Talk:Taurus–Littrow
Taurus–Littrow has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 7, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Taurus-Littrow valley, the landing site of Apollo 17 on the Moon, is deeper than the Grand Canyon? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Taurus-Littrow (lunar valley)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 04:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Will review this article pretty soon.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
I have failed the article in this category as the dating in the references differ, there are two styles used.. Also, check that there is a between units and measurements as I see a few units and measurements without one. Also the values in the article must be converted eg. metric to imperial or vice versa. If possible use the convert template, {{convert|8|km|mi}}. You can also ad abbr=on to abbreviate the units, note that units should be spelled out the first time they are used. Also I fixed some prose issues.Issues fixed, pass.- Unit conversions - Done
- Fix ref retrieval dates - Done
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The citations are reliable and each cite provided at the end of the paragraph supports everything withing that paragraph.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Covers everything that can be covered about a lunar valley and is focused on the valley and important people who were once there (Apollo 17).
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Congrats, passed.
- Pass/Fail:
File:Apollo 17 Moon Panorama.jpg to appear as POTD soon
[edit]Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Apollo 17 Moon Panorama.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 16, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-01-16. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Stub crater articles?
[edit]I noticed that each of the relatively insignificant craters in this region is the subject of its own article. However, these are probably never going to grow beyond a stub. Wouldn't it make more sense to merge them into a table within this article? Praemonitus (talk) 15:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class Astronomy articles
- Mid-importance Astronomy articles
- GA-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance
- GA-Class Moon articles
- Mid-importance Moon articles
- Moon task force articles
- GA-Class Solar System articles
- Mid-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force