Talk:List of compositions by Luciano Berio

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canticum novissimi testamenti (II)

There's a work by Berio that first appeared in a recording by London Sinfonietta Voices (Philips 446 094-2) as Canticum novissimi testamenti II. A later recording by Neue Vocalsolisten Stuttgart (Wergo WER 6678-2) gives the title simply as Canticum novissimi testamenti. These two recordings also disagree on the date of composition, Philips giving 1989–93 and Wergo giving 1989–91. I'm not sure which is correct, but the "official" Berio website linked seems to agree with Wergo. --Deskford (talk) 21:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, Osmond-Smith and Earle in Grove Online also agree that 1989–91 is correct.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Universal Edition seems to agree with that too (link). The composer's own note quoted on lucianoberio.org (link) gives the date simply as 1989, and includes "II" in the title. My guess is that this note was written before the 1991 revision and that Berio must have dropped the "II" from the title when he revised it, but I doubt I'll find a source to confirm this suspicion. --Deskford (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of compositions by Luciano Berio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150219091549/http://www.kwf.org/kurt-weill/weill-works/by-genre/28-weill-works/weill-works/218-t6main to http://www.kwf.org/kurt-weill/weill-works/by-genre/28-weill-works/weill-works/218-t6main

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]