizes images well, and all images used in the article are relevant, and have suitable copyright status and documentation
Summary
[edit]I believe that this article meets, if not exceeds, all of the requirements to obtain GA status.