Talk:Isotopes of molybdenum
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
It's incorrect!
[edit]Mo-94, Mo-95, Mo-96, and Mo-97 are theoretically stable!
Mo-100 has a half-life of 7.3x10e18 years. Looks like "NuDat" has been revised to 2.6? http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/reCenter.jsp?z=42&n=58 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.176.14.173 (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Sources...
[edit]I always use the following for alerts to new isotopes:
https://people.nscl.msu.edu/~thoennes/isotopes/
If you look at 2015 isotope discoveries, there is a paper listed with Molybdenum 118 (42, 76). As the site allows auto-updates, it could prove to be a useful tool for keeping wiki right up to date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.43.160.239 (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of molybdenum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Possible double beta decay half-life of 98Mo
[edit]This link [1] predicts a very long half-life for the double beta decay of 98Mo (>2.77×1030 yr) 129.104.241.25 (talk) 11:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Perhaps add a note that 100Mo has the shortest measured double beta decay half-life?
[edit]It has a half-life of 7.07×1018 years. There are only 48Ca, 96Zr, and 150Nd that have higher 2β- energies (so high that all of them can theoretically decay by 3β-), but they all have a longer half-life than 100Mo. As for the two nuclides having higher 2β+ energy, 148Gd and 154Dy, their double beta half-lives are impossible to measure. 80.215.155.235 (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)