This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
The article for this book is expansive, but nowhere is the reason for its inclusion stated. Is it a bestseller? Has it won some awards? The article does not say. Bueller 007 (talk) 19:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are also reliable sources in the references. Almost all of the first 13 references are independent with significant coverage of this topic per GNG. When this article first started it was the reliable sources that determined its notability. For example, this book was reviewed in the New York Times at least twice. Although the book may have won some notable awards, it was the WP:RS that showed it merited inclusion as a stand alone article. Steve Quinn (talk) 07:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}