Talk:Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Result was merge.

merge proposal

Proposal to merge Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 into Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act.

Near as I can tell, the two articles share the same subject. I don't have a strong opinion about which should be the surviving title. --joe decker ^{talk to me} 14:28, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - identical subject. Going over other examples in Category:United States federal government administration legislation the "if YEAR" format is used mainly (but not only) when two acts have the same name and only differ by year. I therefore also support the proposed direction of merge. --Muhandes (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Agreed, looks to be the same subject.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Agreed, best have all the information on one topic in the same article. Stidmatt (talk) 23:52, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merge inverted

The merge above was carried out in the wrong direction. The text has been at Statutory Pay-as-You-Go Act since 2011, but I have moved the text to the correct standard name, Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. Because there is history at both titles, {{db-move}} is not an option, so this is a rare case where a copy-and-paste move is warranted. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 04:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]