Talk:Sanctuary season 1/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Sanctuary (season 1)/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I'll make more copyedits as I go and jot queries below: Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
The main story arc taking place during the season involves the Sanctuary working against the Cabal..- sounds cumbersome, why not just " The main story arc of the season involves the Sanctuary working against the Cabal"
who plot to control all abnormals--> "who seek to control all abnormals"
-
Fortunately, she exposes the imposter (the creature does not know Magnus hates coffee, a fact of which Will would be aware) and kills it--> "Fortunately" (POV) --> "However"
-
However, it soon completely takes her over- sounds a bit colloquial to me. a reword'd be good but nothing comes to mind straightaway.
Weathergirl Amy Saunders (Rekha Sharma) and cameraman Zach Pencer.....- it'd be good to note the different style of this episode, and how it is in newsreel footage and from the newsreporter's POV.- I have done addressed the issues, are there any others? -- Matthew RD 21:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Otherwise looking more polished and on target for GA pass. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Sorry about the delay. Looking alright. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- No worries. Thanks for the review. -- Matthew RD 12:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)