Talk:Mediaweek (Australia)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Sydney Low‑importance

	Australia portal Mediaweek (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

On 22 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Mediaweek. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 13 August 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below, but a redirect from the proposed title to the current location has been created. Dekimasuよ! 09:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mediaweek (Australian magazine) → Mediaweek (Australian website) – It no longer prints a magazine, and as far as I can see is a website only. Was going to just go ahead and move it, but thought I'd better check a few opinions first in case of counter-arguments. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 17:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak oppose~~ Neutral: for 27 of its 32 years it was a print magazine, while I am guessing it has only been a web site for about 20 of its existence. Also "magazine" is not wrong for an online publication; while "website" sounds like a web site only. Perhaps more importantly, it is not only a web site, it also publishes an email newsletter. Perhaps "magazine" is not quite accurate, but I don't think "website" is either. (p.s. I have no connection to them, I just stumbled on this). Adpete (talk) 04:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that they don't do the emails any more and appear to function only as a website. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to their "about" their daily reports are email ("delivered for free every morning to your inbox."), though it looks like users can access them by the web too. So I dunno :) Adpete (talk) 12:47, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changed answer to "neutral". I can see arguments both ways and I don't have the time to resolve it in my mind :) Adpete (talk) 01:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Australia has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Magazines has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Media has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Marketing & Advertising has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about moving it to Mediaweek (Australia), which already redirects here? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose online magazines are still magazines. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 22 September 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– WP:PrimaryTopic. The Australian magazine is the only one that still exists. It also started before the American magazine. DilatoryRevolution (talk) 08:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Neither historical age, or whether the publication is defunct, are criteria used to WP:DETERMINEPRIMARY. No evidence that the Australian magazine is more notable. 162 etc. (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The Australian magazine is uniquely styled MediaWeek, which should be the topic name. Doug butler (talk) 21:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.