Jump to content

Talk:Lunch atop a Skyscraper/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rublov (talk · contribs) 23:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this article. PS: I haven't forgotten about Wikipedia:Peer review/Ike for President (advertisement)/archive1; it's still on my to-do list. Ruбlov (talkcontribs) 23:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Prose

[edit]

the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiability

[edit]

it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

it contains no original research

it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism

  • Earwig shows "violation possible" because of the lengthy Swedish quote in the "Non-English sources" section. Not a plagiarism issue, but could the quote be trimmed?

Breadth

[edit]

it addresses the main aspects of the topic

  • Short article but seems to address all the major points.

it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutrality

[edit]

it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

Stability

[edit]

it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Media

[edit]

media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

  • All photos in the article are in the public domain.

media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Nice article. Just a few things to address. Putting on hold. Ruбlov (talkcontribs) 00:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rublov: Thanks a lot for the review. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Great, happy to pass. Ruбlov (talkcontribs) 12:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.