User:Valjean/Rumor
This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.
![]() | This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page was nominated for deletion on 20 July 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Now undergoing drastic reductions and changes elsewhere. This is a basic repository of all source material, and not all of it will end up in the finished article.
See: #Bottom and notes
- There is enough content gathered here for several articles that can each easily pass GNG.
- Trump Moscow tape rumor and kompromat
- Trump's relationship to Russia
- Trump's vulnerability to blackmail
- Trump and national security
- Possible titles
- Trump Moscow tape rumor and kompromat
- Donald Trump pee tape rumor and kompromat
- Donald Trump golden-showers rumor and kompromat
Lead (temporary heading)
[edit]{{Trump–Russia relations}}
The Donald Trump pee tape rumor relates to kompromat, Donald Trump's vulnerability to blackmail[1][2] by Vladimir Putin and others, and to allegations that Trump is a threat to national security.[3] The rumor started in 2013 and is about an alleged "golden showers" incident at the Ritz-Carlton Moscow hotel when Trump stayed there while attending the 2013 Miss Universe pageant the weekend of November 8–10, 2013.[4] The unproven incident involving prostitutes peeing on a bed, which Trump allegedly orchestrated and watched,[5] was purportedly secretly arranged and recorded by Russian FSB intelligence to be used as kompromat to blackmail Trump.[6][7][8] The incident was allegedly inspired by an earlier visit, together with Aras Agalarov and some Russians, to a raunchy Las Vegas nightclub where Trump's "delighted" reaction to a golden showers show was observed by his group.[9][10][11][12] Years later, first Giorgi Rtskhiladze, and then the Steele dossier's sources, independently of each other, implicated Agalarov and his Crocus Group with responsibility, knowledge, and/or possession of compromising tapes of Trump.[1] The Senate Intelligence Committee report implied that Agalarov/Crocus were part of a Russian intelligence effort to compromise and gain leverage over Trump.[1]
The locally well-known and "infamous pee tape" rumor,[4] which Moscow prostitutes believe is true,[13] began shortly after Trump's travel to Moscow in 2013,[4] and "tales of [Trump's] weird sexual indiscretions" were described as an "open secret" in Moscow.[14] Michael Cohen later testified he learned of the rumor and "other similar allegations" "shortly after the Miss Universe 2013 pageant", and he immediately told Trump.[4] So Trump knew about reports, "separate from" the much later Steele dossier, of "alleged compromising tapes of him in Moscow".[2] Cohen said many others[a] also knew of the rumor and contacted him. Cohen and other Trump associates began quiet attempts to locate and suppress the alleged tapes to protect Trump.[15][16] In spite of all these efforts, when FBI Director James Comey and other investigators later told Trump about the Steele dossier's salacious allegation, he dissembled by not revealing he already knew of the old rumor about tapes of an alleged incident.[17] The rumor remained unknown to the American public until January 10, 2017, when the Steele dossier was published.[18][19] During testimony, Trump's bodyguard[20] was unable to provide an alibi for Trump's activities during the early morning hours of November 9, a "five-hour window" of time suspected of being the time of the incident,[21] and the Senate Intelligence Committee found evidence of "additional social activity" in his room at that time.[2]
Trump has denied the incident and repeatedly falsely asserted that he wasn't in Moscow during that night,[22][23] but Jennifer Rubin has written that the "evidence of the coverup is so plentiful that ordinary people — not unreasonably — will assume guilt."[24] Many doubt him[b] and remain open to the possibility it happened. James Comey, who originally doubted the rumor, came to believe the rumor could be true because he saw Trump's unforced lies as evidence of his "consciousness of guilt".[c] Intelligence agencies assert that Russia possesses more compromising tapes of Trump's sexual behavior from his many trips to Russia.[25][26][27] The CIA reportedly views these reports about kompromat as credible.[27] The leaders of U.S. and British intelligence agencies view Trump as under Vladimir Putin's influence,[28][29] and experienced intelligence personnel view Trump not as a Russian spy, but as an "asset"[28] and "agent of influence",[30] someone who uses his position, power, and influence in the interests of an enemy power.[31] They believe this makes him a serious threat to the national security of both nations.[32][3] Sources report that Russian intelligence believes "they had Trump over a barrel".[33] The constant threat that Putin could release the alleged pee tapes[34][6] has been proposed as one reason why Trump has never criticized Putin,[35] and the fact that actual tapes have not been published means the rumor, true or not, remains unsubstantiated.[36]
The salacious rumor has been widely publicized, documented, and featured in FBI and Special Counsel investigations, Congressional hearings and testimony, books, comedy, lawsuits, Trump's own repeated and unprompted[37] mentions of it, and his lies about the timing of events.[38][d] The timing of Trump's behavior in public that weekend is well-documented, providing the contextual setting for the allegations of kompromat and potential blackmail, the rumor's complicated history, and claims made about it.
Two "golden showers" incidents
[edit]Trump has been connected with two different golden showers incidents,[9][14] and some sources have asserted the first incident in Las Vegas may have inspired the FSB's planning of the alleged incident in Moscow five months later[12] as part of "a Russian effort to gain influence over Trump".[1]
The first incident occurred in June 2013 at a raunchy Las Vegas nightclub, where the group of Russians with Trump could observe him watching a golden showers performance "with delight".[10] Jane Mayer quotes a source close to Steele who commented on the similarity of the two golden showers incidents: "It does suggest that there is some kind of track record here. This behavior was not unheard of in Trump's circle. So in that sense, it adds to the credibility of the dossier."[9] Jonathan Chait describes how the incident at the nightclub shows that "Trump is comfortable with gross sexual behavior and can be blackmailed. ... He has had a lot of affairs. He has gone to great lengths to keep them quiet — which is to say, he can be blackmailed. And he is not averse to a sexually unconventional milieu."[11]
The second incident allegedly occurred five months later, in early November 2013, in a Moscow hotel suite, and was allegedly "arranged" and "monitored" by the FSB.[6] That incident is the subject of the unsubstantiated rumor.[36] Although the rumor predated the Steele dossier by several years, the dossier provides the most detailed description of the rumor, which has been described as the "most notorious" of all the dossier's allegations.[9][39][40]
"The Act" nightclub in Las Vegas (June 2013)
[edit]On June 15, 2013, five months before the alleged pee tape incident in Moscow, Trump visited Las Vegas and met with Putin-connected oligarch Aras Agalarov, the Azerbaijani businessman who arranged the Trump Tower meeting. He is the owner of Crocus Group and the Crocus entertainment center in the Moscow suburbs, where the Miss Universe pageant was held. He was accompanied by some of his family and a group of Russians.[41] (Persons associated with Crocus Group were later linked to the responsibility for the existence,[e] knowledge, and/or possession of kompromat in the form of "compromising tapes of Trump", otherwise known as the "pee tape".[15][7])
The meeting was ostensibly held to sign the contract and announce[2] that the 2013 Miss Universe pageant would be held in Moscow, for which Agalarov was willing to pay Trump $20 million.[42][19] Later, Trump got his money, but Agalarov lost about $10 million on the whole affair, a sizable sum, even for a billionaire.[43] Although financing suggestions had included the involvement of "governments or tourism departments as well as private entities, the Agalarovs indicated that the financing for the Moscow pageant would be strictly private".[2] Concerns were later raised that the arrangement "may have left Trump indebted to foreign influence". Senator Al Franken testified that "The Russians have a history of using financial investments to gain leverage over influential people and then later calling in favours. We know that."[42]
A Lawfare report described how the Senate Intelligence Committee report implied another reason[f] for Agalarov's Las Vegas meeting with Trump:
So the first point to bear in mind is that the Trump Tower meeting was arranged by a Russian oligarch with ties to organized crime and to Putin.
The second key point is that the Agalarovs had been cultivating Trump for some time. Trump met the Agalarovs in 2013 through efforts to bring the Miss Universe pageant, which Trump owned, to Moscow. This alone is nothing new. But the report also suggests—without stating outright—that the event, including the involvement and support of the Agalarovs, was likely a Russian effort to gain influence over Trump.[1]
During a dinner with the Agalarov group,[44] Trump's bodyguard, Keith Schiller, approached Rob Goldstone (a music producer and Emin Agalarov's publicist) and asked him if the group had plans after the meal. Goldstone told Schiller that one of Emin's associates "was an investor in a club called The Act and that the group planned to go there. According to Goldstone, Schiller responded by telling Goldstone that 'Mr. Trump wants to come.'"[2][9][41] The club's featured acts, described in detail by Jane Mayer,[9] included simulated sex acts of bestiality, grotesque sadomasochism, and girls simulating urinating on a "professor".[41] The acts were so debauched that a Nevada judge later "ordered the club to scale back on some of its more risque performances",[45] and it closed five months later on October 12, 2013.[46]
The group of nearly 50 guests[47] included Aras Agalarov, his son Emin, Ike Kaveladze, Rob Goldstone, Donald Trump, Michael Cohen, Keith Schiller, and others.[41] Trump also took Miss USA Nana Meriwether, Miss Universe Olivia Culpo, and former Miss Alabama Katherine Webb with him.[47]
They arrived after midnight[41] and stayed "for several hours",[45] "enjoying The Act's performances from the center of the action, on the floor beneath the main stage".[47] Trump was photographed there and,[41] according to Cohen, Trump watched a golden showers performance "with delight".[10] Madeleine Aggeler believes Trump's "delight" at the sight "could be considered a form of urolagnia, which is sexual excitement associated with the sight or thought of urine and/or urination".[48]
Seth Abramson, in his book Proof of Collusion, shared the concerns about Trump's vulnerability to blackmail expressed by Lawfare and the Senate Intelligence Committee.[1] He noted that "the Agalarovs couldn't have missed" Trump's enthusiastic reaction at the sight of women peeing, and that his "delighted" reaction "may have informed the activities they wanted prostitutes to perform in front of Trump in his hotel suite in Moscow in November 2013, just 120 days after the risqué performance in Las Vegas".[12] Steele later wondered if there was a connection between the Las Vegas nightclub visit and the alleged incident at the Ritz-Carlton Moscow hotel, but "he didn't know".[14] The dossier alleges the incident was "arranged/monitored by the FSB".[6]
Schiller later told the Senate Intelligence Committee that "he had no recollection of going to any club" in Las Vegas. He also repeatedly answered "no recollection" to Committee questions about many things that occurred during the weekend in Moscow when the pee tape incident allegedly occurred.[2]
The Ritz-Carlton Moscow hotel (November 2013)
[edit]Trump was in Moscow to attend the 2013 Miss Universe pageant on Saturday evening November 9, but he was also there to network with powerful Russians in Moscow. He had a very busy schedule and was constantly surrounded by people. The night of Friday-Saturday was the only full night he was in Moscow, and the pee tape incident allegedly occurred in the hotel's Presidential Suite early Saturday morning, well after midnight. The next evening, he attended the Miss Universe pageant and then drove directly to the airport without going back to his hotel.[41] A full timeline is included below, and the Senate Intelligence Committee report covers "Trump's Travel to Moscow in 2013" on pages 655-662.[2]
The alleged incident
[edit]The most detailed description comes from the Steele dossier, and, with its seven Russian sources,[49] it is the dossier allegation with the "most sources attached to it, all of them independent".[50] Later testimony revealed that the dossier's description harmonized with how those who knew the original rumor remembered it. When the dossier was published in January 2017, both Michael Cohen and Giorgi Rtskhiladze, who both knew the original rumor, recognized how the dossier described the tapes they had been chasing for several years.[g]
The rumor alleges that when Trump visited Moscow, he stayed in the Presidential Suite of the Ritz-Carlton hotel where President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama had stayed.[6][51] There, because he "hated" Obama so much, he employed "a number of prostitutes to perform a 'golden showers' (urination) show in front of him"[52][53][54] in order to defile the bed used by the Obamas four years earlier.[17] The incident is alleged to "have been arranged/monitored by the FSB"[6] and was reportedly recorded by the FSB[5] as kompromat so they could blackmail him.[7][8]
Below is the dossier's description (bolded for the reader in ¶ 3) within its context:[6]
- COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/080
- US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE DONALD TRUMP'S ACTIVITIES IN RUSSIA AND COMPROMISING RELATIONSHIP WITH THE KREMLIN
- Former top Russian intelligence officer claims FSB has compromised TRUMP through his activities in Moscow sufficiently to be able to blackmail him. According to several knowledgeable sources, his conduct in Moscow has included perverted sexual acts which have been arranged/monitored by the FSB
- However, there were other aspects to TRUMP's engagement with the Russian authorities. One which had borne fruit for them was to exploit TRUMP's personal obsessions and sexual perversion in order to obtain suitable 'kompromat' (compromising material) on him. According to Source D, where s/he had been present, TRUMP's (perverted) conduct in Moscow included hiring the presidential suite of the Ritz Carlton Hotel, where he knew President and Mrs OBAMA (whom he hated) had stayed on one of their official trips to Russia, and defiling the bed where they had slept by employing a number of prostitutes to perform a 'golden showers' (urination) show in front of him. The hotel was known to be under FSB control with microphones and concealed cameras in all the main rooms to record anything they wanted to.
- The Moscow Ritz Carlton episode involving TRUMP reported above was confirmed by Source E, [REDACTED BY BUZZFEED NEWS], who said that s/he and several of the staff were aware of it at the time and subsequently. S/he believed it had happened in 2013. Source E provided an introduction for a company ethnic Russian operative to Source F, a female staffer at the hotel when TRUMP had stayed there, who also confirmed the story. Speaking separately in June 2016, Source B (the former top level Russian intelligence officer) asserted that TRUMP's unorthodox behavior in Russia over the years had provided the authorities there with enough embarrassing material on the now Republican presidential candidate to be able to blackmail him if they so wished.
- 20 June 2016
A "five-hour window" of time
[edit]Several writers have examined timelines of the weekend and concluded that November 9 is the date that the alleged golden showers incident would have occurred,[d] with Martin Longman writing: "The incident, if it occurred, would have happened the night before the pageant when he did stay at the hotel."[17]
The night of Friday-Saturday was the only full night Trump was in Moscow, and because the exact time of the alleged golden showers incident is not documented, sources have speculated it might have occurred during this available time that was not well-documented. Trump had a very busy schedule and was constantly surrounded by people, except during the early Saturday morning hours of November 9, hours described by Rob Goldstone as a "five-hour window" of time.[21]
According to Comey, the time needed for the described incident to occur was minimal, which allowed for other things to also happen during those hours. Comey wryly described his thoughts at one of the times Trump was lying to him:
[Trump said] that he'd never stayed overnight at the hotel, he'd just changed clothes there and went to the Miss Universe pageant. ... I remember thinking, "Well, should I say that, 'As I understand the activity sir, it doesn't require an overnight stay. And given that it was allegedly the presidential suite at the Ritz Carlton, I would imagine you could be at a safe distance from the activity--'" all these things are bouncing around my head. But instead of saying it, it just led me to think, 'The world's gone crazy.'"[38]
There are a number of factors that make those hours the most likely time of the alleged incident:[d]
- During his testimony, Schiller was unable to provide an alibi for Trump's activities the rest of that night: He testified that after Trump went to bed alone, he "eventually left Trump's hotel room door and could not say for sure what happened during the remainder of the night".[20] Some say this left "open the possibility that the encounter may have occurred after Schiller left".[55]
- Doubts have been raised by multiple sources about the truthfulness of Schiller's claim[h] that he refused the offer to send five prostitutes "to Trump's hotel room that night",[41] as he was known to aid, not block, Trump's secretive affairs with women.[i]
- The sincerity of Trump's denials and excuses has been questioned by many commentators,[b] and his long history of lying about uncomfortable truths, including the circumstances surrounding the pee tape rumor, creates a problematic "credibility gap" for him.[60] Comey said these lies reflected Trump's "consciousness of guilt".[c]
- The Senate Intelligence Committee report notes that "Several items on the hotel room bill may indicate additional social activity following the birthday party."[2]
- Rob Goldstone "said he was in Trump's company [from the time Trump landed until he departed], except for a five-hour window that Trump was afforded to sleep early Saturday morning".[21] Trump has bragged that under normal conditions he needs little sleep, anywhere from 90 minutes to four hours.[61] In this case, the eight-hour time difference meant that 1:30 a.m., Moscow time, was like 5:30 p.m. in Ashville, a time he would normally be wide awake.[62]
- Martin Longman wrote: "Did Russian women show up at the Ritz Carlton that night? There are several reasons to believe they did, including that Christopher Steele was able to partially corroborate a rumor that he learned of from a conversation that took place in New York City several years later by having sources talk to staff at the hotel in Moscow. I also think it's interesting that Keith Schiller felt compelled to admit that the offer was made, even if he denied that Trump accepted it."[17]
- David Geovanis claimed he gave Trump a tour of Moscow, and, according to him, there was partying and possibly blackmailable activity. The exact time for this tour is unknown, but it could have happened anywhere in Moscow, including at the hotel and at this time.[2] (See #Number of city tours.)
- Some other alleged activities could also fit into these hours
Two other incidents involving Trump and prostitutes allegedly occurred in the hotel that weekend. Because doubts have been raised about Schiller's claim he rejected[h] the offer of prostitutes, these incidents are covered here:
Trump was seen in the lobby with a group of prostitutes who wanted to go up to his room without signing in. Trump was defending them in a loud "row"[j] with hotel security. The confrontation was observed by witnesses. The report of the incident came from an editor at The Guardian:[12]
The Guardian has heard 'there are witnesses to a confrontation in the hotel lobby, when security wanted the girls to sign in and DJT [Donald Trump] objected. ... [O]ne [witness] is [a] former Trump Organization [employee]. ... '
Over the course of the next year there will be several reports of witnesses who saw a confrontation in the Ritz-Carlton Moscow lobby between hotel staff and a group of women who wanted to go up to Trump's room without signing in. Paul Wood of the BBC, in an article for The Spectator, will say he was told by an unnamed source that a hotel employee and an American tourist saw the row happen.
He was also videotaped in a Ritz Carlton elevator "involved with several women" described as "hostesses". Shortly after the Miss Universe contest, two Marriott International executives discussed an elevator security camera video.[63]
One of the Marriott executives who was involved in the conversation—previously a manager of the Ritz Carlton Moscow—had clearly seen the video, which allegedly showed Trump in an elevator involved with several women who the discussant implied to be 'hostesses.' The executive who had seen the video had asked the other, more senior, executive what to do with the recording. The former executive said the two discussants then left to continue the conversation in a more private location, and he did not hear anything further.[1]
Possible motivations
[edit]Several sources have discussed the possible motivations for Trump's intense hatred of Obama, and thus the alleged choice to defile the bed.
Jaclyn Friedman mentions racist and disrespectful motivations:
It is, of course, scandalous and hella racist that he made a point to defile the bed the Obamas slept in. Indeed, it is important to distinguish the difference between what's going viral and what's in the document. The former is the concept of someone being sexually excited by pee, which is a sexual preference some people have. The document, on the other hand, contains alleged evidence that President-elect Donald Trump intentionally disrespected the President of the United States, and that he did so in a way that is reminiscent of a long controversial wartime tradition that violates military law.[64]
Michael Cohen also asserts that Trump's hatred of Obama is racist and envious:[65][66]
'His hatred for Barack Obama is plain and simple: he's Black, he went to Harvard Law, he graduated at the top of his class, he's incredibly articulate, he's all the things that Donald Trump wants to be,' Cohen said. 'And he just can't handle it. So what do you do if you're Donald Trump and you can't handle it? You attack it.'
