Talk:Tiger stripe camouflage

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tiger stripe camouflage article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Asian / North America / Southeast Asia / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	United States military history task force

On 8 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Tigerstripe to Tiger stripe camouflage. The result of the discussion was moved.

Nice article

This is a nice and informative little article Peter. ZYou know what they say you learn something new every day. Dustimagic 21:41, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Patterns

Have there been any instances of orange or blue tigerstripe being used by units in urban areas, particually Russian ones? --J.StuartClarke 18:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are some blue-grey Russian patterns, called "Kamysh" I believe. Pjones (talk) 02:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Man- That's Not ACU!

In the 2008 Blockbuster "Iron Man", I believe Tigerstripe camo, colored to represent the ACU pattern, is worn on the soldiers in the film. Look closely at the scenes where Tony Stark is being escorted away from the Weapons Demonstration, and the Weapons demonstration itself. While the Soldiers where ACU vests, the camo on their pants and jacket are what looks like Tigerstripe. Please Heed my observations.Liberater444 (talk) 21:18, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's the new USAF armed ground personel uniform. Koalorka (talk) 22:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 September 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 16:03, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tigerstripe → Tiger stripe camouflage – Almost every single source seen in the article spells it as two words, including the most frequently cited work, the Larson book. So do the results of a general Google search, and a Google Books search. Outside of the Johnson book (which is mentioned in the lead yet is curiously not cited in any in-line citations at all and appears only in the bibliography), no one else seems to use the one-word spelling. Johnson is clearly the outlier and not the WP:COMMONNAME. My proposal includes "camouflage" for WP:NATDIS purposes, but isn't essential if there's consensus it's not needed. The big thing is that the two-word spelling is pretty much universal and the title doesn't reflect that. oknazevad (talk) 12:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:36, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.