Talk:Nibiru cataclysm
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Nibiru collision)
Nibiru cataclysm has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Pole Shift
[edit]I have removed the parenthetical clause "a physical pole shift..." because I read the underlying linked source and she does not state this.Wjhonson (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Bbc article
[edit]according to the bbc there is a hidden planet in the solar system, the section on conspiracy theory needs to be removed in light of this new information.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/66727365 82.9.56.21 (talk) 20:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Planet Nine has nothing to do with the Nibiru rubbish. Planet Nine would not get closer than 200 AU (30 billion km) from the Sun (about 7x farther than Neptune and 4x farther than Pluto at Pluto's farthest distance from the Sun). -- Kheider (talk) 20:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class paranormal articles
- Mid-importance paranormal articles
- WikiProject Paranormal articles
- GA-Class Alternative Views articles
- Mid-importance Alternative Views articles
- WikiProject Alternative Views articles
- GA-Class Skepticism articles
- Mid-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- GA-Class Astronomy articles
- Bottom-importance Astronomy articles
- GA-Class Astronomy articles of Bottom-importance