John Sipher, a foreign policy, intelligence, and national security expert, has pointed out that nothing indicates that Trump did anything other than watch and instruct the prostitutes. Unlike what some sources have alleged, the dossier does not say he was involved in any sexual acts with the prostitutes, nor that they urinated on him. Sipher said that Trump just "sought to denigrate Obama" because he hated him: "[Trump's] policies are almost exclusively about overturning and eradicating anything related to President Obama's tenure', just as ancient rulers 'sought to obliterate the existence of their predecessors. ... Is it inconceivable that he would get some satisfaction from a private shaming of the former President?"[5]
ABC News traces the bad blood to Trump's constant pushing of baseless Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories (aka "birtherism"). Obama criticized Trump for doing so and later roasted Trump at the 2011 White House Correspondents' dinner.[67][68]
Jonathan Chait wrote: "We also know Trump harbored a burning resentment of President Obama in the wake of Obama's mocking him at the 2011 White House Correspondents Dinner. And many reports of Trump's decision-making suggest that the strongest consideration in any decision is the chance to defile or destroy something associated with Obama."[69] Chait elaborated on Trump's motivation:
Obama hatred is the lodestar of Trump's often confused policy-making. "It's his only real position," a top European diplomat told BuzzFeed last year. "He will ask: 'Did Obama approve this?' And if the answer is affirmative, he will say: 'We don't.'" Even bizarrely self-defeating actions ... seem to be motivated by a desire to defile his predecessor's legacy. Getting prostitutes to pee on the bed Obama slept in seems to be very much in character.[11]
Weekend timeline (November 7–10, 2013)
[edit]Because Trump has repeatedly lied by denying he stayed overnight even once on the trip,[23][70] a detailed, but incomplete, timeline is produced below. Details not directly related to the rumor are also included for situational and background context, as well as evidentiary purposes, as they all bear on Trump's unseemly behavior in public,[71][72] his denials and lies, and potential kompromat. Trump had a "hectic"[41] schedule, and, with the exception of one "five-hour window" of time,[21] his activities were public, all seen and documented by numerous witnesses and sources, including social media, journalists and their posted videos, his own selfies and tweets, friends and associates, officials, hosts, chauffeurs, police escorts, bodyguards, his translator, and testimony to investigators. Russian intelligence is alleged to have recorded some of his private behavior.
- November 7 (Thursday)
- Thursday evening, Trump attended the 95th birthday tribute to evangelist Billy Graham in Asheville, North Carolina.
- Flight records show he left Asheville at 9:15 p.m. and flew to Moscow on Phil Ruffin's Bombardier Global 5000 jet.[70]
- November 8 (Friday)
- After a flight of "about 11 hours",[73] Trump arrived at Vnukovo International Airport at 6:15 a.m., Moscow time, which is eight hours ahead of Asheville. Flight records and social media posts "seem to put him in the Russian capital during the day of Friday and the night of Friday-Saturday."[73]
- When he arrived in Russia, he was met by a translator hired by the Agalarovs, and he used the same translator "for the duration of the trip".[2]
- He then drove less than an hour to the Ritz-Carlton hotel, where he booked in.[70][74]
- The Agalarovs had "arranged for Donald Trump to stay at the Ritz Carlton Hotel", which was rated a "high counterintelligence risk environment", with Russian agents on staff, surveillance of rooms, and many prostitutes.[2]
- Schiller testified that he "did not know who reserved the hotel rooms, and did not recall being involved in reviewing the hotel selection".[2]
- Schiller testified that he "did not recall taking any security precautions regarding Trump's room other than looking to see that there was no one else in it".[2]
- After arriving, "Trump attended a morning meeting about the pageant at his hotel, the Ritz-Carlton."[75]
- Schiller said that at some point during this meeting, someone offered to send five prostitutes "to Trump's hotel room that night".[41] He later said the location of the offer may have been the hotel.[2]
- The Senate Committee noted Schiller's inconsistent and unclear recollections: "It is not clear, based on Schiller's recollection, where or when the offer was made, or by whom. ... Schiller said that the offer may have taken place at the hotel, however he did not have a clear recollection of the timing or location of the offer."[2]
- "Multiple sources said the offer ... came from a Russian who was accompanying Emin Agalarov."[76]
- Schiller said that he took the offer as a joke and rejected it,[75] but doubts have been raised by multiple sources about the truthfulness of Schiller's claim that he refused the offer.[h]
- Later that day, Trump ate a gala lunch at the Nobu Moscow restaurant. There he met with Russian businessmen, including Herman Gref, the chief executive of Sberbank.[70][77]
- He next went to a theater in Crocus City Hall to inspect contestants, where, according to his contractual and usual practice at Miss Universe pageants, he could "overrule the selection of judges and pick the contestants he wanted among the finalists". This was usually done in a very specially-equipped room set up for him backstage. Among other demands, "He required unscented soap and hand towels—rolled, not folded." Miss Universe staffers explained how Trump would frequently "toss out finalists", especially those he deemed "too ethnic or too dark-skinned" and "replace them with others he preferred". On occasion, Trump "would reject a woman 'who had snubbed his advances'".[41]
- Late that evening, Trump attended Aras Agalarov's 58th birthday party at 10:00 p.m.[70]
- November 9 (early Saturday morning).
- He left the birthday party early Saturday morning and, at about 1:30 a.m., Moscow time, returned to his hotel room with his bodyguard, Keith Schiller.[41] For Trump, it was like 5:30 p.m. in Ashville, a time he would normally be wide awake.[62]
- While Trump and Schiller were walking back to Trump's hotel room, Schiller said he told Trump about the earlier offer to send five prostitutes "to Trump's hotel room that night",[41] and Schiller said they laughed about it. After Trump went to bed alone, Schiller said he stood outside Trump's door for a time and then left.[20]
- Doubts have been raised by multiple sources about the truthfulness of Schiller's claim that he refused the offer.[h]
- Several sources[d] suggest the pee tape incident occurred in these hours.
- See #A "five-hour window" of time above for factors and possible activities the rest of the night.
- November 9 (Saturday, day and evening)
- In the morning, Trump had another "hectic" day ahead of him.[41] The previous evening, Trump had agreed to help Emin with a new music video, based on The Apprentice, "but it had to be early — between 7:45 and 8:10 in the morning".[41] Facebook posts showed Trump at the Ritz in the music video shoot.[74] Emin Agalarov has said that Trump "was only present at the music video filming for 10 minutes".[2]
- After the music video, Trump was taken on at least one tour of Moscow. The number of tours is uncertain. (See #Number of city tours.)
- Then he attended a press conference with 300 reporters.[74]
- That evening, right after the press conference, he went to the Miss Universe contest with its red carpet event and broadcast.[70][74]
- November 10 (early Sunday morning)
- This was followed by an after-party scheduled to start at 1:00 a.m., November 10. Trump arrived early at 12:30 a.m.[2]
- There, according to Hungarian celebrity Kata Sarka,[71] Trump, who was "surrounded by bodyguards", publicly grabbed her and propositioned her: "Trump gave her his business card, private telephone number, and hotel room number." She turned him down. Trump was married to Melania at the time.[83][84] Abramson cited this kompromat occurrence, disclosed before the Steele dossier was even written, as evidence that Trump was lying about being discrete in Moscow, that he was publicly careless, and that his deceptive denials showed "consciousness of guilt".[83][c]
- Trump also publicly grabbed another young woman, a 26-year-old aspiring Armenian actress, Edita Shaumyan, but she also rejected his advances.[k]
- He then left the after-party and drove directly to the airport.[l][41][85] Ruffin's Bombardier left the airport at 3:58 a.m., Moscow time.[70]
- Trump arrived at Newark Liberty International Airport, near New York City, when it was still Sunday morning, at 4:11 a.m. local time.[70]
Number of city tours
[edit]Both Aras Agalarov and David Geovanis claim to have given him tours to Trump while he was in Moscow.[74] Aras Agalarov said he toured possible building sites with Trump,[74][77] and David Geovanis indicated his tour with Trump included partying and potentially blackmailable activity.[2]
David Geovanis was cited as saying that "he showed Mr. Trump around Moscow during the Miss Universe pageant in 2013. He did not get into specifics, but intimated that there was partying and that Mr. Trump should be nice to him in light of the information he had." The report added that "The latter part of this statement may have been made in jest."[2]
The exact time for the tour with Geovanis is unknown, but, according to sources for the weekend's events, there were only two known timeslots where it could have happened, either during the early morning "five-hour window" of November 9, when the pee tape incident allegedly occurred, or at some time after the filming of the music video. It could have happened anywhere in Moscow, including at the hotel. It could also have been separate from the tour with Agalarov, or the three men could have been together. Sources do not clarify the issue. The article by Silver and Pismennaya, with their heading of "Moscow Tours", and not saying who gave him the tours, or even if it was the "same tour Trump tweeted about", indicates the possibility of more than one tour.[74]
The tour with Agalarov was after the early morning music video of November 9, well before the Miss Universe contest that evening. "Separately, Aras Agalarov said he showed Trump around Moscow during the trip, inspecting different sites with an eye toward building a Trump Tower together, though it's unclear whether this is the same tour Trump tweeted about."[74][70][86]
That afternoon, Trump tweeted that he "was just given a great tour of Moscow", but he did not say who gave him that tour.[74]
Change of rooms
[edit]There are some unexplained questions about Trump's room and a possible room change. Regardless of where he stayed in the hotel, many sources (including the 2013 hotel sources that long predate the June 2016 dossier memo) claim that Trump stayed in the Presidential Suite, and the golden showers incident is alleged to have happened in that suite. It is only after the dossier was published in 2017, that the Ritz Carlton Moscow produced documents indicating Trump did not stay in that suite, even though it was reserved for him and the hotel's employees said he stayed there:[2]
According to documents produced by Ritz Carlton Moscow, Trump was initially booked in the Presidential Suite, but that reservation was later canceled, and Trump was moved to a different room, a Carlton Suite. Despite Trump's scheduled arrival on November 8 being known significantly in advance, his room was reserved, and paid for, for an additional two nights prior to arrival, starting on November 6. The Committee was not able to determine why this advance reservation took place.
The Durham special counsel investigation says: "[T]he Office obtained records from the Ritz Carlton Moscow that reveal that Trump was a guest at the hotel in 2013, but did not stay in the Presidential Suite then or at any other time."[87] Hotel staff contradicted those records: When Charles Dolan Jr. was given a tour of the Presidential Suite in June 2016,[88] a "staff member informed them that Donald Trump had stayed in the Suite, but did not mention any sexual or salacious activity".[87][89]
The Agalarovs reserved the Presidential Suite at the Ritz-Carlton hotel, but when someone suggested that Trump could stay at the Intercontinental Hotel to save money, Emin Agalarov demanded compliance with his wish that Trump stay at the Ritz Carlton: "trump will stay at the ritz comply with me", and he "requested that room options be sent to him".[2]
Credibility
[edit]Comey met with Trump several times, and Trump repeatedly lied specifically about the time when the incident could have happened, even though no one had mentioned that time. This caused Comey to doubt the sincerity of Trump's denials. Comey said these lies reflected Trump's "consciousness of guilt",[c] leading him to believe the pee tape might be real.[90]
Trump's deceptive reactions to the pee tape rumor have raised more questions in people's minds while answering none,[37][91][92] so many have reacted, analyzed, and written about the following questions: If he was innocent, why did he repeatedly lie and, without any prompting, keep bringing up the subject?[37][93][94] Why did he lie so specifically (and complicatedly[m]) about the exact time when the incident could have happened when no one had yet mentioned it?[90] Why did he act guilty?[c] If Trump knew the rumor was false, why did he and his closest allies act as if the pee tape really existed?[n]
Trump has repeatedly denied the pee tape rumor, calling it phony, false, and fake, but the sincerity of his denials and excuses has been questioned by many commentators.[b] The "evidence of the coverup is so plentiful",[24] and his long history of lying about uncomfortable truths, including the circumstances surrounding the pee tape rumor, together create a problematic "credibility gap" for him.[60]
Ashley Parker described why Trump's lack of credibility undermines his denials of the "Russia tape":
Trump has cried 'fake news' so frequently that his angry denials have lost their wallop. ... For the president, the 'fake' modifier frequently refers to news reports that he wishes were not true rather than those that are actually false. And the White House has an enormous credibility gap, with a long record of vociferously denying news reports ... that are proved true days later. ... Such incidents have allowed the tantalizing possibility that the Russia tape just might exist to percolate on the fringes of respectability.[60]
Trump lied by saying he didn't overnight in Moscow even once, but there is plenty of evidence that he did stay there the night prior to the Miss Universe contest.[101][102] His lies have been described as obstruction of justice.[103] Trump's fake alibi was easily debunked by flight records, congressional testimony from his bodyguard, his own tweets, photographs, and social media posts.[104]
Bess Levin described Trump's alibi as "a total fabrication" and pointed to how that lie increased the credibility of the pee tape rumor. She described how some have tried to explain why Trump treats Russia with "respect and deference" by pointing to his "business interests" and "obsession with oligarchs", but she points to another possibility:[105]
Others have consistently come back to the idea that Russia has something on the president that he doesn't want to get out. Could it be, say, video evidence that he witnessed Russian prostitutes peeing in a bed once slept in by his predecessor? Reason and logic tells us this cannot be possible ... and yet, on Monday, a new report nudged the impossible a hair closer in the direction of credibility!
Josh Marshall makes the point: "In any court, this lie would be entered as evidence of his lack of credibility on the main point. There's zero question he lied about this repeatedly and to multiple people."[22]
Ben Schreckinger noted how "A conscious effort by Trump to mislead the FBI director could lend weight to the allegation [in the dossier] that Trump engaged in compromising activity during the trip that exposed him to Russian government blackmail."[104]
According to Peter Zeidenberg: "It has also likely caught the eye of special counsel Robert Mueller. ... False statements to Comey about the trip could demonstrate that Trump has 'consciousness of guilt'. That could bolster a legal case against Trump."[104]
Trump's meetings with Comey
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/James_Comey_official_portrait.jpg/200px-James_Comey_official_portrait.jpg)
Comey's first private meeting with Trump was at Trump Tower after the election, on January 6, 2017, when Comey briefed Trump about "the sensitive material in the Steele reporting". The Mueller report's "Footnote 112" mentions the meeting: "Comey's briefing included the Steele reporting's unverified allegation that the Russians had compromising tapes of the President involving conduct when he was a private citizen during a 2013 trip to Moscow for the Miss Universe Pageant."[19] There is no indication that Trump ever revealed to Comey or other investigators that he already had prior knowledge of the rumor from long before the Steele dossier was written. Instead, the dossier became the distracting focus of his attacks.[106][107][108]
In fact, Trump already knew about reports, "separate from" the much later Steele dossier, of "alleged compromising tapes of him in Moscow":
The Committee's Report also shows that prior to and during the campaign, Trump was informed of alleged compromising tapes of him in Moscow. These allegations are separate from Christopher Steele's reports, which were not used to support the Committee's work. The Committee found that the Russian intelligence services clearly engage in the collection of compromising information for leverage, and that there may be substance to some of the allegations regarding Trump, which leaves open an ongoing concern about Russian influence operations.[2]
Comey said that Trump, without prompting, "brought up the pee tape on four separate occasions":[37] "For about the fourth time, he argued that the golden showers thing wasn't true."[108] Even though the pee tape allegation never says Trump needed the sexual services of prostitutes, only that he instructed them to defile the bed, he again asked: "Can you imagine me, hookers?" and "whether he seemed like a guy who needed the service of prostitutes".[108]
Bloomberg News described how Trump twice told Comey that he did not stay overnight in Moscow:
According to Comey's accounts of his 2017 meetings with the president, Trump said the Moscow trip was so quick that his head never hit a pillow — even for one night. Trump fired Comey on May 9, 2017. The first denial came over dinner at the White House in late January 2017. "He said he arrived in the morning, did events, then showered and dressed for the pageant at the hotel," and then left for the event, Comey wrote. ... On the second occasion in February 2017, Trump "explained, as he did at our dinner, that he hadn't stayed overnight in Russia during the Miss Universe trip".[70]
In April 2018, Trump publicly disputed that he had issued such a denial to Comey and made it appear that Comey was the one who made the statement: "He said I didn't stay there a night. Of course I stayed there. I stayed there a very short period of time but of course I stayed."[109][110]
In his book A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership,[111] Comey wrote: "In an apparent play for my sympathy, he added that he has a beautiful wife and the whole thing has been very painful for her. He asked what we could do to 'lift the cloud.'"[112] Trump asked him to have the FBI investigate the pee tape rumor "because he wanted to convince his wife that it wasn't true. ... He brought up what he called the 'golden showers thing' ... adding that it bothered him."[112]
[Trump said], 'If there's even a one percent chance my wife thinks that's true, that's terrible.' And I remember thinking, how could your wife think there's a one percent chance you were with prostitutes peeing on each other? I'm a flawed human being, but there is literally zero chance that my wife would think that was true. So what kind of marriage to what kind of man does your wife think there's only a 99 percent chance you didn't do that?[90]
Responding to Trump's request for an FBI investigation of the dossier and the rumor, "Comey said he told Trump that it ultimately was up to the president to decide whether to open a probe but cautioned that doing so could 'create a narrative' that the FBI was investigating him."[106]
James Clapper, who was then the Director of National Intelligence, also received a request from Trump to publicly say the dossier was bogus. Clapper then emailed Comey: "[Trump] asked if I could put out a statement. He would prefer of course that I say the documents are bogus, which, of course, I can't do."[107]
Comey did not know if the "golden showers" rumor was true, but he came to believe it was possible. In a special edition of ABC's "20/20", he told George Stephanopoulos: "I honestly never thought these words would come out of my mouth, but I don't know whether the current president of the United States was with prostitutes peeing on each other in Moscow in 2013. It's possible, but I don't know".[90][113][114]
Comey continued:
And then he launched into-- I didn't ask about the business with the prostitutes, but he launched into an explanation as to how I should know that wasn't true and that he remembered now, from talking to friends who had been with him, that he'd never stayed overnight at the hotel, he'd just changed clothes there and went to the Miss Universe pageant.
I don't know whether any of this is true, but this is what he said. And then went right back without staying overnight. And then he said, "Another reason you know it's not true is I'm a germaphobe. There's no way I'd let people pee on each other around me." And that he caught me so much by surprise I actually let out an audible laugh and-- 'cause it was just one of those-- I was startled by it.
And-- and I remember thinking, "Well, should I say that, 'As I understand the activity sir, it doesn't require an overnight stay. And given that it was allegedly the presidential suite at the Ritz Carlton, I would imagine you could be at a safe distance from the activity--'" all these things are bouncing around my head. But instead of saying it, it just led me to think, "The world's gone crazy."[38]
Doubts have been raised about Trump's claim to be germaphobic, although he does like to wash his hands "as much as possible": "Does anyone really believe that story? I'm also very much of a germaphobe, by the way." This contradicted an interview in 2015 when he stated: "'I'm not germaphobic,' he said, when asked if he would kiss babies and shake hands on the campaign trail."[115] Loofbourow noted how Trump "tried to convince Comey that he, a man who allegedly had unprotected sex with a porn star he'd just met, was a 'germaphobe.'"[94] John Sipher clarified how the claim of germaphobia is irrelevant because the dossier does not say the prostitutes pissed on Trump, just on the bed.[5]
List of disputed statements to Comey
[edit]- Trump didn't overnight in Moscow even once.[23][70][105][102][104][c]
- "I went there for one day for the Miss Universe contest, I turned around, I went back."[116]
- Comey described how "Trump said the Moscow trip was so quick that his head never hit a pillow — even for one night. ... He said he arrived in the morning, did events, then showered and dressed for the pageant at the hotel."[70]
- Trump told Comey that he "had spoken to people who had been on ... the trip with him and they had reminded him that he didn't stay over night in Russia for that". Peter Zeidenberg "suggested that investigators could also probe whether Trump had in fact conferred with others who 'reminded' him he did not stay the night in Russia. ... It's very likely there would be no corroboration for that story, which makes the whole thing look like a big fat lie."[104]
Other excuses and concerns
[edit]- He is a germaphobe.[115]
- He didn't need the service of prostitutes.[108]
- He has a beautiful wife.[70]
- It bothered him if "there's even a one percent chance my wife thinks that's true".[90][117]
- He wanted to convince his wife that it wasn't true.[112]
- He said he assumed he was always being recorded when in Russia, thus implying that he was not vulnerable[o] to blackmail.[11][70][118]
Contradictions
[edit]Contrary to his claim, Trump did overnight in Moscow for one full night, the night the incident allegedly happened.
