Talk:Yemeni Armed Forces

Military history: National / Asian / Middle East / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Asian military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Yemen Top‑importance

	Yemen portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 21 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Republic of Yemen Armed Forces to Yemeni Armed Forces. The result of the discussion was moved.

Inconsistency

A lot of this article is inconsistent. This includes data on the size of the Yemeni military and the amount of governmental military spending. Andyo2000 (talk) 05:57, 14 November 2009

Yemen isnt poo country, its very rich but unfortunatly and cz of corruption its said to be poor......... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.160.244 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 9 April 2010

you jokers never mentioned that yemen was defeated in the Hanish war and 200 yemeni prisoners were taken. eritrea only left the island after an international court decided the larger island belongs to yemen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.89.24.67 (talk) 11:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MAJOR CLEAN UP NEEDED

This article needs major clean up the inventory of the military is extremely ridiculous most of the weapons mentioned there are completely false as they have never been and nor are being used by Yemen now or by any of its predecessor states, and what's more ridiculous is the numbers claimed to be in its inventory!!! like the M53/59 PRAGA SPAAG system, they claim that Yemen has 5000x of these when only 330-500 of them were ever produced and they were souley used by Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia and its successor states Libya was the only arab country to have a few of these in service and neither Libya nor the two countries which produced it ever exported arms to Yemen, so I'm totally intrigued to were are the people who wrote this article getting this number. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.57.185 (talk) 13:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I've been trying to get some sources for (in particular) the use of US equipment and Soviet what I can only assume is Soviet aid, on Global Security (the stated source) there is no record of equipment before 2005. The figures are just over-blown, if they are correct, it means that Yemen has more Armour than Kuwait which is far richer than Yemen and just under half the strength in Armour terms of Saudi Arabia to the north?! ComradeAlex (talk) 18:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article title change

I have noticed that the other "Military of..." articles are usually redirects to "Armed Forces of (Country name)" or "(Country name) Armed Forces." Should the article title be "Armed Forces of Yemen" or "Yemeni Armed Forces" or something else? Ripberger (talk) 07:34, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Affairs May 2011 quote

"Meanwhile, Mohsen watched nervously as his power base flattened under the weight of the second-generation Saleh men. One by one, Mohsen's close old-guard allies were replaced: In 2007, Saleh sacked Gen. Al Thaneen, commander of the Republican Guard in Taiz. In 2008, Brig. Gen. Mujahid Gushaim replaced Ali Sayani, the head of military intelligence (Ali Sayani's brother, Abdulmalik, Yemen's former defense minister, was one of the first generals to declare support for the revolt against Saleh); the same year, Gen. Al Thahiri al Shadadi was replaced by Brig Gen. Mohammed al Magdashi as Commander of the Central Division; Saleh then appointed his personal bodyguard Brig. Gen. Aziz Mulfi as Chief of Staff of the 27th mechanized brigade in Hadramout. Finally, in early 2011, Saleh sacked Brig. Gen. Abdullah Al Gadhi, commander of Al Anad Base that lies on the axis of Aden in the south and commander of the 201st mechanized brigade. As commander of the northwestern division, Mohsen had been kept busy by an al Houthi rebellion that ignited in 2004, and he became a convenient scapegoat for Saleh when the al Houthis rose up again in 2009 and began seizing territory, leading to a rare Saudi military intervention in Yemen's northern Saada province." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buckshot06 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 28 October 2012

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Military of Yemen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150404053030/http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204422404576594413336931554.html?mod=googlenews_wsj to http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204422404576594413336931554.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark burr

Is he the commander at Yemen now 92.15.98.137 (talk) 16:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) NasssaNser_talk 10:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Yemen Armed Forces → Yemeni Armed Forces – per WP:CONCISE, WP:COMMONNAME Abo Yemen ✉ 15:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well now that the discussion has ended, I’ve tried to move the page as per Wikipedia:Moving a page (the Swapping two pages section), however it leaves a redirect behind. Only a specific group of people can make this move. Please correct me if I’m wrong. 3rbFelix (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@3rbFelix: this discussion hasn't been closed yet. Are you in support of this move? Elli (talk | contribs) 20:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well in that case, yes, I do support this move. 3rbFelix (talk) 15:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: same reason as given in initial proposal. TheDoodbly (talk) 23:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.