Talk:Edlington attacks

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Edlington attacks is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

August 2017 - news coverage

The case is back in the news, but I don't think it meets the standard required for article notability.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 08:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should have a look at the AfD (which was closed as keep) which clearly addressed and rejected that argument. AusLondonder (talk) 19:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that the article itself should be deleted. In August 2017, it was reported that one of the brothers was back in prison for having a knife, but since the only source was The Sun (United Kingdom) it ran into problems with sourcing.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 05:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]