- Flight records show Trump stayed overnight in Moscow the full night before the pageant. The next day, he attended the pageant in the evening and then a Miss Universe after-party. He left the party early and, without returning to his hotel, left Moscow early in the morning at 3:58 a.m.[70]
- In a radio interview, Trump said: "I really loved my weekend, I called it my weekend in Moscow. But I was with the top level people, both oligarchs and generals, and top of the government people."[119]
- The testimony of Keith Schiller, his longtime bodyguard, confirms he overnighted the night before the pageant.[20]
- The Senate Intelligence Committee documented that "Several items on the hotel room bill may indicate additional social activity following the birthday party."[2]
- Rob Goldstone "said he was in Trump's company [from the time Trump landed until he departed], except for a five-hour window that Trump was afforded to sleep early Saturday morning".[21]
- Thomas Roberts, the host of the pageant, confirmed "that Trump was in Moscow for one full night and at least part of another".[91]
- Social media posts show he was in Moscow during the early Saturday morning hours of November 9.[70]
Accusations of "nitpicking"
[edit]In his 2020 book Compromised: Counterintelligence and the Threat of Donald J. Trump, Peter Strzok, former FBI deputy assistant director of counterintelligence, has analyzed all the ways Trump is compromised, and he has also commented on Trump's weird denial to Comey. Immediately after Comey returned from Trump Tower after informing Trump of the dossier and its salacious allegations, Strzok and other FBI leaders were together, and they discussed Trump's "nitpicking" reaction to Comey's briefing:[120]
For some in the room, Trump's reaction was inconclusive, because he was vague in his response, neither confirming nor denying it when Comey told him. I didn't agree. My experience is that people almost universally react with anger and a flat denial if confronted with a false accusation, particularly an outrageously sleazy one. It seemed telling that Trump was nitpicking over whether he ever paid for sex and not whether the episode took place at all in a hotel room in the heart of Russia. Speaking to those around the table, I likened it to accusing a bank robber of a heist involving a shotgun. Instead of denying involvement in the robbery, I said, the thief says, There was no shotgun. I've never touched a shotgun. (pp. 194-195)
Trump's activity timeline documents that certain things were either possible or impossible for him to do at certain times, and, instead of just denying he did anything wrong and moving on, as pointed out by Strzok, his consciousness of guilt[24] led him to use nitpicking lies to hide (by omission) something related to that time period from those he was lying to, as noticed by many writers.[b]
Trump is known to use many types of lies, including lies of omission[121] and paltering,[95] which is the selective use of truthful statements in a deceptive manner.[96]
For lies of omission to succeed, the deceiver neglects relevant information that would change a target's mistaken belief. For paltering to succeed, the deceiver not only neglects relevant information, but also fosters a mistaken belief in the target through the artful use of truthful statements.[97]
His lies about the timing in Moscow used an advanced type of lying by using both types at the same time;[97] his lies omitted (by denying) the fact he spent one whole night in Moscow (when the incident allegedly did happen), while paltering by mentioning the fact he spent only part of the next night (when the incident could not have happened).[d]
Another factor caught the eye of writers; even though the dossier only says "a number of prostitutes", Trump has put a number on it,[122] thus creating more interest. James Bickerton, a reporter for Newsweek, wrote: "Donald Trump has raised eyebrows online after again denying he engaged in a 'golden shower' with 'four hookers' in a Moscow hotel room, as alleged in the 2016 Steele dossier, even though the document doesn't give a number for those it claims were involved." One respondent said: "I think he just admitted it was '4' hookers." Another wrote: "With 4 hookers? He is giving a lot of detail for someone who knows nothing about it."[92]
Shakespearean behaviors
[edit]Several sources have discussed Trump's guilty behavior in relation to the psychology of guilt, and they specifically discuss how two Shakespearean examples apply to him: Macbeth describes what has been called "consciousness of guilt",[c] and Hamlet mentions how "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."[37][123]
Consciousness of guilt
[edit]Trump's phony alibi has been described as evidence of his "consciousness of guilt".[c]
In a CNN town hall interview with James Comey, Anderson Cooper addressed Trump's claim that "he did not stay overnight in Moscow around the time of the Miss Universe pageant in 2013". Cooper: "Do you think it's significant that the President lied to you twice?" Comey: "It's always significant when someone lies to you, especially about something you're not asking about. It tends to reflect a consciousness of guilt."[23]
Jennifer Rubin described how Trump's fake alibi "could be strong evidence of guilt": "We return to the quintessential Trump dilemma: If he is innocent, why does he behave so much like a guilty man?"[n]
An innocent man likely would not insist that the FBI disprove a ludicrous allegation, nor worry that his wife would find it believable. ... In this case, evidence of the coverup is so plentiful that ordinary people — not unreasonably — will assume guilt. Trump’s penchant for lying, exaggerating, distorting and misremembering in ways that invariably line up with his unfounded assertions might finally do him in.[24]
"Doth protest too much"
[edit]Some writers have noted that Trump appears to incriminate himself because he repeatedly, and unforced, keeps mentioning the rumor at his campaign events. This habit of his led Margaret Hartmann, Senior Editor for the Intelligencer, to write an article entitled "Does Trump Want Me to Think He's Into Golden Showers?" She then cited Shakespeare's Hamlet: "Similarly, 'the lady doth protest too much' are words Shakespeare wrote that he probably never thought would be applicable to a national leader accused of urolagnia, but here we are."[37]
Hartmann described how, at an October 2021 National Republican Senatorial Committee retreat, "Trump informed a room full of GOP senators this week that he's not into that sort of thing, although absolutely no one had asked about it."[37] Unprompted, he told them: "I'm not into golden showers. You know the great thing, our great first lady — 'That one,' she said, 'I don't believe that one.'"[126] Among Hartmann's many observations for why he shouldn't say such things, she noted that this "only raises more questions" like "[I]f Melania was so quick to reject this report about her husband’s sexual proclivities, why did he previously raise concerns that she would believe the story?"[37]
Trump did the same thing on November 7, 2022, at a midterm rally in Ohio supporting GOP Senate candidate J. D. Vance,[127] and at a Fort Dodge, Iowa rally on November 18, 2023, leading Megan Sheets, the U.S. Executive Editor for The Independent, to note that the rumor refuses "to go away in part because he keeps bringing it up".[122]
Seth Meyers pointed out the self-incriminating nature of "bringing up the claims so many years after the fact":[124]
Dude, not even Democrats think about the pee tape anymore! But when you come out six years later and deny a story everybody forgot about, I have to think maybe it's true. If someone came up to you at your 20th high school reunion and said, 'By the way, I'm not the one who put the sardines in your locker,' then you just solved that case.
Mentioning Trump's "unprompted denial of the Steele dossier", Stephen Colbert said:[93]
At a donor retreat last week, Trump denied, sans context or prompting, that he enjoys so-called 'golden showers'.
'Um, no one asked you?' Colbert reacted. 'And when no one is bringing up the thing that you famously denied, you shouldn't bring it up either. You don't hear Paul McCartney beginning his concert by saying, 'Hello New York, I did not secretly die in 1966 and get replaced with a lookalike from Canada, eh.'
Dan Savage, who writes the syndicated relationship and sex-advice column Savage Love, also discussed Trump's habit of repeatedly mentioning and denying the pee tape. In his column for The Stranger, Savage wrote an article entitled "The Pee Tape Is Real *", with an asterisk, where he discussed Trump's denials to Comey, and the dubious nature of those denials, all in the context of Savage's own "specific area of expertise: kinky motherfuckers":[123]
Trump may or may not have been in close proximity. But an appeal to germaphobia does not get one off the urophilia hook—quite the opposite, in fact. A germaphobe is somewhat likelier to be into filthy, gross, or germy things than a non-germaphobe. ...
And a person who is ashamed of their kinks and is in a panic to cover them up is highly likely to point to the very thing that makes their kink so arousing in the first place. Instead of, 'That's not something that turns me on so it's not something I would do,' they say, 'I couldn't be into that because I'm a germaphobe/feminist/proud gay man/powerful dude.' The kinkster subconsciously longs to be exposed—another violation—because deep down we long to be known, to be seen for who and what we really are. But only a few of us are lucky enough to have a special prosecutor to make it happen.
So, yeah, the pee tape is real. Trump keeps telling us so himself.
He ended the article by citing Shakespeare and explaining the asterisk with a "* Runner up headline: 'The President of the United States Doth Protest Too Much, Peethinks.'"[123]
Characterizations of rumor's origins and effects
[edit]The fact that Trump learned of the rumor from Michael Cohen shortly after the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in 2013[2] did not prevent him from lying about it and claiming the 2016 Steele dossier originated the rumor, and he dissembled by not telling Comey or other investigators that he had known of the rumor since long before the dossier was started.[17]
It was only after the Steele dossier's publication in 2017 that Trump publicly mentioned the rumor and focused his ire on the dossier as if it were the creator of a new rumor. Some other sources did the same.[128][129] Trump and some sources falsely claim Steele "made-up"[129] the rumor or that it was "born" because of the dossier.[128]
Cohen and Hope Hicks had discussed the old rumor with Trump before the dossier,[130] and her lawyers falsely described the dossier's much later mention of the rumor as "a rumor of a videotape, now known to have originated with the Steele dossier, involving Mr. Trump in Moscow with Russian prostitutes".[131] Trump has unsuccessfully sued Steele's firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, alleging that the dossier's "reports of his alleged sexual activity in Russia were 'false, phoney or made-up'".[129]
Howie Carr, an American conservative radio talk-show host, repeated John Durham's dubious insinuation against Charles Dolan Jr.,[p] the source for a different allegation in the dossier,[88] by writing that Dolan "most likely made up the pee-tape story", an unevidenced claim vehemently denied by Dolan.[132]
Sean Hannity, a conservative conspiracy theorist and Fox News host, falsely claimed fewer people voted for Trump in the 2016 election because they heard about the "pee tape" rumor, which he called "election interference", even though it was not public knowledge until 63 days after the election.[133]
Criticisms of bodyguard
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Keith_Schiller.jpg/200px-Keith_Schiller.jpg)
Keith Schiller, Trump's personal bodyguard for nearly two decades, has been described as "one of Trump's most loyal and trusted aides" and "a constant presence at Trump's side".[80][134] He also became known as a Trump fixer, i.e., a person who tries to conceal their client's potential scandals, often using questionable, if not illegal, methods.[81][82] Several women have described how part of his job was to facilitate Trump's affairs with them.[i]
Schiller has said[79] that he refused the offer of five prostitutes,[41] but sources have pointed out that he has a history of lying for Trump and aiding, not blocking, Trump's secretive affairs with women,[i] and they have raised doubts[1][59][78] about whether Schiller's story is true or whether he was lying for Trump.[1]
A Lawfare summary of the final Senate Intelligence Committee report points out how a "conspicuous footnote" in the report that cites Cohen's testimony about Schiller, raises doubts about the honesty[h] of Schiller's story:
While Schiller told the committee that he and Trump laughed off the offer and the liaison never occurred, a conspicuous footnote leads the reader to question whether Schiller is, in fact, telling the truth: "Cohen has testified that, 'Keith is the ultimate protector, and he was [Trump's] bodyguard, his attache for many, many years. And he was the keeper of Mr. Trump's secrets. So, for example, if he was going to text a female, he would have Keith do it on his phone.' Cohen has also testified that he has seen Schiller lie for Trump."[1]
Ashley Feinberg also questions Schiller's denial as he was known to be an intermediary and facilitator[i] of Trump's secretive affairs with women:
According to NBC, Schiller said that he took the offer as a joke and immediately told the man making the proposition, 'We don't do that type of stuff.' Schiller's claim not to do that type of stuff should be considered in the light of the fact that in 2011, adult film star and director Stormy Daniels had told In Touch Weekly that, whenever she needed to contact Trump during the course of their 2006 affair, she'd go through Schiller: 'Keith was always with him. That's how I got in touch with him. I never had Donald's cellphone number. I always used Keith's.'[59]
Cenk Uygur doubted Schiller's honesty and said: "You have to ask the question: Why would you lie about that if you didn't do the 'golden showers' thing? And then he got his personal security guy to also lie for him, but that lie also exposed what really happened."[78]
Bodyguard's recollections
[edit]Under questioning by the Senate Intelligence Committee, Schiller repeatedly had problems recalling specific events:[2]
- Las Vegas: "Schiller said he had no recollection of going to any club."
- Moscow:
- "Schiller told the Committee he did not recall who picked them up at the airport, or who drove them, or what vehicle they were in, or where they went."
- "He also did not recall doing any vetting of the transportation entities or arrangements for Donald Trump, or having any communication with the Agalarov's organization to coordinate."
- "Schiller claimed he had no recollection of the event at Nobu."
- "Schiller told the Committee he did not know who reserved the hotel rooms, and did not recall being involved in reviewing the hotel selection."
- "Schiller did not recall taking any security precautions regarding Trump's room other than looking to see that there was no one else in it."
- "Schiller told the Committee he did not recall how many nights they were in Russia, or what hotel they stayed at."
- "Schiller told the Committee he had no recollection of a music video being filmed."
He was not alone: "A number of witnesses told the Committee their memories were unclear."[2]
The Senate Committee noted that Schiller's recollection about the offer of five prostitutes was inconsistent and unclear: "It is not clear, based on Schiller's recollection, where or when the offer was made, or by whom."[2] At first, he said the offer was made at a morning meeting,[41] but he later said the offer may have been made at the hotel.[2]
Contest organizer
[edit]Yulia Alferova (Yulya Klyushina) worked for the Agalarovs and helped "organize Trump's Miss Universe contest".[13] She was also Trump's hostess during the weekend and posted photos of herself and others together with him on her social media accounts. In January 2017, when investigators asked her about the pee tape, she tried to defend him and equivocated about where Trump spent the night: "I am confident that nobody has any video of Trump with prostitutes. ... See, he came on November 9, worked all day, partied all night, and left. I am not even sure if he spent the night at the Ritz."[13] Like Trump's phony alibi, she left out all of November 8 and the early morning hours of November 9, only mentioning the day and night of the Miss Universe pageant.
The Senate Intelligence Committee report's "Footnote 2510" mentioned her tweets, one shortly after the Miss Universe pageant, showing she had foreknowledge, long before the American public, of Trump's planned presidential run. She promised Russian support for his candidacy:[2]
On January 22, 2014, Klyushina wrote on social media that, 'I'm sure @realDonaldTrump will be great president! We'll support you from Russia! America needs an ambitious leader!'; On January 28, 2015, Klyushina announced on Twitter that Trump would be running for President of the United States. Tweet, @AlferovaYulyaE, January 28, 2015. The Committee has no insight into the nature of Klyushina's knowledge of these matters or what prompted these statements.
This Russian support was later manifested in the "sweeping and systematic" Russian interference in the 2016 elections. The Committee had "significant concerns regarding [Artem] Klyushin" and devoted a whole section to him and his associates: "Artem Klyushin, Konstantin Rykov, and Associates". They were involved in election interference efforts in Ukraine and the United States.[2]
Problems in attempts to find the tapes
[edit]Sources have alleged that certain people were evasive, lied about, and/or tried to cover-up and spin the news of Trump's alleged activities in Moscow, including what Judge Cooper described as "efforts to suppress tapes involving alleged sexual escapades on the part of the former President".[16] These activities included searching for the tapes, possibly having them, trying to catch and kill them, trying to purchase them, or maybe even publish them. Some of those alleged to have been involved in related activities were Aras Agalarov/Crocus Group, Donald Trump, Michael Cohen, Giorgi Rtskhiladze, Keith Schiller, Hope Hicks, Yulia Alferova, Harvey Levin, David Pecker, Dylan Howard, Hustler magazine, and Penthouse magazine:
- Aras Agalarov/Crocus Group: Both the dossier and Rtskhiladze, independently of each other, associated responsibility, knowledge, and/or possession of compromising tapes of Trump with Agalarov and his Crocus Group.[15][7][135] Giorgi Rtskhiladze described not merely the matter of possession of the tapes, but the responsibility for their existence, when he "assessed that if compromising material existed, Crocus Group [the Agalarovs] would likely be responsible".[e]
- Donald Trump: He has repeatedly lied by denying he stayed overnight even once on the trip.[23][70] The "evidence of the coverup is so plentiful"[24] that many doubt Trump.[b]
- Michael Cohen: He tried to find and get possession of the tapes.[15]
- Giorgi Rtskhiladze's contacts with Cohen:
- "In 2014 or 2015 Cohen asked a friend, Giorgi Rtskhiladze, to find out if the tape was real."[2]
- "On October 30, 2016, three weeks after Hope Hicks asked him[136] to track down the footage in question, Michael Cohen received a text from Giorgi Rtskhiladze reporting that he had successfully "stopped flow of some tapes from Russia". Rtskhiladze later told Mueller's investigators that these were compromising tapes of Trump, and Cohen told investigators he had spoken to Trump about the issue."[15]
- Keith Schiller: His honesty about events in Moscow has been questioned by multiple sources.[h]
- Hope Hicks: Speaking of the pee tape rumor, she testified that she asked Michael Cohen to learn more and report back to her:[q] "I wanted to make sure that I stayed on top of it before it developed any further, to try to contain it from spiraling out of control."[136] She also testified that she knew of the pee tape three months before the publication of the Steele dossier.[130]
- Yulia Alferova: She equivocated about the timing of Trump's activities in Moscow and repeated Trump's phony alibi, leaving out a whole day of his stay.[13]
- Harvey Levin, founder of TMZ: He knew of the pee tape and contacted Cohen about it.[2] Cohen may have had other contact with him:[q] "Hicks had been told that TMZ might have access to the tape, and she knew that Cohen was very close to Harvey Levin, the gossip outlet's founder."[130]
- David Pecker and Dylan Howard of National Enquirer: They knew of the pee tape and contacted Cohen about it.[2] They are known to perform catch and kill operations, including knowing of hush money payments, to help Trump cover up his affairs with Stormy Daniels, Karen McDougal, and possibly others.[137][138][139] According to prosecutors, "the trio" of Trump, Cohen, and Pecker had a formalized catch and kill arrangement which they used in sensitive cases:
The trio agreed to an arrangement in which Pecker would act as the campaign's 'eyes and ears' to identify negative stories, according to prosecutors, after which he would procure their exclusive rights and never publish. Prosecutors claim Trump and Cohen agreed to then 'reimburse' Pecker's company, National Enquirer publisher American Media Inc., known as AMI.[139]
- Hustler magazine: "Before the election, Larry Flynt, publisher of the pornographic magazine Hustler, put up a million dollars for incriminating tape of Mr Trump."[27]
- Penthouse magazine: Offered "$1 Million For a Trump Piss Tape". Penthouse wrote:
However, while many media outlets are content running a story based on conjecture and rumor, we at Penthouse are committed to the value of getting the story right rather than getting it first. So we are offering up to $1-million to secure exclusive rights to the FSB tapes documenting Trump’s Russian hotel hijinks. After all, seeing is believing.[27][140]
Vulnerability to blackmail
[edit]Lots of content here:[141]
Trump's lies, actions, and association with certain people "compromised" him, gave the Russians "leverage" over him,[1] and made him vulnerable to blackmail.[o] As a Lawfare report put it:
Trump's personal and business history in Russia provided a significant opportunity for kompromat. Such material was very likely collected. There is less evidence that it was ever deployed, though Trump's mere awareness of his vulnerability gives rise to substantial counterintelligence concerns.[1]
The Senate Intelligence Committee report implied "that the Agalarovs had been cultivating Trump for some time" and were trying to "gain influence over" him.[1]
- Trump's history as a playboy,[142][143][144] and especially his many divorces and lawsuits, have revealed that he is accustomed to adultery, paying to cover it up, and paying for sex.[57] He even tried to hand cash to Playboy Playmate of the Year[145] Karen McDougal after sex and offered porn star Jessica Drake $10,000 for "her company".[69][57][146]
- Trump's association with David Geovanis makes him "vulnerable to kompromat operations".
