Talk:National Defence Radio Establishment

Military history: Intelligence / National / European / Nordic C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	National militaries task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Espionage Low‑importance

	National Defence Radio Establishment is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

S1

The link to the S1 unit says it's been disbanded since 2006. Is something wrong? --AW (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which link are you talking about? 81.225.216.21 (talk) 14:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user was commenting on something long since removed. See Old revision of National Defence Radio Establishment (Sweden) / Gavleson (talk) 02:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge into National Defence Radio Establishment (Sweden)

I propose FRA law be merged into National Defence Radio Establishment (Sweden). I've recently made an extensive rewrite of the page on FRA law, and I think a merger of that page into this one makes a lot of sense. The reasons are:

duplication of content
significant overlap (which cannot be avoided)
context reasons

The main reason: This page doesn't have a section about the oversight of the FRA, which kind of important. It's mentioned, but not in detail, and simply moving that information from the page on the FRA law to this page would result in significant loss of context on FRA law.

This page is not that big to begin with, and if I remove the duplication of content, it shouldn't become that much larger after a merger. You can compare this page in size and content with other pages on signals intelligence agencies: NSA and GCHQ. If you have an opinion, please post it here. Gavleson (talk) 17:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some clarification: Obviously, I feel the section "Scope, limits and provisions" is equally important as the one titled "Oversight". Renamed "Legal framework" it very much belongs on this page, IMO. That wouldn't leave much on FRA law... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavleson (talk • contribs) 17:49, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since there have been no objections, I'm proceeding with the merger as per WP:MERGEPROP for the above stated reasons, and for the fact that "FRA law" is a somewhat crude translation and not an established phrase in English. Discussion closed.Gavleson (talk) 03:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Computer no longer on Top 500? See my edits on the page

Note nr. 5 in [1]

If you click on "Government Agency" [2] it seems to prove by point (better link to add in article? Or in addition?).

Clicking on the computer [3] you see these numbers: 13,728 102.8 146.4

However the other link [4] regarding it falling down the list, before I updated the the article, gives different number: 17,280 97.5 156.2

It would appear it is a different computer because it "is", that is it seems to be an upgraded one. May this have happened again (second link here, seems to disagree). [While the core number (and peak) is higher as expected, rmax is not. Should that also be higher? Was it miscalculated the first time?] comp.arch (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm actually unsure about this. My theory was they had upgraded it, because I couldn't find the "old" supercomputer on the list. Anyway, the Swedish Wikipedia article still has it listed 126 in 2011 using this source, but there has to be a more recent update... Appreciate the help on this. Gavleson (talk) 15:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on National Defence Radio Establishment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]