Jump to content

Talk:Pigeon photography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Pigeon photographer)
Featured articlePigeon photography is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 1, 2012.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 16, 2009Articles for deletionKept
January 14, 2011Good article nomineeListed
January 27, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
May 6, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 12, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that carrier pigeons, known as the Bavarian Pigeon Corps, were fitted with chest-mounted cameras and sent behind enemy lines for aerial reconnaissance by the Bavarian Army in the early 1900s?
Current status: Featured article

2012 BBC Earthflight series

[edit]

The 2004 BBC programme is mentioned - might it also be worth mentioning Earthflight, a six-part series which was broadcast for the first time a few months ago and included masses of footage from bird-mounted cameras. The last of the six programmes in the series was dedicated to showing how the footage was obtained. Details here [1]. It got excellent reviews: [2] [3] [4] review of the 'how they filmed it' final episode 86.133.212.6 (talk) 12:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Albatrosses?

[edit]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_u7VGiMO0U

Wanderer57 (talk) 15:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. You may actually be the first reader who made it to the end of the article. I believe that's the traditional place for making a hoax article so over the top that most readers finally get the joke. Is your post related to that tradition? Hans Adler 15:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I did not read the whole article.
The notion of miniaturizing cameras to lipstick-tube size to be carried by albatrosses was a great touch. I thought some comment was needed. Wanderer57 (talk) 00:56, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article should have been labeled April Fools

[edit]

I think Wikipedia has an obligation to tell its readers if an article doesn't meet its expectations, even in 'joke' form. Though April Fools is fun, and everyone has a good laugh, I still think that serious encyclopedias should be held to a higher standard because people rely on them strongly for resources. Perhaps others will find it petty, but Wikipedia has responsibilities to provide accurate information to its readers 365 days a year.

This article is completely factual. 115.166.41.207 (talk) 04:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I hope the people calling it a hoax were just trying to play an April Fools trick on us. Wnt (talk) 22:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Effect

[edit]

Is there any way this inspired technology that lead to modern animal cameras? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commander v99 (talkcontribs) 17:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Pigeon photography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]