- Trump's behavior shows he is vulnerable to blackmail: "The central thesis of the dossier seems increasingly likely: that Trump's long history of alleged affairs make him uniquely susceptible to blackmail."[147][o]
- In the Ritz-Carlton lobby, he was observed with a group of prostitutes. He was loudly defending them from hotel security who were trying to prevent the prostitutes from going up to Trump's room without signing in.[12]
- In a Ritz-Carlton elevator, he was filmed with some prostitutes.[2][63]
- On his last night in Moscow in 2013, he separately accosted, without success, two young women in a very public and physical manner by grabbing them and propositioning them. This became public knowledge long before the dossier.[r]
Key kompromat players
[edit]Roles of Agalarovs and Goldstone
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/62/Aras_Agalarov.jpeg/200px-Aras_Agalarov.jpeg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/88/%D0%AD%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD_%28%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B8_%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82-%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0_%E2%80%94_2021._%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%81_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B5%D1%82_%D0%B4%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%B9%29.jpg/200px-%D0%AD%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD_%28%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B8_%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82-%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0_%E2%80%94_2021._%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%81_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B5%D1%82_%D0%B4%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%B9%29.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Rob_Goldstone_in_DC.jpeg/200px-Rob_Goldstone_in_DC.jpeg)
Aras Agalarov (owner of Crocus Group), his son Emin, and Emin's publicist Rob Goldstone, were in close connection with Trump during times when kompromat on him was allegedly collected, such as their June 2013 visit to "The Act" nightclub in Las Vegas, Trump's weekend in Moscow in November 2013, where Agalarov was his host, and later when Goldstone, acting for Emin, arranged the 2016 Trump Tower meeting. According to Adam Davidson, Trump's mere association with them would compromise him and make him susceptible to blackmail, due to the informal sistema and blat system of corruption under which they operate.[35]
The Agalarovs/Crocus Group controlled much that happened around Trump in Moscow in November 2013. They "designated the security guard", provided a translator, and reserved the Presidential Suite at the Ritz-Carlton hotel, but when someone suggested that Trump could stay at the Intercontinental Hotel to save money, Emin Agalarov demanded compliance with his wish that Trump stay at the Ritz Carlton: "trump will stay at the ritz comply with me", and he "requested that room options be sent to him".[2] Both the dossier and Rtskhiladze, independently of each other, implicated Agalarov and his Crocus Group with responsibility, knowledge, and/or possession of compromising tapes of Trump. Giorgi Rtskhiladze "assessed that if compromising material existed, Crocus Group [the Agalarovs] would likely be responsible".[e]
Rob Goldstone "said he was in Trump's company [from the time Trump landed until he departed], except for a five-hour window that Trump was afforded to sleep early Saturday morning".[21] That was also the available time frame when the pee tape incident allegedly occurred.[d]
In 2016, as part of the Agalarov's and Russia's continued efforts to cultivate Trump and create more kompromat to be used against him,[f] Goldstone[148] and Emin Agalarov arranged[1][149] another kompromising event involving Trump, the 2016 Trump Tower meeting, which Trump likely knew about before it happened.[150][151]
Before the meeting, the Russian government falsely said it would share "dirt" on Clinton.[152] In reality, there was no "dirt" on Clinton, and the mention of the word "dirt" was familiar bait to Donald Trump Jr., who knew from George Papadopoulos[153][154] that the Russian government had promised to help the Trump campaign by releasing "dirt" on Clinton. His response showed he was expecting more of this form of aid.[155] Goldstone emailed Donald Trump Jr. and wrote: "this 'is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump.' Trump Jr. responded in an email: 'If it's what you say I love it."[156] The meeting was really a secret attempt to get Donald Trump to lift the Magnitsky Act sanctions imposed against Russia and certain oligarchs,[157] something Trump was willing to do for Putin.[158]
Acting CIA director John E. McLaughlin explained how Trump's lying about his attempts to get a Trump Tower Moscow deal with Agalarov, and his keeping the Trump Tower meeting in New York secret for nearly a year, compromised Trump and gave Putin "leverage" over him. McLaughlin said the "seeds of blackmail" came from "the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, even if nothing came of it": "If we had never learned of it, Russia would have had in its kit bag an email from [Donald Trump Jr.] saying 'I'd love some dirt on Hillary from Russia.' And could have threatened to reveal it at any time. Those around Trump clearly are naive about all of this."[159]
Frank Figliuzzi, former assistant director for counterintelligence at the FBI, described how Trump's lies about the Trump Tower Moscow deal with Agalarov were "the definition of the Russian word kompromat". Jennifer Rubin wrote that "Russians knew Trump was lying and Trump knew that they knew. That's leverage."[159] Lawfare said those lies "compromised" Trump and gave the Russians "leverage" over him.[1]
In June 2018, Emin put out a music video[156] that clearly alludes to the pee tape and kompromat. It featured "impersonators playing Donald Trump, Ivanka, Jared Kushner, Hillary Clinton, Mark Zuckerberg, and Stormy Daniels, a series of briefcase handoffs, surreptitious meetings, and bikini-clad Miss Universe contestants".[156] Mother Jones described the video as "an over-the-top trolling of the Trump-Russia investigation",[156] whereas Sonam Sheth described it as "trolling Trump over the allegation".[160]
Aras Agalarov
[edit]Aras Agalarov is an Azerbaijani businessman, oligarch, and real estate magnate who has close ties to Vladimir Putin,[19] Yuri Chaika (described as the "Master of Kompromat"[149]), and many forms of organized crime. The Senate Intelligence Committee wrote:
The Agalarovs have significant ties to Russian organized crime and have been closely affiliated with individuals involved in murder, prostitution, weapons trafficking, kidnapping, extortion, narcotics trafficking, money laundering and other significant criminal enterprises. Some of those activities have extended outside of Russia, including to the United States.[43]
The fact that a sitting President had close business ties with such people has been criticized.[43]
Agalarov has many ties to Trump, including financial,[161] and was involved in Trump's plans to build a Trump hotel in Moscow. Michael Cohen was Trump's representative in most of his business dealings with Agalarov in Russia, and the Senate Intelligence Committee wrote that Giorgi Rtskhiladze "warned him twice against working with the Agalarovs, saying they were 'really rough'".[1][43]
Dossier sources reported that Trump had participated in "sex parties" in St. Petersburg,[135] and that Agalarov "would know most of the details of what the Republican presidential candidate had got up to" in St. Petersburg.[7] Mueller reported how Giorgi Rtskhiladze, independently of the dossier, described how "compromising tapes of Trump" were "rumored to be held by persons associated with the Russian real estate conglomerate Crocus Group" [owned by Agalarov].[15]
Years later, when referring to the alleged pee tape made of Trump with prostitutes in November 2013, Rtskhiladze indicated that the making of such a tape could be the consequence for any indiscretions that occurred around Agalarov/Crocus.[16] Rtskhiladze knew that, as Agalarov was a close associate of Putin and Yuri Chaika, anything improper was likely to be recorded. The Senate Intelligence Committee report notes that Rtskhiladze was the one who "assessed that if compromising material existed, Crocus Group [the Agalarovs] would likely be responsible."[e] The Committee connected the dots by attaching "Footnote 4282" to "Crocus Group [the Agalarovs] would likely be responsible":[2]
4282 Aras Agalarov's associate, Yuri Chaika, the longtime former Prosecutor General of Russia, has a history of utilizing compromising information. [source[149]] Most notably, in the late 1990s, Chaika was reportedly involved in the use of a video recording to oust a Russian government official who was investigating corruption in the Russian leadership. The recording, which was made public, showed the official in a compromising situation with two women. Chaika himself replaced the ousted official, who claimed that the tape was falsified. Putin, who was the head of the FSB at the time, 'authenticated' the tape involving the women.
David Geovanis
[edit]David Geovanis is a "Moscow-based American businessman with longstanding ties to President Donald Trump".[162] He also "has ties to Kremlin-linked oligarchs, several of whom are sanctioned by the United States. Some of Geovanis's contacts are also associated with Russia's intelligence and security services, and some are involved in Kremlin foreign influence operations."[2]
The Senate Intelligence Committee extensively describes Geovanis and his statements about Trump's alleged sexual activities in Russia, including the following:[2][1]
Geovanis has claimed that, during Trump's travel to Russia, both in 1996 and 2013, Geovanis was aware of Trump engaging in personal relationships with Russian women. Geovanis has suggested that the Russian government was also likely aware of this information. ... Geovanis also has a reputation in Moscow for a pattern of conduct regarding women that could make him, and potentially those around him, vulnerable to kompromat operations.[2][45]
Geovanis implied that Trump had a sexual relationship with "two young Russian women",[75] a story described by the Senate Intelligence Committee ("younger women" and "two beautiful young women"). The Committee also implied that Geovanis may have told that story to Jeffrey Toobin: "There are indications that Geovanis may have also told this story to the press. A February 2018 story in The New Yorker includes an anecdote that closely resembles the one allegedly told by Geovanis."[2]
Geovanis also implied that Trump had a sexual relationship with a former Miss Moscow.[63] Luke Harding and Julian Borger describe how:
Trump 'may have begun a brief relationship with a Russian woman' he met at the Geovanis party. Her name is blacked out. One source of the information is Theodore Liebman, an architect who lived in Moscow and New York in the 1990s, and who traveled to Russia with Trump to the event.[163]
Geovanis, who "may have attended the pageant",[2] intimated that he could blackmail Trump. According to William McFarren:
To the best of my recollection, Mr. Geovanis said that he showed Mr. Trump around Moscow during the Miss Universe pageant in 2013. He did not get into specifics, but intimated that there was partying and that Mr. Trump should be nice to him in light of the information he had.[2]
The report added that "The latter part of this statement may have been made in jest."[2]
Dossier mentions of vulnerability to blackmail
[edit]The dossier describes Trump's potential vulnerability to blackmail in various ways, including his knowledge of it and how it is conditioned on continued "voluntary" cooperation with the Kremlin:[o]
Each allegation should be read as "Sources allege that" (and then the allegation).
- ... that Trump was vulnerable to blackmail from Russian authorities[164][165] for paying bribes and engaging in unorthodox and embarrassing sexual behavior over the years,[52][5][166] and that the authorities were "able to blackmail him if they so wished".[52][5][166][167] (Reports 80, 95, 97, 113)
- ... that the Kremlin had promised Trump they would not use the kompromat collected against him "as leverage, given high levels of voluntary co-operation forthcoming from his team".[165][168] (Report 97)
- ... that Trump had explored the real estate sectors in St. Petersburg and Moscow, "but in the end TRUMP had had to settle for the use of extensive sexual services there from local prostitutes rather than business success".[7][8] (Report 95)
- ... that witnesses to his "sex parties in the city" had been "'silenced' i.e. bribed or coerced to disappear."[7][8] (Report 113)
- ... that Trump had paid bribes in St. Petersburg "to further his [business] interests".[7][8] (Report 113)
- ... that Aras Agalarov "would know most of the details of what the Republican presidential candidate had got up to" in St. Petersburg.[7] (Report 113)
- ... that Trump associates did not fear "the negative media publicity surrounding alleged Russian interference" because it distracted attention from his "business dealings in China and other emerging markets" involving "large bribes and kickbacks" that could be devastating if revealed.[169][170] (Report 95)
- ... that "DIVEYKIN discusses release of Russian dossier of 'kompromat' on TRUMP's opponent, Hillary CLINTON, but also hints at Kremlin possession of such material on TRUMP."[6] (Report 94)
- ... that "However, the Kremlin official close to IVANOV added that s/he believed DIVEYKIN also had hinted (or indicated more strongly) that the Russian leadership also had 'kompromat' on TRUMP which the latter should bear in mind in his dealings with them."[6] (Report 94)
- ... that "As far as 'kompromat' (compromising information) on TRUMP were concerned, although there was plenty of this, he understood the Kremlin had given its word that it would not be deployed against the Republican presidential candidate given how helpful and co-operative his team had been over several years, and particularly of late."[6] (Report 97)
The Steele dossier describes Trump's vulnerability to blackmail as a key factor that made the Rosneft offer of a large brokerage fee to Carter Page possible. He, as Trump's representative, was offered the brokerage of up to a 19 percent stake in Rosneft.[165][171][172][173][174] It has been described as a carrot and stick scheme, in which the carrot was the brokerage fee ("in the region of tens and possibly hundreds of millions of dollars"), and the stick was blackmail over purported "damaging material on Trump" held by the Russian leadership.[175]
National security risk
[edit]Trump is seen by many, especially in the intelligence community, as a national security risk, and the pee tape rumor is part of that problem.
Compromised national security vs salacious acts
[edit]While the media has tended to focus on the sexual nature of the alleged scandalous incident, others have focused on how national security was compromised by the far more serious scandal and kompromat Trump created when he allegedly "intentionally disrespected the President of the United States" and became blackmailable.[64]
Vera Papisova wrote: "If allegations are true, and the Russian government does have compromising financial and personal information about Donald Trump, then we should be more concerned about whether or not this will have an effect on his foreign policy — and not laughing at his sexual preferences."[64]
Jaclyn Friedman points out the "big scandal": "People are so focused on the 'scandalous' sex act that they're missing the treason. The big scandal here, which is getting lost in all the pointing and laughing, is that, if these allegations are true, he's compromised U.S. sovereignty by being either blackmailed or blackmailable by Russia."[64]
Paul Wood, BBC journalist, wrote: "The significance of these allegations is that, if true, the president-elect of the United States would be vulnerable to blackmail by the Russians. I understand the CIA believes it is credible that the Kremlin has such kompromat - or compromising material - on the next US commander in chief."[27]
On the subject of kompromat, Bruce Ohr testified to the House Judiciary and House Oversight committees that on July 30, 2016, Steele told him that "Russian intelligence believed 'they had Trump over a barrel' ... [a] broader sentiment [that] is echoed in Steele's dossier".[33][176] Paul Wood described the source as "another Danchenko contact, a 'former senior intelligence officer now a Kremlin official'. This was later said to be no less than a former head of Russia's foreign intelligence services. This source did not talk specifically about the 'pee tape' but, Danchenko told Steele, he said they had sexual kompromat on Trump going back years. 'We've got him over a barrel.'"[40]
Cultivation, compromise, kompromat, and blackmail
[edit]Trump appears vulnerable to at least three types of kompromat (compromising material): those of a sexual, financial, and corrupt practices nature. These vulnerabilities go back many years, far before his 2015–2016 presidential campaign. The Russians and their allied intelligence agencies appear to have tried to collect kompromat on him for at least 40 years.[25]
According to former KGB major Yuri Shvets, Russia has been trying to cultivate Trump as a Russian intelligence "asset", not an actual "agent" (spy), for many years. He became the target of a joint KGB and Czech intelligence services spying operation after he married Czech model Ivana Zelnickova[177] and has been cultivated as an "asset" since 1977: "Russian intelligence gained an interest in Trump as far back as 1977, viewing Trump as an exploitable target."[25] Shvets describes why "Trump was the ideal target for Soviet recruitment. 'He was the perfect combination of extremes: Extreme vanity, extremely low IQ, extreme vulnerability to flattery, and of course, extremely greedy.'"[178] Trump was just one of many targeted by the KGB: "The Russians were trying to recruit like crazy and going after dozens and dozens of people." This time it paid off, and the KGB celebrated its success.[179]
Three years later, Trump finished his first large building project, the Grand Hyatt New York hotel, furnishing it with "hundreds of televisions from a Russian immigrant who was a KGB spotter and who highlighted him as a potential asset, being an up-and-coming businessman".[179] "Then, in 1987, Trump and Ivana visited Moscow and St Petersburg for the first time. Shvets said he was fed KGB talking points and flattered by KGB operatives who floated the idea that he should go into politics." Shvets compared the young Trump to the Cambridge Five, where early recruitment bore fruit for Russia much later.[177]
For the KGB, it was a charm offensive. They had collected a lot of information on his personality so they knew who he was personally. The feeling was that he was extremely vulnerable intellectually, and psychologically, and he was prone to flattery.
This is what they exploited. They played the game as if they were immensely impressed by his personality and believed this is the guy who should be the president of the United States one day: it is people like him who could change the world. They fed him these so-called active measures soundbites and it happened. So it was a big achievement for the KGB active measures at the time.[177]
He was "groomed by the Russians to pursue a political career",[178] and after he returned to the United States, he immediately began to seek the Republican nomination for president. He also began publishing unorthodox and anti-American sentiments.[177] Trump was not viewed as an actual spy but as an asset who is a "useful idiot". Kyle Cunliffe, a lecturer in intelligence studies, puts it this way:
We're talking about Trump being a self-interested businessman who's happy to do a favour if it works to his own best interests – and that includes staying out of jail. ... Simply put, an agent is a partner for life, whereas an asset is a friend with benefits. And, most likely, if Trump has been one of the two, it's the latter.[180]
The Senate Intelligence Committee looked at Trump's potentially blackmailable activities in Russia in 1996[181] and interviewed several witnessess, including Leon Black,[182] who, like Trump and their mutual friend Jeffrey Epstein, also had problems with various sexual misconduct accusations:
Two decades before he ran for president, Donald J. Trump traveled to Russia, where he scouted properties, was wined and dined and, of greatest significance to Senate intelligence investigators, met a woman who was a former Miss Moscow.
A Trump associate, Robert Curran, who was interviewed by the Senate investigators, said he believed Mr. Trump may have had a romantic relationship with the woman. On the same trip, another Trump associate, Leon Black, told investigators that he and Mr. Trump 'might have been in a strip club together.' Another witness said that Mr. Trump may have been with other women in Moscow and later brought them along to a meeting with the mayor.
Mr. Trump was married to Marla Maples at the time.[63]
The Committee also investigated the threats of kompromat about Trump that "emerged in 2016", as well as those that "predated both Steele's memos and the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign":
Russia has a longstanding practice of collecting compromising information to attempt to influence or coerce prominent individuals, posing a potential counterintelligence threat. Allegations that the Russian government had compromising information on then-candidate Trump emerged in 2016, and were more fully made public in early 2017, through memos produced by Christopher Steele. Separate but related allegations, which were not public, in some cases predated both Steele's memos and the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. Collectively, the allegations raised a potential counterintelligence concern, that Russia might use compromising information to influence the then-presidential candidate's positions on relations with Russia. The Committee sought, in a limited way, to understand the Russian government's alleged collection of such information, not only because of the threat of a potential foreign influence operation, but also to explore the possibility of a misinformation operation targeting the integrity of the U.S. political process.[2]
It has also been suggested that Putin could blackmail Trump:
[O]n October 22, 2016, O'Brien sent an invitation email to the group of expatriate businessmen, including Geovanis, regarding the 2016 holiday dinner in Moscow. In that email, O'Brien wrote, 'I keep thinking that VVP [Putin] must have some great material on Donald.'[2]
A Lawfare summary of the Committee's final report on Russian interference in the 2016 elections examined its "findings regarding reports of 'kompromat' of a sexual nature that may have been collected on Donald Trump during his various visits to Moscow" and found they were "significantly redacted. The blacked-out portions include a fuller description of the threat posed by Russian intelligence services' collection of kompromat."[1]
While the Committee investigated the possibility of Russian kompromat on Trump, much of the discussion was redacted in the public version of the report, and witnesses were less than cooperative; Schiller could "not recall" many events where he was present as Trump's bodyguard. He could not remember ever being at "The Act" nightclub in Las Vegas or anything about the Moscow trip, not even the name of the hotel or whether they stayed there. He was not the only one with "memory issues": "A number of witnesses told the Committee their memories were unclear."[2] Ultimately, the Committee "did not establish" that Russia had kompromat on Trump.[45]
On September 5, 2017, in a Russian state TV broadcast, Russian politician Nikita Isaev (Isayev) confirmed the Kremlin had kompromat on Trump.[183] He was the leader of the far-right New Russia Movement, and he called for retaliation against the Trump administration over its closure of several Russian diplomatic compounds across the U.S.[184] As retaliation, he threatened the release of unspecified kompromat on Trump held by the Russian government. Isaev said: "Let's hit Trump with our Kompromat!" Host: "Do we have it?" Isaev: "Of course we have it!"[183]
Becoming an "asset" and "agent of influence"
[edit]Intelligence agencies may create an asset by compromising the person, and this is done by keeping track of their lies, indiscretions, and potential sexual scandals. Any of these can be used as kompromat to gain leverage over the asset, enabling them to be pressured in many ways:[159]
President Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen says that Trump repeatedly lied during the campaign when he denied have any deals or anything to do with Russia. Others knew as well, presumably — his daughter and son-in-law who worked on the project, Felix Sater who reached out to the Russian and — this is key — the Russians. If you believe Cohen, then Russians knew Trump was lying and Trump knew that they knew. That's leverage. Former FBI official Frank Figliuzzi explains: 'At any time, Vladimir Putin could use — or perhaps he already has used — knowledge of Trump's deceit to pressure Trump on everything from sanctions to public statements to policy on Ukraine.'
