Talk:List of anarchist congresses

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Anarchist Congresses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.amoryrabia.org/cntvalladolidarchivo/aitcongreso.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120621211045/http://sovmadrid.cnt.es/paginas/anarcocomunica.htm to http://sovmadrid.cnt.es/paginas/anarcocomunica.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Anarchist St. Imier International which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Limiting to international conferences

@Czar, as a response to the question in your edit summary: I think limiting to international conferences/congresses is probably the only way to keep this under control. I don't know much about other congresses, but I'd assume there have been loads of them and we'd end up with some sort of frankensteinian kitchen-sink article if we started including them. That said, it seems to me that we need to mention at least some regional congresses in order to contextualize the list - like that 1880 Jura Federation one that I left in, which I think is important to mention. -- asilvering (talk) 21:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

So the answer is both? :)

My take is that we can include all independently notable congresses (i.e., with their own articles) and only include congresses that aren't independently notable (i.e., without their own links) when they've been discussed as the subject of external/non-partisan, either as a set (like the [[Anti-authoritarian International set) or individually (like the 1914 London congress). czar 01:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)