This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Material from this page has been split from List of Oh My Goddess! episodes on December 8, 2008. The page history of this page now serves as the attribution history for part of the contents of those pages.
"...However, Urd's choices are all inanimate objects. So she finally settles on a kettle, and Gan-chan marries Mrs. Kettle. Urd gives the kettle a voice-over voice and legs during their honeymoon, but Gan-chan insists that Mrs. Kettle have her own voice. Once Mrs. Kettle can speak, she declares that she has fallen for another kettle and elopes, leaving Gan-chan single again."
— questionable logic
In the above, all the choices are inanimate objects. So why does she settle on another inanimate object (i.e. the kettle)? Then once Mrs. Kettle can speak, why does she "elope"? Mrs. Kettle and Gan-chan were married (apparently—see i.e. "their honeymoon") so it would seem as if elope is not the correct word: it should be "remarries". —Anne Teedham (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, my wording is definitely off. "So she finally" should be "so he finally", which I've changed. The logic behind eloping would be that Mrs. Kettle and the alternate male kettle do not remarry, but rather run off together, hence "elope". Thanks for your copyediting and comments! ɳOCTURNEɳOIR(t • c)18:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So the elope—remarry scenario is really not something to do with a honeymoon but rather something more within the scope of a pre-honeymoon or something such as "on the eve of their honeymoon, yes? The use of the word "eve" would clear the air of confusion because it would imply that they had not yet married. Because you used the word "married", I changed everything around again and used the word "runs off" instead.19:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)—Anne Teedham (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