Trump's lies about his business projects in Russia created the necessary conditions for Trump to be compromised: "As candidate and again as president, Trump lied about his business ties with Russia."[185] Peter Strzok explains the consequences of those lies:
The moment Trump said publicly, 'I have no business dealings with Russia,' he knew he was lying. Putin knew he was lying, and the FBI had reason to believe he was lying. But American citizens didn't know that. The then-presidential candidate's public denial of his business dealings in Russia signaled to Putin that Trump was more interested in maintaining his personal financial interests than in telling the truth to the American people, and that he needed Putin's complicity to maintain the lie. To use an intelligence term that you will be seeing a lot in this book, in this moment Trump became compromised. Trump's compromising behavior did not begin or end with the lie about his business interests in Russia. The list was long and alarming. ... All these actions made Trump vulnerable to coercion by Russia, and now he was behaving in a way that suggested he was indeed being manipulated by our adversary. The dilemma for us was, what was the Bureau going to do about it?[120]
Former FBI special agent Clint Watts says that "Trump handed Putin 'a window of opportunity should he choose to use it to discredit President Trump at any time President Trump doesn't do what President Putin likes.'"[159] Former acting CIA director John McLaughlin described how the "seeds of blackmail" can come from "ongoing business negotiations" and "the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, even if nothing came of it".[159]
Lawfare described how Trump's lies about the plans to build a Trump Tower in Moscow gave the Russians "leverage" over him and "compromised" him:
This was a lie, and for those quick to dismiss the notion that Donald Trump was to any degree compromised by the Russians, consider the lie for a moment. Trump made these comments publicly in a high-stakes situation. He knew when he did so that they were untrue. The Russians also knew they were untrue. And Trump also knew that the Russians knew that they were untrue. The only people who didn’t know they were untrue were the American public. This creates leverage, because Trump also knew at some level that the Russians could expose his lie in a high-stakes situation at any point. Such knowledge creates counterintelligence risk for the simple reason that it creates a powerful incentive on the part of the candidate not to cross the party with leverage.[1]
Jennifer Rubin, columnist for The Washington Post, wrote:
Senator Adam Schiff "raises the possibility that this is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to President Trump's financial dealings with Russia. If true, and especially if Trump was engaged in money laundering that might violate U.S. laws (something yet to be proven), Schiff says 'Russians would be well aware of it,' and could hold (or be holding) that over Trump's head."[159]
Both of Trump's sons have "admitted that Russians supplied the Trump Organization much of its capital needs", and Trump's former architect, Alan Lapidus, has described how Trump's "involvement with Russia was deeper than he's acknowledged". He helped Trump survey property in Russia in 1997, yet, to his consternation, Trump later "kept protesting that he knew nothing about Russia and hadn't tried to do much business there". Lapidus said: "The quid pro quo has to be in there somewhere. ... Trump could not get money here. He found Russia, and the Russians gave him a lot of money. He has got to be doing a quid pro quo. It's just logical. It's just too much money."[186]
Rubin cites The Moscow Project's description of Trump's relationship with Russia. In the context of heavy investments by Russians in Trump's properties and "a president under several investigations for his connections to the Kremlin":[159]
Russia's outsize role in Trump's reemergence from financial tribulations that nearly destroyed his real estate empire merit additional attention. What emerges is the story of a man indebted to Russia through the oligarchs that President Vladimir Putin helped create and now controls.
Robert Mueller testified that Russia had blackmail on Trump due to financial factors because he lied about negotiating with Russia for a Trump Tower deal in Moscow. He "repeated five times in one press conference, Mr. Mueller, in 2016, 'I have nothing to do with Russia.'" Those repeated false statements[187] made him vulnerable to blackmail:[188][189]
Any undisclosed foreign arrangements would raise red flags about candidates for national office, making them vulnerable to blackmail by others privy to those secrets. Russians call such nuggets of damaging information 'kompromat,' a concept that's become familiar enough to enter the international lexicon.[190]
Right after the dossier was published, the BBC's Paul Wood described four sources for claims of possible Trump–Russia blackmail: "the head of an East European intelligence agency"; "an intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States"; "active duty CIA officers dealing with the case file"; and Christopher Steele ("a former British intelligence agent").[191]
Max Boot has listed "18 reasons Trump could be a Russian asset".[192] He mentioned the dossier when he described more "evidence of Trump's subservience to Putin", and he tied it to new government confirmations of rumors about Trump's alleged indiscretions in Russia:
The Senate Intelligence Committee offered some provocative new nuggets, including suggestions that Trump might have engaged in dalliances with Russian women during visits to Moscow that left him open to blackmail. This is the first confirmation from any branch of the U.S. government that rumors of Russian kompromat on Trump — a central feature of the infamous Steele Dossier — may have some basis in fact.[193]
Tim Weiner wrote that experienced intelligence personnel, such as "veteran American spies, spymasters, and spy-catchers",[31] including Leon Panetta, have described Trump as an "agent of influence",[30] someone who uses his position, power, and influence in the interests of an enemy power:[31]
Leon Panetta, who ran the CIA and the Pentagon under President Obama, has no doubt about it. He told me that, by any definition, 'Trump, for all intents and purposes, acts as an agent of influence of Russia.' ... [Many] veteran American spies, spymasters, and spy-catchers ... concur with Panetta. But they have other theories as well. There's the useful idiot scenario. Or maybe it's money: the Russians might have kompromat—compromising information—about Trump's finances. And some think it might be worse than that.
John R. Schindler says of former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper that "Nobody knows the IC better than Clapper." Then he describes Clapper's description of Putin's influence over Trump as "The most jaw-dropping statement ever uttered about any American president by any serious commentator.":[194]
I think this past weekend is illustrative of what a great case officer Vladimir Putin is. He knows how to handle an asset, and that's what he's doing with the president. ... You have to remember Putin's background. He's a KGB officer. That's what they do. They recruit assets. And I think some of that experience and instincts of Putin has come into play here in his managing of a pretty important account for him, if I could use that term, with our president.
Schindler also described Trump as an "agent of influence":
In particular, Trump's flashy 1987 trip to the Soviet Union – an obvious KGB operation to anyone versed in Chekist matters – led to his becoming an apparent agent of influence for Moscow. That is, a conduit for political favors and information, often in exchange for commercial deals of the sort Trump has always prized. Knowing this, the history of the Trump Organization over the last few decades takes on a different coloration.[194]
Trump viewed as under Putin's influence
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/54/Vladimir_Putin_%26_Donald_Trump_in_Helsinki%2C_16_July_2018_%282%29.jpg/220px-Vladimir_Putin_%26_Donald_Trump_in_Helsinki%2C_16_July_2018_%282%29.jpg)
Many sources, especially from the intelligence community, have stated that Trump acts like a "Russian asset", "agent", "puppet", or "useful idiot" controlled by Putin. While such comments are not limited to describing Trump's actions at the Helsinki summit in 2018, many were triggered by those events.
Trump has often flattered Putin. On June 18, 2013, Trump tweeted: "Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant in November in Moscow - if so, will he become my new best friend?"[141]
Trump's praise of Putin was noticed. The Guardian wrote that in November 2013, in Moscow, Trump "said something he would come to regret":
Asked by an interviewer whether he had a relationship with Russian president Vladimir Putin, the brash New York businessman could not resist boasting. 'I do have a relationship with him,' Trump said. Russia's strongman had 'done a very brilliant job', Trump told MSNBC's Thomas Roberts, before declaring that Putin had bested Barack Obama. 'He's done an amazing job – he's put himself really at the forefront of the world as a leader in a short period of time.' ... On at least three occasions following the Miss Universe trip, Trump had publicly claimed to have met Putin. But when asked by reporters at a campaign stop in Florida in July 2016 to clarify the status of his relationship with the Russian president, as concerns over Russian election interference mounted, Trump gave a rather different version. 'I never met Putin,' said Trump. 'I don't know who Putin is.'[42]
2018 Helsinki summit
[edit]Several leaders and lawyers in the U.S. intelligence community reacted strongly to Trump's performance at the summit. They described it as "subservien[ce] to Putin" and a "fervent defense of Russia's military and cyber aggression around the world, and its violation of international law in Ukraine" which they saw as "harmful to US interests". They also suggested he was either a "Russian asset" or a "useful idiot" for Putin,[28] and that he looked like "Putin's puppet".[195]
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper saw Trump's behavior and wondered "if Russians have something on Trump".[29]
Former CIA director John Brennan, who has accused Trump of "treason", tweeted: "He is wholly in the pocket of Putin."[196]
At the joint press conference, when asked directly about the subject, Putin denied having any kompromat on Trump. Even though Trump was given a "gift from Putin" the weekend of the pageant, Putin asserted "that he did not even know Trump was in Russia for the Miss Universe pageant in 2013 when, according to the Steele dossier, video of Trump was secretly recorded to blackmail him."[197]
After Putin was asked "about the purported existence of a certain racy video clip in his country's possession", Jay Willis noted Putin's strange answer; he could have cleared Trump but did not do so: "He's not saying it exists. But he's also not saying it doesn't exist. ... What this answer does not include: any straightforward denial that the pee tape exists."[198]
In reaction to Trump's behavior at the summit, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) spoke in the Senate: "Millions of Americans will continue to wonder if the only possible explanation for this dangerous and inexplicable behavior is the possibility—the very real possibility—that President Putin holds damaging information over President Trump."[199]
Natasha Bertrand described how Trump's actions at the Helsinki summit:
led many to conclude that Steele's report was more accurate than not. ... Trump sided with the Russians over the U.S. intelligence community's assessment that Moscow had waged an all-out attack on the 2016 election. ... The joint news conference ... cemented fears among some that Trump was in Putin's pocket and prompted bipartisan backlash."[200]
Other comments
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5d/John_Brennan_2018.jpg/220px-John_Brennan_2018.jpg)
"[John] Brennan stressed repeatedly
that collusion may have been unwitting,
at least at first as Russian intelligence
was deft at disguising its approaches
to would-be agents. 'Frequently, individuals
on a treasonous path do not even realize
they're on that path until it gets to be too late.'"[201]
Former CIA director Michael V. Hayden said Trump was a "polezni durak" - a "useful fool" who is "manipulated by Moscow".[192][27]
During the final presidential debate, Hillary Clinton said Putin "would rather have a puppet as president of the United States".[27]
Paul Wood, referring to descriptions of Trump by Hillary Clinton and Michael Morell, wrote that both "agent" and "puppet" "imply some measure of influence or control by Moscow".[27]
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi questioned Trump's loyalty to America when she asked him: "[Why do] all roads lead to Putin?"[202]
Former acting CIA director Michael Morell has written: "In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation."[27][203]
John Sipher, a former member of the CIA's Senior Intelligence Service, considers Trump a Russian agent in a limited sense. He starts by saying Trump is not an agent in the traditional sense, and later says he is "an agent of a foreign power":
I think it is entirely plausible that Mr. Trump is somehow compromised by his personal and financial dealings with Russia and Russians, but I do not think he is an 'agent' in the sense that intelligence professionals use the term. Let me explain. ... Based on the U.S. definition of an agent, it is unlikely that President Trump is a recruited and controlled source of the Russian intelligence services. To a professional he is a nightmare. Yes, he is a cauldron of potentially exploitable vulnerabilities. ... He clearly crossed a line and can be objectively labeled an agent of a foreign power in the standard definition of the word. From the Russian perspective, it is a win-win even if the relationship doesn't meet the cloak-and-dagger definition of a wholly clandestine espionage agent.[204]
Peter Strzok has analyzed Trump's life, leading him to believe Trump was and is "compromised" and thus, wittingly or unwittingly, indebted to Putin.[120] Strzok describes the many things Trump did and said before and during his presidency that made him vulnerable to blackmail and pressure from foreign adversaries. Strzok posits the question: "When a president appears to favor personal and Russian interests over those of our nation, has he become a national security threat?"[3]
Ynet, an Israeli online news site, reported on January 12, 2017, that U.S. intelligence advised Israeli intelligence officers to be cautious about sharing information with the incoming Trump administration until the possibility of Russian influence over Trump, suggested by Steele's report, has been fully investigated.[205]
Adam Davidson, a staff writer at The New Yorker, has described "sistema", the system of kompromat and constant fear that affects the actions of people from Russia and other nations in that part of the world, even when they work in the United States. Anyone who works with them is endangered. Everyone collects kompromat on everyone, even their friends and business partners, so everyone exists with the threat of even small missteps being used against them, so they try not to antagonize others. Trump is endangered because he has worked with "many ethnic Turks from Central Asia, such as the Mammadov family, in Azerbaijan; Tevfik Arif, in New York; and Aras and Emin Agalarov, in Moscow [and] large numbers of émigrés from the former Soviet Union."[35]
Davidson writes:
If there truly is damaging kompromat on Trump, it could well be in the hands of Trump's business partners, or even in those of their rivals. ... [They save it] knowing that it might one day provide some sort of business leverage—even with no thought that he could someday become the most powerful person on Earth. ... Had he never sought the Presidency, he may never have had to come to terms with these decisions. But now he is much like everyone else in sistema. He fears there is kompromat out there—maybe a lot of it—but he doesn't know precisely what it is, who has it, or what might set them off.[35]
Political scientist Keith Darden said that Trump has "never said a bad word about Putin. ... He's exercised a degree of self-control with respect to Russia that he doesn't with anything else." Darden said: "He is capable of being strategic. He knows there are limits, there are bounds on what he can say and do with respect to Russia."[35]
Richard Dearlove, "The former head of the United Kingdom’s spy agency said a potential second term for former President Trump is a national security threat to his country."[32]
History of rumor awareness
[edit]True or not, the rumor became known to at least five groups of people at different time periods. Awareness started among Russians, Cohen, Trump, and a few others around him, but it was unknown to the American public until publication of the Steele dossier in 2017.
In late 2013, shortly after Trump left the 2013 Miss Universe pageant, Muscovites began to hear about compromising tapes of Trump with prostitutes in the Ritz-Carlton hotel, with "tales of [Trump's] weird sexual indiscretions" being described as an "open secret"[14] and "a well-known story" in Moscow,[206] and Moscow prostitutes saying "the 'golden shower' orgy story is true".[13]
The second group were individuals who tried to help Cohen find out if the tapes were real, locate them, and stop them. Cohen was willing to pay a lot for the tapes.[4]
Awareness outside of Russia was limited to a third group, mostly with connections to Cohen and Trump. Cohen testified that "many people"[a] were aware of the rumor, and he mentioned "half a dozen people" who knew and reached out to him.[4] At least twenty named, and many unnamed, people were aware of the "Moscow tape"[60] long before Steele even started his research.
The fourth group's knowledge was related to Steele. In June 2016, after Steele began to receive reports back from his Russian sources, he began to privately share some details with a few journalists,[40][207][208] the FBI Crossfire Hurricane team, and its leaders. Before the election, only two news sources mentioned some allegations that came from dossier reports, but neither mentioned the pee tape rumor. Steele had been in contact with both authors. These were a September 23, 2016, Yahoo! News article by Michael Isikoff that focused on Carter Page,[207] and an article by David Corn on October 31, 2016, a week before the election, in Mother Jones magazine.[208]
The public were the fifth group. They learned of the rumor when the dossier was published on January 10, 2017. Because the dossier's description was the first public description, people were under the mistaken impression Steele invented a new rumor.[128][129] Cohen's testimony to the House Intelligence Committee on March 6, 2019, made clear that Steele's Russian sources were not inventing a rumor; rather, they were sharing the old rumor from 2013, and Trump and Cohen had known about it the whole time.[4]
Awareness of allegations that predate the Steele dossier and 2016 campaign
[edit]The Senate Intelligence Committee dug into early awareness, writing about "Separate but related allegations, which were not public, in some cases predated both Steele's memos and the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign":
Russia has a longstanding practice of collecting compromising information to attempt to influence or coerce prominent individuals, posing a potential counterintelligence threat. Allegations that the Russian government had compromising information on then-candidate Trump emerged in 2016, and were more fully made public in early 2017, through memos produced by Christopher Steele. Separate but related allegations, which were not public, in some cases predated both Steele's memos and the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. Collectively, the allegations raised a potential counterintelligence concern, that Russia might use compromising information to influence the then-presidential candidate's positions on relations with Russia. The Committee sought, in a limited way, to understand the Russian government's alleged collection of such information, not only because of the threat of a potential foreign influence operation, but also to explore the possibility of a misinformation operation targeting the integrity of the U.S. political process. (p. 636)[2]
They also noted that Trump knew about the "alleged compromising tapes of him in Moscow", allegations that "are separate from" the later Steele dossier:
The Committee's Report also shows that prior to and during the campaign, Trump was informed of alleged compromising tapes of him in Moscow. These allegations are separate from Christopher Steele's reports, which were not used to support the Committee's work. The Committee found that the Russian intelligence services clearly engage in the collection of compromising information for leverage, and that there may be substance to some of the allegations regarding Trump, which leaves open an ongoing concern about Russian influence operations. (p. 945)[2]
Awareness timeline table
[edit]Below are listed people who are known to have been aware of the rumor. Some are named and others are mentioned because sources allude to them. The list is roughly in the chronological order of when they were made aware. Some involved in the hunt for the tape(s) were made aware more than once.
Date | Name | Notes | Cite |
---|---|---|---|
Nov. 8, 2013 | Someone offered to send five prostitutes "to Trump's hotel room that night" | If that person carried through with that offer, they would have known of the incident. Schiller's claim that he denied the offer has been questioned, so the possibility exists that the offer was accepted. The lobby and elevator incidents lend support to the possibility that Trump was visited by hookers. | [41] |
Nov. 9, 2013 | Those allegedly involved in the incident | Trump, the prostitutes, their provider, Steele's Source D, those who cleaned the room, and the FSB. | [6] |
Nov. 9, 2013 | Aras Agalarov / Crocus Group | Both the dossier and Rtskhiladze, independently of each other, implicated Agalarov and his Crocus Group with responsibility, knowledge, and/or possession of compromising tapes of Trump. Rtskhiladze "assessed that if compromising material existed, Crocus Group [the Agalarovs] would likely be responsible". | [e] |
Nov. 9-10, 2013 | Some of Steele's seven Russian sources | Some allegedly knew at the time, including sources D and E, "several of the staff were aware of it at the time and subsequently ... a company ethnic Russian operative to Source F, a female staffer at the hotel when TRUMP had stayed there, who also confirmed the story." They later provided the information reported to Steele. | [6][49] |
Unknown | Moscow prostitutes | Stanislav Belkovsky said that "Prostitutes around the city say the 'golden shower' orgy story is true." | [13] |
Late 2013 | Michael Cohen | Cohen testified he became aware in "late 2013 or early 2014, shortly after the Miss Universe 2013 pageant and significantly prior to the 2016 U.S. election cycle". | [4] |
Late 2013 | Donald Trump (again) | Michael Cohen informed him shortly after the Miss Universe 2013 pageant. | [4] |
2014 or 2015 | Giorgi Rtskhiladze | Cohen tells him about the rumor and asks him to find out if the tapes are real. | [2] |
Unknown | Six different people | "Cohen estimated that, over the course of several years, six different people contacted him regarding the alleged tape." He named three of them (below). | [2] |
Unknown | David Pecker | "[T]hose individuals included David Pecker, Dylan Howard and Harvey Levin." | [2] |
Unknown | Dylan Howard | "[T]hose individuals included David Pecker, Dylan Howard and Harvey Levin." | [2] |
Unknown | Harvey Levin | "[T]hose individuals included David Pecker, Dylan Howard and Harvey Levin." | [2] |
Oct. 2015 | Sergei Khokhlov | He overheard at least two people discussing tapes of Trump, so he contacted his friend Rtskhiladze. | [1] |
Oct. 2015 | Others discussing tapes of Trump | At least two people were overheard by Khokhlov. | [1] |
Oct. 2015 | Giorgi Rtskhiladze (again) | Khokhlov tells Rtskhiladze, but Rtskhiladze waited a year before telling Cohen on October 30, 2016. | [1] |
Apr.-June 2016 | Some of Steele's seven Russian sources | Steele received the "hotel anecdote" from seven Russian sources. Danchenko was not his only source for this information. | [49] |
June 2016 | Igor Danchenko | Danchenko traveled to Moscow in early June 2016. There he was told about "'a well-known story' regarding Trump's alleged salacious sexual activity at the hotel". When he "asked the Ritz-Carlton staff about them ... [they] did not deny the veracity of those rumors." | [39][206] |
June 2016 | Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS staff | After Steele began writing the dossier, his team became aware of the rumor. | [49][209][210] |
July 30, 2016 | Bruce Ohr | Steele told him about the rumor and that Russian intel believed they had Trump "over a barrel". | [40][33][176] |
July-Oct. 2016 | Journalists Paul Wood, Michael Isikoff, and David Corn | Steele began to privately share some information but not copies of his memos. | [40][207][208][211] |
Sep. 19, 2016 | FBI Crossfire Hurricane team, and probably FBI and CIA leadership. | This was the first time they and their leader, Peter Strzok, had received any of Steele's reporting. | [212][211] |
Sep. 19, 2016 | James Comey | Comey probably learned some at the same time as the Crossfire Hurricane team. | [213][214] |
Before Oct. 7, 2016 | Katrina Pierson | She knew before October 7, 2016. | [136] |
Oct. 8, 2016 | Hope Hicks | Katrina Pierson tells Hope Hicks of the pee tape. Hicks reached out to Cohen and asked him to track down the tape. | [136] |
Oct. 30, 2016 | Michael Cohen (again) | Rtskhiladze waited a year before telling Cohen on October 30, 2016, about his October 2015 conversation with Khokhlov. See #ERRATA | [2] |
Oct. 30, 2016 | Donald Trump (again) | Cohen tells him and "several others" (including Donald Trump Jr. and Schiller) about message from Rtskhiladze. | [2] |
Oct. 30, 2016 | Donald Trump Jr. | Cohen tells him about October 30, 2016, message from Rtskhiladze. | [2] |
Oct. 30, 2016 | Keith Schiller | Cohen tells him about October 30, 2016, message from Rtskhiladze. | [2] |
Unknown | Intelligence sources and agencies (multiple) | Unknown how much they knew and when, but presumably more than most others. They (still) keep information redacted in published reports (Mueller report, Senate Intelligence Committee, etc.) to protect their methods and sources. | [27] |
Unknown | Sir Andrew Wood | The former British ambassador to Moscow had learned of the dossier and vouched for Steele's professionalism to John McCain. | [213][215] |
Early Dec. 2016 | John McCain and his aide David J. Kramer | Steele gave Kramer a copy of all 16 reports, that Kramer then gave to McCain. | [209][216] |
Dec. 9, 2016 | James Comey (again) | McCain gave Comey a copy of the dossier. Comey had probably seen some with the Crossfire team after September 19, 2016. | [213][214] |
Before Jan. 5, 2017 | Barack Obama, Condoleezza Rice, attendees | A few days before January 5, 2017, during the President's Daily Briefing, James Clapper informed Obama of the "golden showers" allegation. Other attendees also heard the message. | [217] |
Jan. 5, 2017 | Barack Obama and Joe Biden | The four intelligence chiefs (John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, and Michael S. Rogers) informed Obama and Biden of the dossier and its salacious allegations. | [218][219] |
Jan. 6, 2017 | Gang of Eight | Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and Rogers inform the bipartisan Gang of Eight of the 115th United States Congress: Richard Burr, Kevin McCarthy, Mitch McConnell, Devin Nunes, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, and Mark Warner | [217] |
Jan. 6, 2017 | Donald Trump learns of dossier | The four intelligence chiefs go to Trump Tower. Comey then privately briefed Trump about "the sensitive material in the Steele reporting". Trump then dissembled by not revealing he had known of this rumor since 2013. Trump later testified in London this was the first time he was "made aware" of the dossier (not the rumor).[s] | [220][221] |
Jan. 10, 2017 | Public learns of "pee tape" | Everyone learns after the dossier was published, without Steele's permission, by BuzzFeed News. | [6] |
Jan. 10, 2017 | Hillary Clinton | Clinton first learned of the dossier after BuzzFeed posted it. | [222][223] |
Jan. 10, 2017 | Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Brian Fallon | They first learned of the dossier after BuzzFeed posted it. | [222][223] |
Jan. 10, 2017 | Members of Congress | "This was the first time that most members of Congress had heard of it." | [120] |
Michael Cohen and Giorgi Rtskhiladze
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/Michael_Cohen_headshot.jpg/170px-Michael_Cohen_headshot.jpg)
Although Cohen did not accompany Trump to Moscow in 2013, his actions in relation to the pee tape rumor became important elements in the awareness history of what Cohen described as "the infamous pee tape when Mr. Trump was in Moscow for the Miss Universe Pageant":[4]
Michael Cohen has testified that he became aware of allegations about a tape of compromising information in late 2013 or early 2014, shortly after the Miss Universe 2013 pageant and significantly prior to the 2016 U.S. election cycle. The alleged tape related to Trump and prostitutes. Cohen has testified that he discussed the allegations with Trump, who asked Cohen to find out where the allegations were coming from. Trump told Cohen that the allegations were not true.
Cohen's later testimony revealed that "he had been aware of other similar allegations that began shortly after Trump's travel to Moscow in 2013", and many others[a] have also known about the rumor since that time. Cohen acted on Trump's request, and, in "2014 or 2015", he contacted his friend Giorgi Rtskhiladze, "to see if Rtskhiladze could find out if the tape was real".[2]
Rtskhiladze is a Georgian-American businessman who was born in the Republic of Georgia[98] and is now a U.S. citizen (since 2017).[224] He partnered with The Trump Organization, and thus Cohen, in its failed building project plans in the former Soviet Union, including plans for a Trump Tower Moscow development in 2015. Most significant coverage of him is in connection with Cohen and Trump. In January 2017, Cohen gave him a ticket to Trump's inaugural ball, which he attended.[2]
Trump met Rtskhiladze many times:
Over the course of their relationship, Cohen recalled introducing Rtskhiladze to Trump on multiple occasions, both in Trump's office in New York and in Georgia during Trump's trip there in connection with the Batumi deal. 2919 Cohen stated that he and Rtskhiladze were friends and that he spoke to, and spent time with, Rtskhiladze on a "regular basis."[2]
In October 2015, Sergei Khokhlov, a Russian friend of Rtskhiladze, told Rtskhiladze he overheard two people "discussing sensitive tapes of a Trump visit to Russia". A year later, the Access Hollywood tape became headlines on October 7, 2016. Because of its possibly damaging effects on Trump's reputation and business possibilities in the former Soviet Union,[1] on October 30, 2016, "Rtskhiladze informed Cohen of the alleged tapes in Moscow, and Cohen informed Trump and several others", including Donald Trump Jr. and Schiller. "Cohen has said that there was no additional action taken, and that he had been aware of other similar allegations that began shortly after Trump's travel to Moscow in 2013, none of which Cohen was able to corroborate."[2]
ERRATA
[edit]Two matters:
- 2015 or 2016? (Either the Senate report or a later court record got it wrong.)
- Baker source is problematic as it uncritically takes sides
There is a confusion of dates given by Rtskhiladze in various sources. I need to figure this out. There are at least two possible explanations for the error:
- A transcription error. Both are in October, so someone may have accidentally written 2015 or 2016.
- This could be one of Rtskhiladze's changing stories (Judge Cooper mentions them). Here's an example mentioned by the Committee (p. 659):
- A detail of Rtskhiladze's characterization of this event shifted over time. Rtskhiladze's original written response to the Committee, through counsel, stated that Khokhlov "overheard someone at a party bragging about alleged tapes of Mr. Trump." An earlier letter from Rtskhiladze's counsel to the Attorney General also characterized the event as a "party." In a second written submission to the Committee, Rtskhiladze through counsel included a clarification: "The comment about the tapes was not overheard by Mr. Khokhlov at 'a party' per se, but specifically was overheard at a restaurant from an individual at a nearby table."
Phone call between Rtskhiladze and Khokhlov:
- Senate report says October 2015
- A court record says October 2016 (THAT is a problem!)
Later texts between Cohen and Rtskhiladze:
- Mueller report Footnote 112 says October 30, 2016
- Senate report says the same.
Based on the Senate Intelligence Committee report, I have written above:
- "Rtskhiladze waited a year before telling Cohen on October 30, 2016, about his October 2015 conversation with Khokhlov."[2]
That harmonizes with the Senate report (p. 639): (BOLD added)
- {U) The second set of allegations relate to a Moscow-based businessman, Sergey
Khokhlov, who overheard two people in Moscow, in October 2015, discussing sensitive tapes of a Trump visit to Russia. He relayed what he heard to Giorgi Rtskhiladze, a friend and business associate of Michael Cohen. In October 2016, Rtskhiladze informed Cohen of the alleged tapes in Moscow, and Cohen informed Trump and several others. Cohen has said that there was no additional action taken, and that he had been aware of other similar allegations that began shortly after Trump's travel to Moscow in 2013, none of which Cohen was able to corroborate. (p. 639)
I have also written:
- "Footnote 112" in Volume 2 of the Mueller Report mentions these communications between Rtskhiladze and Cohen, and the House Intelligence Committee provided the whole exchange in "Exhibit 38", reproduced below.[4]
I have also written above:
- In October 2015, Sergei Khokhlov, a Russian friend of Rtskhiladze, told Rtskhiladze he overheard two people "discussing sensitive tapes of a Trump visit to Russia". A year later, the Access Hollywood tape became headlines on October 7, 2016. Because of its possibly damaging effects on Trump's reputation and business possibilities in the former Soviet Union,[1] on October 30, 2016, "Rtskhiladze informed Cohen of the alleged tapes in Moscow,...
I'll dump source material here and then later figure this out. It needs to be parsed accurately.
In a court report, that conversation is given as "late October 2016", just before Rtskhiladze reported the conversation to Cohen on October 30, 2016, (mentioned in "Footnote 112") and they exchanged the messages in "Exhibit 38".[4]
In late October 2016, plaintiff received a telephone call at his home in Connecticut
from a longtime friend. During that conversation, the friend told plaintiff that he had recently attended a dinner party in Moscow at which he overheard a person at the next table—whom he did not know—bragging about some tapes related to a trip by Mr. Trump to Moscow. The friend said he was passing along the information because he knew plaintiff had an ongoing business relationship with the Trump Organization about building a Trump Tower in Georgia. This telephone conversation was the sole basis for an exchange of texts between plaintiff and Mr. Cohen on October 30, 2016
Source: https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2020/06/18/Muellerlawsuit.pdf
So is it October 2015 (below) or "late October 2016" (above)?
Of interest below:
- October 2015
- kompromat on Trump” that were “[s]eparate from Steele’s memos.” Id. at 638.
The following is a REALLY GOOD SUMMARY:
From: Rtskhiladze v. Mueller, Opinion, 20-cv-1591[16] This lawsuit accurately quotes the Senate report and date of October 2015:
The Senate Report first identifies Rtskhiladze’s contacts with Cohen as part of “three
general sets of allegations” regarding “Russian government collected kompromat on Trump” that were “[s]eparate from Steele’s memos.” Id. at 638. Discussing those allegations, the report indicates that “Cohen has testified that he became aware of allegations about a tape of compromising information in late 2013 or early 2014 . . . related to Trump and prostitutes.” Id. at 658. As a result, Cohen “asked a friend, Giorgi Rtskhiladze, to see if Rtskhiladze could find out if the tape was real.” Id. It adds that “Cohen . . . would have been willing to pay . . . to suppress the information if it could be verified.” Id. The Senate Report then summarizes a response offered by Rtskhiladze to the Select Committee in 2019:
During an October 2015 phone call that Mr. Rtskhiladze had with his friend and former business associate, Sergei Khokhlov, Mr. Khokhlov stated that while having dinner at a restaurant, Mr. Khokhlov overheard a stranger at a table next to him discuss tapes from Donald Trump’s visit to Russia. The overheard dinner conversation was not important to Mr. Rtskhiladze and Mr. Khokhlov so they did not discuss this matter again. Mr. Khokhlov was aware that Mr. Rtskhiladze and his Georgian partners were in business with the Trump Organization. Due to the news about the Access Hollywood tapes and its potential impact on Mr. Trump’s reputation, Mr. Rtskhiladze sent a text message to Mr. Cohen to inform him that an individual was overheard discussing sensitive tapes of Mr. Trump’s trip to Russia. Id. at 659. The Senate Report proceeds to quote the full exchange of texts between Rtskhiladze and
Cohen from October 2016,
Source: [16]
Below says October 2016, "dinner party the night before" and "the next day" Rtskhiladze contacted Cohen (which was October 30, 2016): (BOLD added)
1. Rtskhiladze’s correspondance with Cohen regarding certain “tapes” from
Russia
In October 2016, Rtskhiladze received a telephone call from an unnamed friend. The
friend apparently had attended a dinner party the night before where he overheard someone
“bragging about some tapes related to a trip by Mr. Trump to Moscow.” Id. at ¶ 21. The friend
knew that Rtskhiladze had worked with the Trump Organization and decided to pass along the
gossip. Id. The next day, Rtskhiladze texted Cohen that he had “[s]topped flow of some tapes
from Russia.” Id. at ¶ 31. He indicated that he was “not sure if there’s anything else[,]” but was
reaching out “[j]ust so u know . . . .” Id. Cohen asked, “[t]apes of what?”
If that is accurate, Rtskhiladze was able to IMMEDIATELY "stop" the tapes!
There is also a source I use that needs to be abandoned in favor of another source. It uncritically takes sides:
- [225]
- Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20200711194204/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-17/mueller-accused-of-defaming-man-in-special-counsel-report
Stopped "flow of some tapes"
[edit]When Rtskhiladze contacted Cohen, he indicated he had acted on the information from Khokhlov (from 2015) and stopped "flow of some tapes from Russia". Cohen then asked him "Tapes of what?" and Rtskhiladze replied "Not sure of the content but person in Moscow was bragging had tapes from Russia trip."[4] Their communication continued, and Lawfare observed that the goal of these communications about the tapes "was to run them down and keep them quiet so that Trump could 'make it to' the White House".[1] This happened about a week before the 2016 election and well before the Steele dossier became public knowledge on January 10, 2017.[19]
CNN noted that this episode "occurred months before top intelligence officials, including former FBI Director James Comey, presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him that were contained in a dossier prepared by retired British spy Christopher Steele, which CNN has reported took place in January 2017."[226]
"Footnote 112" in Volume 2 of the Mueller Report mentions these communications between Rtskhiladze and Cohen, and the House Intelligence Committee provided the whole exchange in "Exhibit 38", reproduced below.[4]
From | To | Body | Timestamp: Date | Timestamp: Time |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rtskhiladze | Cohen | Stopped "flow of some tapes from Russia but not sure if there's anything else. Just so u know. ... | 10/30/2016 | 7:30:22 PM(UTC+0) |
Cohen | Rtskhiladze | Tapes of what? | 10/30/2016 | 7:48:51 PM(UTC+0) |
Rtskhiladze | Cohen | Not sure of the content but person in Moscow was bragging had tapes from Russia trip. | 10/30/2016 | 7:52:12 PM(UTC+0) |
Rtskhiladze | Cohen | Will try to dial you tomorrow but wanted to be aware | 10/30/2016 | 7:52:41 PM(UTC+0) |
Rtskhiladze | Cohen | I'm sure it's not a big deal but there are lots of stupid people | 10/30/2016 | 7:53:25 PM(UTC+0) |
Cohen | Rtskhiladze | You have no idea | 10/30/2016 | 7:53:46 PM(UTC+0) |
Rtskhiladze | Cohen | I do trust me. | 10/30/2016 | 7'.54:27 PM(UTC+0) |
Rtskhiladze | Cohen | He needs to make it to the WH Mike! | 10/30/2016 | 7:57:4O PM(UTC+0) |
Rtskhiladze | Cohen | Mike-Keeping fingers crossed I predicted Mr. Trump! | 11/9/2016 | 2:41:42 AM(UTC+0) |
Rtskhiladze | Cohen | Fantastic journey from Batumi to the WH! You and I need to do huge deals! | 11/9/2016 | 7:23:19 AM(UTC+0) |
Lawsuit Rtskhiladze v. Mueller
[edit]CASE: Rtskhiladze v. Mueller, Complaint, Case 1:20-cv-01591-CRC.
FILED: June 17, 2020.[227]
Georgi Rtskhiladze, a Georgian-American businessman, was unhappy with the way he was portrayed in "Footnote 112" in the Mueller Report, and in 2020 he unsuccessfully sued Robert Mueller and the Department of Justice for defamation over the matter.[227] Rtskhiladze sought at least $100 million in damages and a retraction from the Mueller report. He asserted he suffered "massive financial and emotional harm" because the Mueller Report allegedly connected him with the pee tape and Crocus Group. According to the suit: "Steele was concerned the Russians could use the recordings to blackmail Trump. Mueller’s report mentioned unverified allegations that a Russian real estate conglomerate, Crocus Group, was in possession of the compromising tapes and insinuated that Rtskhiladze worked with Crocus to prevent its release."[225]
Rtskhiladze's claim that it was Mueller who "insinuated that Rtskhiladze worked with Crocus to prevent its release" is dubious. In fact, it was Rtskhiladze, not Mueller, who pointed at Agalarov's Crocus Group when he described to Mueller's investigators that the "tapes" mentioned on October 30, 2016, "referred to compromising tapes of Trump rumored to be held by persons associated with the Russian real estate conglomerate Crocus Group".[15][19]
POSSIBLY DUBIOUS CONTENT ABOVE and BELOW, using Baker_Dolmetsch_6/17/2020 source
- insinuated that Rtskhiladze worked with Crocus to prevent its release."[225]
Mueller did not make that INSINUATION, but did the lawsuit accuse him of doing so?
In his 2020 lawsuit against Robert Mueller,[227] Rtskhiladze, unprompted, suggested a way he could have "stopped flow of some tapes from Russia". He also mentioned someone he knew who might have been in a position to help him do that. This happened when he accused Mueller of "insinuating" how he did it, and which his lawsuit against Mueller denied. Rtskhiladze asserted that "Mueller's report mentioned unverified allegations that a Russian real estate conglomerate, Crocus Group, was in possession of the compromising tapes and insinuated that Rtskhiladze worked with Crocus to prevent its release."[225] In fact, it was Rtskhiladze, not Mueller, who pointed at Agalarov's Crocus Group when he described to Michael Cohen on October 30, 2016, how "compromising tapes of Trump" were "rumored to be held by persons associated with the Russian real estate conglomerate Crocus Group",[15] and Mueller had not "insinuated" that "Rtskhiladze worked with Crocus" to stop the tapes. Those were Rtskhiladze's words.
Both the dossier and Rtskhiladze, independently of each other, implicated Agalarov and his Crocus Group with responsibility, knowledge, and/or possession of compromising tapes of Trump. Rtskhiladze said that "compromising tapes of Trump" were "rumored to be held by persons associated with the Russian real estate conglomerate Crocus Group" [owned by Agalarov].[15] He also "assessed that if compromising material existed, Crocus Group would likely be responsible".[e] Steele's dossier independently implicated Agalarov with knowledge of Trump's alleged salacious activities when it asserted that Agalarov "would know most of the details of what the Republican presidential candidate had got up to" in St. Petersburg.[7][135]
RESPONSIBLE
"Though Rtskhiladze did not have personal insight into the matter, he assessed that if compromising material existed, Crocus Group would likely be responsible." (p. 660)[2]
Judge Cooper's analysis of Rtskhiladze's claims
[edit]The case was dismissed for lack of standing by District Judge Christopher R. Cooper on September 1, 2021. Cooper's dismissal argumentation included an extensive analysis of Rtskhiladze's activities and beliefs about the tapes he stopped. The lawsuit brought to light some interesting facts about the hunt for the pee tape, how it likely was stopped, and Judge Cooper connected many dots before he dismissed the case.[227] Judge Cooper quoted various parts of the Senate Report that demonstrated how, the "day after the Steele Dossier allegations were published in 2017" by BuzzFeed, Rtskhiladze wrote an email showing he recognized that the description of the alleged pee tape in the dossier just released by BuzzFeed also described the tapes he stopped in October 2016.[15]
Rtskhiladze said that he, at the time he spoke to Cohen on October 30, 2016, did not know of the dossier and therefore could not have known the tapes he stopped were actually the dossier's pee tape(s). He argued: "The public—including plaintiff—did not become aware of the Steele Dossier until several months after the election." He also said that if he "had knowledge that the subject of the tapes was the salacious tapes mentioned in the unverified Steele Dossier, he would not have told Mr. Cohen that he was '[n]ot sure of the content'."[227] Judge Cooper placed that claim in context by writing:
The Senate Report makes clear that Rtskhiladze did, in fact, suspect that the rumored Steele Dossier tapes were the same tapes discussed in his October 2016 text conversation with Cohen. ... Rtskhiladze protests that "it is beyond credulity to suggest-as Footnote 112 does-that [he] was referring to the tapes mentioned in the Steele Dossier" in his texts with Cohen. FAC at ¶ 37. But the Senate Report demonstrates that Rtskhiladze himself suggested that very thing, in writing, just the day after the Steele Dossier was made public. Senate Report at 660. Rtskhiladze's own words as reproduced in the Senate Report show that he, at the very least, suspected in 2017 that the tapes referred to in his texts with Cohen and the tapes mentioned in the Steele Dossier were one and the same.[16]
Judge Cooper cast doubt on Rtskhiladze's strange claim the tapes were "fake". He said Rtskhiladze "undercut" his claim by speaking as if getting recorded was a real consequence of indiscretions committed around Agalarov/Crocus: "As for Rtskhiladze's professed belief that the tapes were fake, that suggestion is somewhat undercut by Rtskhiladze's statement, only present in the Senate Report, suggesting that the tapes may have been real, and that they were 'what happens when you visit crocus I guess.'"[16]
Agalarov's history with Trump provides important context for the mentions of Agalarov and his Crocus Group by Rtskhiladze. Agalarov and other Russians were with Trump when he visited "The Act" nightclub in Las Vegas, and they observed Trump watching a golden showers performance "with delight".[10] Agalarov/Crocus had also hosted and paid for the Miss Universe contest and reserved the Presidential Suite at the Ritz-Carlton hotel, which was rated a "high counterintelligence risk environment", with Russian agents on staff, surveillance of rooms, and many prostitutes.[2]
Two "former employees did not know whether there were cameras permanently in certain rooms, but both believed it was possible, and there was awareness of recording devices being prearranged in rooms in anticipation of the arrival of particular guests."[1] Rtskhiladze knew that, as Agalarov was a close associate of Putin, anything improper was likely to be recorded: "[Rtskhiladze] had 'told [Cohen] there was something there b 4 election,' adding, 'well that's what happens when you visit crocus I guess.'" Rtskhiladze was the one who "assessed that if compromising material existed, Crocus Group [the Agalarovs] would likely be responsible".[e] Judge Cooper also noted that "Rtskhiladze ... [has] contacts connected to the Kremlin, particularly the office of Dimitri Peskov,.. key advisor to [Russian President Vladimir] Putin. ... Rtskhiladze told Cohen that Peskov was his 'good friend.'"[16]
Judge Cooper also connected seven dots about the tape before dismissing the case. He showed how (1) Cohen's request in "2014 or 2015" that Rtskhiladze "find out if the tape was real", which was inspired by (2) Cohen's knowledge of the pee tape since "shortly after the Miss Universe 2013 pageant", led to (3) Rtskhiladze acting on a 2015 report from Khokhlov and stopping the flow of some compromising tapes from Russia in October 2016. Those tapes were (4) mentioned in "Footnote 112" and connected by Mueller with (5) the dossier's pee tape from 2013. Judge Cooper also showed the tapes were (6) associated with Crocus Group and were (7) suspected by Rtskhiladze to be "one and the same" tape.[16]
Judge Cooper does not believe Rtskhiladze's changing story
[edit]Mueller's office "twice interviewed Rtskhiladze",[19] and his story changed between interviews. "Footnote 112" covers both interviews. In the April 2018 interview, when asked what he meant by "tapes" in his claim to have "stopped flow of some tapes", he stated that "'tapes' referred to compromising tapes of Trump rumored to be held by persons associated with the Russian real estate conglomerate Crocus Group, which had helped host the 2013 Miss Universe Pageant in Russia."[19][15] "Footnote 112" "concluded with additional information from a May 2018 interview".[100] His previous story in April changed with the additional claim made in May "that Khokhlov subsequently called and stated that the tapes were fake, but Rtskhiladze said this information was not conveyed to Cohen."[15][19] (Judge Cooper cast doubt upon the claim of a call from Khokhlov.) The Senate report also notes the lack of evidence for that claim in the partially blacked-out "Footnote 4281" that says "did not identify evidence of a later call from Khokhlov".[2]
Because Rtskhiladze, per Cohen's request to "find out if the tape was real", had been watching out for the tapes, his initial message to Cohen on October 30, 2016, (that he had "stopped flow of some tapes") not only implied the tapes were real, not fake, but also that he had found and stopped the tapes at their source (implications later confirmed by Judge Cooper[16]). It was only much later, in his May 2018 interview, that Rtskhiladze claimed "he was [later] told the tapes were fake", a claim doubted by Judge Cooper.
If Rtskhiladze really had received such a "fake tapes" call by Khokhlov, he would have relayed this information to Cohen and also mentioned it in his April 2018 interview, but he did not do that.[15][19] Instead, his message in 2016 gave Cohen (and Trump) "the impression that real tapes had existed" all that time.[98] In other words, according to New York Times reporter Madison Malone Kircher, "Team Trump thought they existed, according to the Mueller report."[99] Ruthann Robson also noted Trump's possible belief: "while the Mueller Report casts doubt on the tape's existence, the question of its existence — and the question of whether Trump believed it existed and acted accordingly — implicate national security issues, as well as the issues of obstruction that the Mueller Report raised."[100]
Judge Cooper later said Rtskhiladze "undercut" his claim that the tapes were fake by speaking as if getting secretly recorded could be a real consequence of indiscretions committed around Agalarov/Crocus:
As for Rtskhiladze's professed belief that the tapes were fake, that suggestion is somewhat undercut by Rtskhiladze's statement, only present in the Senate Report, suggesting that the tapes may have been real, and that they were 'what happens when you visit crocus I guess.'[16]
Cohen's testimony
[edit]By the time of Cohen's second deposition by the House Intelligence Committee on March 6, 2019, (which is cited in the Senate Intelligence Committee's report), the "pee tape" was a well-known term. The Committee discussed the Mueller Report's "Footnote 112", the pee tape, and Rtskhiladze's October 30, 2016, texts to Cohen. Cohen's testimony made it clear that (unbeknownst to either of them) Rtskhiladze's texts about the tapes he stopped were about what later became known as the dossier's "pee tape".[4] The day after the Steele dossier was published, and Rtskhiladze read the dossier's description of the alleged pee tape incident in 2013, he wrote an email showing he recognized the dossier's description of the pee tape also described the tapes he stopped in October 2016. Both tapes (which were really the same tapes) were "rumored to be held by Crocus Group". Judge Cooper wrote: "Rtskhiladze's own words as reproduced in the Senate Report show that he, at the very least, suspected in 2017 that the tapes referred to in his texts with Cohen and the tapes mentioned in the Steele Dossier were one and the same."[g]
Under questioning by Representative Jackie Speier, Cohen described the tape stopped by Rtskhiladze as "the infamous pee tape when Mr. Trump was in Moscow for the Miss Universe Pageant". Speier asked: "It wasn't infamous then, was it?" and he replied: "Yes, yes. That the tape - the conversation about the tape has gone back almost a couple months past when they were there for the Miss Universe Pageant that that tape existed." (p. 227) When Speier asked "So you're suggesting you've known about the rumors about this tape for many years before October 30th?" he replied that he had talked to "many people" over the years:[4]
Cohen estimated that, over the course of several years, six different people contacted him regarding the alleged tape. Cohen stated that one individual threatened to release the alleged information if the individual was not paid a large sum of money. Cohen indicated that he would have been willing to pay the individual to suppress the information if it could be verified, but Cohen was never shown any evidence. Cohen has also said that individuals in the media contacted him regarding a tape of Trump. ... [T]hose individuals included David Pecker, Dylan Howard and Harvey Levin.
During her questioning of Cohen, Speier noted how that original rumor from 2013 did not die: "but it persists, and then you're hearing it again on October 30th". When Speier said "It does not become public knowledge until January of 2017, when BuzzFeed releases the Steele dossier." Cohen corrected her and confirmed there was some form of "public knowledge" of the pee tape before the Steele dossier: "That's not really true. There were conversations way before that. TMZ, Harvey Levin called me, said he had heard about the existence of it. You know, other people had heard of the existence of that tape."[4]
Pecker, Howard, and Levin
[edit]Michael Cohen testified that "over the course of several years, six different people contacted him regarding the alleged tape. ... [T]hose individuals included David Pecker, Dylan Howard and Harvey Levin."[2]
David Pecker is an American publishing executive, businessman, and was also the publisher of National Enquirer. In 2018, Pecker became embroiled in controversy regarding his involvement in catch and kill operations to buy exclusive rights to stories that might embarrass his friend Donald Trump, to prevent the stories from becoming public during Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.
Dylan Howard is an entertainment journalist and media executive best known for his work as editor-in-chief of the National Enquirer tabloid between 2014 and 2020, a period in which he and Pecker oversaw a number of scandals involving powerful figures, including Donald Trump.
Harvey Levin is an American television producer, legal analyst, journalist, and former lawyer.[228] He founded the celebrity news website TMZ in 2005, and later briefly served as the host of OBJECTified (2016–present), which aired on the Fox News Channel.
Steele's seven Russian sources
[edit]The founders of Fusion GPS said that Steele received the "hotel anecdote" from seven Russian sources.[49] The dossier[6] says the seven sources for the "golden showers" allegation included Sources D and E, and other sources that Howard Blum describes as [Steele's] "alphabet list of assets".[164] Some have been described:[6]
- "According to Source D, where s/he had been present"
- The episode was "confirmed by Source E (redacted) who said that s/he and
- several of the staff were aware of it at the time and subsequently. S/he believed it had happened in 2013. Source E provided an introduction for
- a company ethnic Russian operative to
- Source F, a female staffer at the hotel when TRUMP had stayed there, who also confirmed the story."
- (no description)
- (no description)
Other sources and incidents mentioned by Paul Wood
[edit]Besides the two sources he named, Paul Wood described some "other sources":
Steele has five other sources for the 'golden showers' story. One is the hotel manager, another a maid. Neither had first-hand information, the manager agreed it might have happened, the maid relayed gossip among the housekeeping staff. One is 'an American' who supposedly saw a row in the hotel reception about whether a group of prostitutes could go up to Trump's suite. This American is not Keith Schiller, Trump's bodyguard, who told a Congressional committee he had 'stopped' five prostitutes from trying to visit Trump. Another source was a friend of Danchenko, described as a Russian with a 'wide social network', who said the story was common knowledge around the Kremlin. Finally, there was another Danchenko contact, a 'former senior intelligence officer now a Kremlin official'.[40]
Wood described "new reporting" and more sources, including a pee tape watch party:
Since then, I'm told that Steele has had 'new reporting' about another Trump sexual encounter in the Ritz Carlton: just one woman this time, it's claimed, allegedly there the evening after the supposed bevy of urinating hookers. ... I found three sources, all claiming to have seen a Trump sex tape. One is a former US intelligence officer, who said a senior official in eastern Europe had shown him stills from 'one of the tapes'. The second source is in one of Russia's most feared mafia groups, who said they were the ones who had filmed Trump. He said the gang's leader joked about Trump to Putin: 'I gave you that putuch' – Russian criminal slang for the 'bottom' in prison sex. The third is a former colonel in Russia's intelligence services. He described the Kremlin elite gathering in a villa outside Moscow to watch the 'pee tape', tears of laughter streaking their faces. 'That is our candidate for President of the United States!'[40]
Igor Danchenko
[edit]Igor Danchenko worked for Christopher Steele's Orbis Business Intelligence as a major collector (a Primary Sub-source[229]) of information for the Steele dossier, including traveling to Moscow in early June 2016. When Danchenko first reported back to Steele of his findings in Moscow, he reported that:
the Russians had been targeting and cultivating Trump for years and had even gathered kompromat on him, specifically tales of weird sexual indiscretions that the collector said 'were an open secret' in Moscow. Steele was horrified. 'I thought I had heard and seen everything in my career,' he told associates.[14]
District Judge Anthony Trenga analyzed the question of Steele's sources and acknowledged that Steele had other sources than Danchenko. He countered Special Counsel John Durham's contention "that Danchenko was Steele's primary source of information for the Steele Reports writ large" by noting that Steele used other sources than Danchenko: "Nor is there any evidence that ... Steele only, or almost entirely, used Danchenko as his source for the Reports."[206]
Trenga described how Danchenko first learned of the rumor:
Danchenko argues that he never told, and there will be no evidence that he told, the FBI that his sources for the Ritz-Carlton allegations were Millian, Dolan, or Kuhlen. Instead, as he told the FBI in a January 25, 2017 interview, he first learned of the Ritz-Carlton Moscow allegations in early June 2016 [in Moscow] when an individual identified as 'I.V.' told him about 'a well-known story' regarding Trump's alleged salacious sexual activity at the hotel, and that he 'reported Trump's unorthodox sexual activity at the Ritz' [to Steele] as 'rumor and speculation' and that he had not been able to confirm the story.[206]
Trenga wrote that "Danchenko told FBI agents that he inquired with staff about the rumors involving Trump's purported sexual activity at the hotel, and that the hotel staff did not deny the veracity of those rumors. Danchenko also told the FBI in that same interview that he passed along to Steele the names of the hotel staff he spoke to."[206][39] Danchenko said "he found his sources credible but that he took their information with a 'grain of salt'".[39]
The FBI revealed that Danchenko was a very well-connected source whose role went far beyond the Steele dossier. Danchenko worked for the FBI as "an uncommonly valuable" confidential human source for several years after the Steele dossier was published:[230]
Helson testified that Danchenko's reports as a confidential informant were used by the FBI in 25 investigations and 40 intelligence reports during a nearly four-year period from March 2017 to October 2020. ... Danchenko, the FBI agent said, was considered 'a model' informant and 'reshaped the way the U.S. even perceives threats.' Helson said that none of his previous informants had ever had as many sub-sources as Danchenko and that others at the FBI have continued to ask in recent months for Danchenko's assistance amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Hope Hicks
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/16/Hope_Hicks_thumbs_up_on_8_November_2017_detail%2C_from-_Donald_Trump_and_staff_on_Air_Force_One_%28cropped%29.jpg/200px-Hope_Hicks_thumbs_up_on_8_November_2017_detail%2C_from-_Donald_Trump_and_staff_on_Air_Force_One_%28cropped%29.jpg)
As Trump's most personal aide in his inner circle, Hope Hicks was a close witness to every Trump scandal and controversy: "She was there for everything."[231] Along with awareness of many other Trump scandals and sexual misconduct allegations, it was later revealed that she became aware of the pee tape rumor on October 8, 2016.[136]
Trump's top strategist, Steve Bannon, revealed that Trump lawyer "Marc Kasowitz 'took care' of 100 women during the presidential campaign".[232] This all involved multiple tapes and hush money payments, creating confusion over which tape was being referred to, and this required that Hicks testify to a Congressional committee, exposing hers and Trump's early knowledge of the pee tape rumor.[136]
On October 7, 2016, news of the Donald Trump Access Hollywood tape broke, and the next day she learned of the pee tape from Trump campaign spokesperson Katrina Pierson.[136] Pierson told her that Harvey Levin of TMZ might have access to the pee tape. Hicks, realizing that Michael Cohen knew him, immediately reached out to Cohen and requested that he investigate the matter and report back to her.[136] Trump was on one of the three phone calls between Hicks and Cohen: "The affidavit identifies three calls involving Ms. Hicks and Mr. Cohen on the evening of October 8, 2016, including one, the first call that Mr. Trump joined."[131]
As part of its investigation of hush money payments related to Trump's affair with Karen McDougal and the Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal, the House Judiciary Committee had to investigate those phone calls. Therefore, Hicks was questioned about whether Trump ever directed her "to make public statements about the hush money payments during the campaign". She denied ever doing so.[136]
Due to confusion between the pee tape and the Access Hollywood tape, she had to explain the difference, and, in doing so, she made a new revelation of what the Trump campaign knew about the pee tape. She testified about her phone calls with Cohen:
[The calls were not] about the [Access Hollywood] tape; it was about ... rumors of a tape involving Mr. Trump in Moscow ... with Russian hookers, participating in some lewd activities. ... I wanted to make sure that I stayed on top of it before it developed any further, to try to contain it from spiraling out of control.[136]
She testified to the Committee that she and others in the Trump campaign already knew of the pee tape three months before the publication of the Steele dossier,[130] and that she and Michael Cohen discussed the pee tape with Trump in October 2016.[130] This information about Trump's early knowledge of the pee tape touched on the Mueller report's "Footnote 112"[19] and Comey's briefing of Trump at Trump Tower right before his inauguration.[221][233][18] At that time, Trump did not inform Comey that Cohen had told him about the pee tape rumor in late 2013, shortly after the Miss Universe pageant,[4] or that he had again heard about the pee tape from Hicks and Cohen on October 8.[17] He also said nothing about Cohen's October 30 communications with Giorgi Rtskhiladze, a fact Mueller drew attention to by writing "Footnote 112".[19][106][107][108]
Intelligence sources and agencies
[edit]Robert Manne, referring to a January 11, 2017, report by Paul Wood, wrote that "Independent [from the dossier] evidence about Trump as a potential victim of sexual blackmail emerged soon after the publication of the dossier."[234]
On January 11, 2017, Paul Wood, of BBC News, described those "independent" sources and wrote that Steele was "not the only source" for claims about Russian kompromat on Trump, and that multiple intelligence sources were privately reporting about kompromat before the publication of the dossier:
And the former MI6 agent is not the only source for the claim about Russian kompromat on the president-elect. Back in August, a retired spy told me he had been informed of its existence by 'the head of an East European intelligence agency'. Later, I used an intermediary to pass some questions to active duty CIA officers dealing with the case file - they would not speak to me directly. I got a message back that there was 'more than one tape', 'audio and video', on 'more than one date', in 'more than one place' - in the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow and also in St Petersburg - and that the material was 'of a sexual nature'. The claims of Russian kompromat on Mr Trump were 'credible', the CIA believed.[27]
Briefings of Obama and Trump about rumor
[edit]On January 5, 2017, the chiefs of four U.S. intelligence agencies briefed President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden about the Russian interference in the election and the existence of the dossier and its allegations. They were Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers.[218][235][236]
On the afternoon[212]: 180 of January 6, 2017, President-elect Trump and his transition team received a similar briefing from the same group of top intelligence chiefs in Trump Tower.[221] They informed Trump of the Russian election interference,[18][233] and Comey told them of "a piece of Steele's reporting that indicated Russia had files of derogatory information on both Clinton and the President-elect".[212]: 180
Then, according to a pre-arranged plan, Brennan, Clapper, and Rogers left, and Comey then asked to speak with Trump alone. Comey then informed Trump of the dossier and its allegations about salacious tapes held by the Russians. Comey later reported he was very nervous. The previous day, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security told Comey to "be very careful", "choose your words carefully", and then "get outta there". Trump became very defensive, and Comey described the meeting as "really weird".[233][18] Trump later expressed that he felt James Comey was trying to blackmail him at the meeting in Trump Tower, held two weeks before the inauguration.[221]
Trump dissembled by not telling Comey that he had known of the pee tape rumor since shortly after he left the Ritz-Carlton hotel and 2013 Miss Universe pageant.[17] He already knew about the "alleged compromising tapes of him in Moscow", allegations that "are separate from" the later Steele dossier. (p. 945)[2]}}
Publication of dossier
[edit]The first public mention of the rumor was on January 10, 2017, when CNN reported about the January 6, 2017, meeting in Trump Tower where Comey oriented Trump about the salacious aspects of the dossier. Before that, only a few people in intelligence circles, some journalists, some senior members of Congress, some other government officials in Washington, and some foreign officials knew of the dossier.[18][237]
Following the CNN report,[238] BuzzFeed News immediately published the dossier, thus bringing awareness of the pee tape rumor to the public.[6] Peter Strzok described the reaction as "the Internet equivalent of an atomic explosion". Referring to Congress, he wrote:
We had heard rumors that several of its members had seen the reporting, including Senator John McCain, who had been concerned enough that he had given a copy to Comey. But the majority of their colleagues on the Hill had not. This was the first time that most members of Congress had heard of it — and they suddenly seemed to be unable to talk about anything else.[120] (p. 196)
Notability and legacy of pee tape narrative
[edit]The rumor has been described as a "viral sensation",[128] and the "most notorious" of all the dossier's allegations.[9][39][40] "The 'pee tape' claim instantly overshadowed all the other Trump-Russia allegations in the Steele dossier",[54] which itself has been described as "one of the most explosive documents in modern political history"[239] and "perhaps the most controversial opposition research ever to emerge from a Presidential campaign".[240]
According to Tommy Vietor, "once a narrative enters the media ether, it can become uncontrollable. ... once a rumor gets some traction, it's almost impossible to fix it, even if it is false. The problem with the pee tape allegation is it is so graphic, it is so memorable, that it doesn't matter how many times you knock it down — people are going to remember it."[60]
When Steele was asked why the Russians hadn't released the tape, he replied "It hasn't needed to be released. ... I think the Russians felt they'd got pretty good value out of Donald Trump when he was president of the U.S."[34] The dossier asserts that the Russian authorities were "able to blackmail him if they so wished". As long as the alleged tape(s) aren't released, the threat has a lasting effect, because the Kremlin allegedly made the conditional nature of the arrangement clear to Trump, who "understood the Kremlin had given its word that [the kompromat] would not be deployed against the Republican presidential candidate given how helpful and co-operative his team had been over several years, and particularly of late."[6] (Report 97)[165][168]
The founders of Fusion GPS have written: "Ultimately, whether the incident detailed in the dossier is true or not is likely not of paramount importance. The Russians had ample kompromat against Trump and his top aides with or without any pee tape."[219]
Glenn Simpson believes the dossier interrupted a planned renewal of relationships between the United States and Russia that was "not in the interest of the United States"; that it supported the existing FBI investigation into Russian interference; and that it furthered understanding of "the covert relationship between the Trump campaign and the government of Russia".[241]
Journalist David Corn of Mother Jones describes how the "Trump gang" use the dossier as "a convenient foil, their false flag": "It was a clever ploy on the part of the Trump gang: Deny the unfounded—that Trump was caught on tape consorting with urinating prostitutes and that he conspired directly with Putin—to sidestep the damning reality that Trump and his aides betrayed the nation by both encouraging the Russian attack and trying to cover up Putin's sinister intervention."[242]
Commentary and context
[edit]A number of writers have shared their analyses and comments about the rumor's veracity or lack of same.
Writers, journalists, and Steele
[edit]- Seth Abramson, in his book Proof of Collusion, wrote that "the Agalarovs couldn't have missed" Trump's enthusiastic reaction to the sight of women peeing, and that his "delighted" reaction "may have informed the activities they wanted prostitutes to perform in front of Trump in his hotel suite in Moscow in November 2013, just 120 days after the risqué performance in Las Vegas".[12][83] He noted that Trump's public actions at an after-party after the Miss Universe contest, where Trump accosted two women,[71][84] provided kompromat for the Russians. He described how these public actions, which were disclosed before the Steele dossier was even written, were evidence that Trump was lying about being discrete in Moscow, that he was publicly careless, and that his deceptive denials showed "consciousness of guilt".[12][83][c]
- Jonathan Chait, an American pundit and writer for New York magazine, wrote an article entitled "I'm a Peeliever and You Should Be, Too".[11][70] He prefaced his further comments by saying: "I used to doubt that this episode really happened. I now believe it probably did. I am obviously far from certain, but since Steele's dossier came out, an accumulation of evidence has tipped the balance from unlikely to likely." Then he listed five reasons, with explanations, for why he thought we too should believe it likely happened:[11]
- Christopher Steele is credible.
- Trump is unhealthily obsessed with Obama.
- Trump has mixed his denials of the pee tape with obvious lies.
- Trump's alibi is at least partly false.
- Trump is comfortable with gross sexual behavior and can be blackmailed.
- Ashley Feinberg, journalist for Slate, investigated the pee tape rumor, especially the Presidential Suite, and linked to a 25-second "Piss Tape" video (at www.pisstape.org, now found at the Internet Archive) of the purported occurrence. She concluded that the "Piss Tape" video was fake, but "very far from being an obvious fake". A key discrepancy, according to Feinberg, was that the video appeared to show the Presidential Suite as it appeared after a 2015 renovation, despite the purported occurrence being in early November 2013, before the renovation occurred. The video has been in circulation since at least January 26, 2019.[59] Although she believes the "Piss Tape" video is fake, it was so convincing that she said: "The more I tried to prove to myself it wasn't real, the less confident I became in my own skepticism."[59][t]
- Feinberg, when referring to "this pee tape" (the one at pisstape.org), distinguishes between it and the missing alleged Moscow "pee tape": "The pee tape is fake. This pee tape, anyway. Whether this pee tape is the pee tape—perhaps you've heard of it as the 'piss tape,' or the 'pee-pee tape,' or the 'golden shower video'—is one of the things that are still unclear about it."[59]
- The Senate report mentions this tape:
The Committee is aware of a realistic and well-resourced, but fake, video of someone who looks like Trump portraying him in a situation consistent with the uncorroborated allegations that were made public in January of 2017. The video may have first appeared on the public internet in January of 2019.[2]
- Naomi Fry, a staff writer at The New Yorker, said:
To me, the oddest detail of all is the idea that defiling the bed after rather than before the Obamas occupied that Moscow suite—a years-late voodoo ritual—might count as taking revenge on the then President and First Lady. It is this bizarre logic that in fact seems most like Trump, with his crazed rage at perceived enemies and fixation on old offenses—chronology be damned!—and it is what might ultimately count as the true perversity here.[17]
- Michelle Goldberg's New York Times article "Lordy, Is There a Tape?" mentions Trump's "obsession with the rumored tape" and his lies to Comey "about why it couldn't be real", and concludes that if we found the pee tape existed, "it would prove" something "we already know", "that Trump is sexually debauched and longs to desecrate everything Obama touched".[243]
- She describes how his lies "are of more than voyeuristic interest". They are significant "because, like the former director of the F.B.I., we don't know if Trump has been compromised by Russia." She mentions a tendency for Trump observers to "avoid admitting what seems to be staring us all in the face ... the rather obvious possibility that Trump is being blackmailed."[243]
- She sees "Trump's phony alibi" as just part of the "evidence that the tape might be real". As more evidence, she points to Trump's visit to "The Act" nightclub in Las Vegas, five months before he visited Moscow, where Russians observed Trump watching a golden showers performance "with delight",[10] and its "at least two [acts] involving women simulating urination, a fairly specific kink". She notes that "his presence at the club tells us he may not find this sort of thing unbearably disgusting".[243]
- Martin Longman, web editor for the Washington Monthly, wrote: "There's a name for people who believe that the tape exists: peelievers. When I saw that Trump lied to Comey about spending a night at the hotel at all, it made me more of a peeliever."[17] Regarding the time of the alleged incident, he wrote:
I can't establish the exact time that Trump was at this shoot [music video for Emin], but he definitely did not sleep in. Even if [Trump] had gone straight to bed the night before, he probably would have gotten no more than four or five hours of sleep. Did Russian women show up at the Ritz Carlton that night? There are several reasons to believe they did, including that Christopher Steele was able to partially corroborate a rumor that he learned of from a conversation that took place in New York City several years later by having sources talk to staff at the hotel in Moscow. I also think it’s interesting that Keith Schiller felt compelled to admit that the offer was made, even if he denied that Trump accepted it.[17]
- Jennifer Rubin wrote an opinion article for The Washington Post about Trump's fake alibi entitled "A false alibi could be strong evidence of guilt":
Maybe the Big Lie has worked in the past, but in legal or impeachment proceedings, it comes across as evidence of deceit. ... We return to the quintessential Trump dilemma: If he is innocent, why does he behave so much like a guilty man ...? ...
Once triers of fact (either at trial or in the court of public opinion) believe that an accused person is lying, it becomes awfully hard to convince them that there is good reason to lie. In this case, evidence of the coverup is so plentiful that ordinary people — not unreasonably — will assume guilt. Trump's penchant for lying, exaggerating, distorting and misremembering in ways that invariably line up with his unfounded assertions might finally do him in.[24]
- Roger Sollenberger, a senior political reporter for The Daily Beast, said he came to strongly believe the tape exists. He analyzed the issue and made a list of eight "strikes against the pee-pee tape" explaining why we should not believe the tape is real, and then he debunked all but one: "I can't prove I'm right. But I'm not trying to. All I can do is make a compelling argument that explains why, after being a total skeptic for months, I've slowly come to believe, strongly, that this hideous, ridiculous thing really is out there." He said it was worth writing about because "Russia might indeed have blackmail on our President."[u]
- He has also concluded it is the dossier allegation with "the most sources attached to it, all of them independent":
Throughout the dossier, Steele is surprisingly honest about qualifying his sketchy sources as sketchy. He never professes certainty about anything. But he doesn't caveat the golden shower report. That report, the most unbelievable one, notably also has the most sources attached to it, all of them independent.
And the improbable fact is that, so far, nothing substantial in the dossier has been proven untrue, with the exceptions of some misspellings or a description that's slightly off here and there. And in fact, the dossier is becoming increasingly corroborated.[50]
- Christopher Steele said he believes that 70–90% of the dossier is accurate.[244] "[Steele] treated everything in the dossier as raw intelligence material—not proven fact."[9][45] Regarding the "golden showers" allegation, Michael Isikoff and David Corn have stated that Steele's "faith in the sensational sex claim would fade over time. ... As for the likelihood of the claim that prostitutes had urinated in Trump's presence, Steele would say to colleagues, 'It's 50–50'."[14]
- On October 17, 2021, in Steele's first major interview, George Stephanopoulos, of ABC News, asked him if he thought the "pee tape" was real. Steele answered that it "probably does exist", but he "wouldn't put 100 percent certainty on it". When he was asked why the Russians hadn't released it, he replied "It hasn't needed to be released. ... I think the Russians felt they'd got pretty good value out of Donald Trump when he was president of the U.S."[34]
- In their book Crime In Progress, Glenn R. Simpson and Peter Fritsch write: "Steele remains confident that the Ritz allegation is not disinformation, a hoax, or the fabrication of a fantasist. Ultimately, whether the incident detailed in the dossier is true or not is likely not of paramount importance. The Russians had ample kompromat against Trump and his top aides with or without any pee tape."[219]
Comedians and shows
[edit]Immediately following the publication of the Steele dossier on January 10, 2017, comedians naturally provided a stream of jokes, as well as serious commentary, about the pee tape rumor. Twitter was "flooded" with jokes and "a stream of pee puns", with hashtags like #GoldenShowers, #PeeTape, and #PEEOTUS trending.[245] By the next day, there were about 70,000 jokes on Twitter about the matter.[246]
Serious commentary
[edit]- Seth Meyers, on his show Late Night with Seth Meyers, had a humorous monologue about the pee tape. After listening to Comey's account of how Trump asked him to investigate the pee tape, Meyers exclaimed:
Oh my God, it's real. It has to be. Why would you ask the FBI Director to investigate a pee tape if you knew for a fact that pee tape definitely didn't exist? ... You know, I've always thought the pee tape was real, and here's how I know.[247]
- Then Seth's monologue continued, including playing a Fox News interview with Trump denying the tape existed, yet explaining how it would embarrass him if such a tape did show up.[247] After Trump brought up the tape many years later, Meyers quipped:
'My favorite part is when he said Melania didn't believe that one, like there are plenty of other stories she definitely believed.' Impersonating Trump, Meyers said: 'She didn't believe the golden-showers story, but when the news broke that I asked a porn star to spank me with a Forbes magazine while we watch Shark Week, she said, 'That sounds like my Donald.'[124]
- David Pakman, host of the The David Pakman Show, delved into the odd fact that Trump lied about the pee tape when a normal person would not need to do so:
These are not normal reactions. ... So, lie confirmed about the pee tape stuff. It's not actually about the pee tape but about the fact that Trump has been caught lying again about something that a normal person would just say 'I didn't do that, and there is no evidence that I did it because it didn't happen.'[248]
- Cenk Uygur, host of The Young Turks, reviewed the evidence that debunked Trump's phony alibi that he didn't overnight in Moscow. Then he said:
You have to ask the question: Why would you lie about that if you didn't do the 'golden showers' thing? And then he got his personal security guy to also lie for him, but that lie also exposed what really happened.' [Then he quotes from Politico's coverage about Schiller's testimony that showed Trump did overnight in Moscow.] Uygur concluded: 'There's Donald Trump in a nutshell for you guys. So now, given that he is clearly lying, clearly covering it up, clearly stayed in Russia that night, the Steele dossier said that he stayed there in that hotel, I now believe there is a pretty good chance that tape exists.'[78]
Comedic coverage
[edit]The Steele dossier was published on January 10, 2017, and late night shows and comedians "could barely contain their schadenfreude".[249] They immediately exploited the sensational theme to their fans' great amusement with all kinds of toilet humor jokes that were "saturated", "streaming", and "dripping" with "yellow journalism".[249][250][251][252][253] Twitter also struck "comedy gold with stream of jokes over Trump report".[254]
- Among them were Samantha Bee,[255] Conan O'Brien,[256] James Corden,[250][257] Jimmy Kimmel,[249] Seth Meyers,[247][124] Trevor Noah,[250] David Pakman,[248] Saturday Night Live,[251][252] Sam Seder,[258] and Cenk Uygur.[78] A whole fictional episode of the legal drama The Good Fight featured the pee tape and a woman who claimed to be one of the prostitutes involved in the incident.[250][253]
- Stephen Colbert, host of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, has repeatedly joked about the pee tape on his show.[249][93][259][260][261]
- CBS and Colbert took the subject further than others. In 2017, Colbert and CBS decided to investigate the dossier rumor by traveling to Moscow, renting, and overnighting in the Presidential Suite where the pee tape incident allegedly took place. CBS filmed the suite and made it the subject of an episode on The Late Show.[260][262][263]
- When James Comey appeared on the The Late Show, Comey asked Colbert if the Ritz-Carlton's Presidential Suite was large enough to handle the alleged "pee tape" activity, since Trump claimed to be a germaphobe. Colbert joked that "it was plenty big enough to have kept Trump in the 'splash-free zone'". The episode was the third-highest Late Show rating ever.[264]
Litigation involving pee tape rumor
[edit]Future article: "Litigation involving Steele dossier" Cases below will be removed.
Multiple lawsuits have been filed in connection with the Steele dossier, primarily involving defamation claims by plaintiffs such as Aleksej Gubarev, the three owners of Alfa-Bank (Mikhail Fridman, Petr Aven, and German Khan), Michael Cohen, Devin Nunes, Giorgi Rtskhiladze and Carter Page against Christopher Steele, BuzzFeed, Oath, Orbis, Democratic National Committee and others. All of these defamation cases, except one, were dismissed or withdrawn by the plaintiffs, and one is under appeal.
Carter Page unsuccessfully sought damages in a lawsuit against the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and several former U.S. government officials, alleging violations of his constitutional rights. Donald Trump also filed unsuccessful lawsuits against Hillary Clinton, Steele, Orbis, and others.
Rtskhiladze v. Mueller
[edit]CASE: Rtskhiladze v. Mueller, Complaint, Case 1:20-cv-01591-CRC.
FILED: June 17, 2020.[227]
On June 17, 2020, Giorgi Rtskhiladze sued Robert Mueller and the Department of Justice in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for defamation related to the mention of Rtskhiladze in footnote 112 in the Mueller Report. He is "seeking $100 million in damages and an injunction that would force DOJ to hastily remove all future references to him in the Mueller Report".[265]
There are two points of contention. Rtskhiladze, a Georgia-American businessman, claims that he was falsely identified as a "Russian businessman" in the footnote. He is a U.S. citizen who was born in Georgia, a former Soviet republic, who emigrated to the U.S. in 1991. The other point of contention is the omission of one word in that footnote. In the original email to Cohen, Rtskhiladze claimed to have "Stopped flow of some tapes from Russia..." In the Mueller report's footnote 112,[19] the word "some" was omitted. The lawsuit claims "The omission of 'some' in the quoted text is significant," the lawsuit notes."'Stopped the flow of tapes' suggests familiarity with their content while 'stopped flow of some tapes' indicates a lack of familiarity with their content."[265] The suit was dismissed on September 1, 2021 for lack of standing on his equitable claims and other claims.[266]
On August 9, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that Rtskhiladze has standing to bring equitable claims. The lower court's decision was reversed and remanded.
Case remanded and reopened
[edit]This is an appeal, so all court details and numbers should be included in this subsection. The following will need some work and sourcing, but it includes the essential details:
On DATE Rtskhiladze filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The court reversed "the district court's decision to dismiss Rtskhiladze's equitable claims for lack of standing and remand to the district court to address DOJ's motion to dismiss them for failure to state a claim." The court considered three issues: "(1) Rtskhiladze’s equitable claims; (2) his damages claim; and (3) his alleged right to obtain a copy of the transcript of his grand jury testimony." SOURCE The court determined that Rtskhiladze does have standing to make his equitable and damages claims, but, because he did not plausibly state a claim for monetary relief or even attempt to meet the Privacy Act's requirements, his damages claim was dismissed, meaning he will not be allowed to seek monetary damages from Mueller and the DOJ. He was also denied his renewed demand to receive a copy of the transcript of his grand jury testimony. SOURCE
INFO DUMP
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 30, 2023 Decided August 9, 2024 No. 21-5243 GIORGI RTSKHILADZE, APPELLANT v. ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, SPECIAL COUNSEL FOR THE INVESTIGATION INTO RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, APPELLEES Consolidated with 22-3037 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:20-cv-01591) (No. 1:21-gj-00048)
Before: SRINIVASAN, Chief Judge, WALKER and PAN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALKER.
I. Analysis We consider three issues: (1) Rtskhiladze’s equitable claims; (2) his damages claim; and (3) his alleged right to obtain a copy of the transcript of his grand jury testimony. A. Equitable Claims Rtskhiladze has standing to bring his equitable claims.
We disagree. A government report (like the Senate
Report) does not extinguish the harm from an earlier
government report (like the Mueller Report) “where
reputational injury derives directly from an unexpired and
unretracted government action.”
"We therefore reverse the district court’s decision to
dismiss Rtskhiladze’s equitable claims for lack of standing and
remand to the district court to address DOJ’s motion to dismiss
them for failure to state a claim. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).6"
B. Damages Claim Like the district court, we hold that Rtskhiladze has standing to seek damages for injuries that DOJ allegedly inflicted before the Senate Report’s release. Unlike the district court, we hold that Rtskhiladze also has standing to seek damages for injuries inflicted after that point.
That said, Rtskhiladze has failed to plausibly state a claim for monetary relief.
Because Rtskhiladze has not even attempted to meet the Privacy Act’s requirements, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of his damages claim.
C. Obtaining the Grand Jury Transcript The district court did not err by denying Rtskhiladze’s request to obtain a copy of the transcript of his grand jury testimony.
III. Conclusion The district court held that Rtskhiladze lacked standing to bring his equitable claims. We reverse that decision and remand those claims. We agree with the district court that Rtskhiladze has standing to bring his damages claim for alleged injuries suffered before the Senate Report’s release. But unlike the district court, we conclude that Rtskhiladze also has standing to sue for damages for alleged harms after the Senate Report’s release. Though Rtskhiladze has standing to sue for damages, he has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted. So we affirm the district court’s dismissal of that claim.
16
Finally, the district court concluded that Rtskhiladze is not
entitled to obtain a copy of his grand jury transcript. That
decision was not an abuse of discretion, so we affirm.
So ordered.
https://www.newsweek.com/obama-biden-trump-judges-deal-legal-blow-robert-mueller-1937266
https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1821911015069536762
Against Orbis Business Intelligence. Filed by Donald Trump
[edit]CASE: President Donald J. Trump -V- Orbis Business Intelligence Limited, Case No. KB-2022-004403. FILED: October 2023.[220][267]
In October 2023,[267] Trump filed an unsuccessful lawsuit in London against Orbis Business Intelligence and Steele (who was later removed from the suit) alleging that Orbis violated British data protection laws when compiling the dossier. Trump accused Steele of making "'shocking and scandalous claims' that were false and harmed his reputation".[268] Trump's witness statement said: "I can confirm that I did not, at any time engage in perverted sexual behaviour including the hiring of prostitutes to engage in 'golden showers' in the presidential suite of a hotel in Moscow."[267] Trump asserted "The inaccurate personal data in the Dossier has, and continues, to cause me significant damage and distress."[269]
On February 1, 2024, the High Court sided with Orbis and dismissed Trump's claim stating that the case was "bound to fail",[270] and that the filing was outside the six-year period of limitations.[271][272][220] In March 2024, Trump was ordered to pay legal fees of 300,000 pounds ($382,000) to Orbis.[270]
Trump appealed the decision, and his appeal was denied on March 30, 2024.[273]
Against Igor Danchenko. Filed by John Durham
[edit]CASE: United States of America v. Igor Y. Danchenko, Case No. 1:21-cr-245-AJT-1. INDICTMENT FILED: November 3, 2021.[274] ORDER FILED: October 4, 2022.[206]
In November 2021, as part of the Durham special counsel investigation, Igor Danchenko was indicted[89][274] by John Durham on five counts of making false statements to the FBI about the identities of his sources[275] but "not about the information [in the dossier] itself".[276] Danchenko pleaded not guilty to all charges.[275] At trial, Durham's faulty cases were picked apart:
"During closing arguments in both the Sussmann and Danchenko cases, defense lawyers pointed to evidence they said showed that Mr. Durham and his team had lost their way, ignoring signs of serious flaws in their cases because they were so intent on convicting someone. 'I submit to you that if this trial has proven anything, it’s that the special counsel’s investigation was focused on proving crimes at any cost as opposed to investigating whether any occurred,' Mr. Sears said on Monday."[277]
The cases were so defective they "both crumbled",[277] leading U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga to acquit Danchenko of all charges in October 2022.[278]
During his trial, two FBI officials revealed that Danchenko was "an uncommonly valuable" confidential human source for several years after the Steele dossier was published, and whose role went far beyond the Steele dossier:[230]
Helson testified that Danchenko's reports as a confidential informant were used by the FBI in 25 investigations and 40 intelligence reports during a nearly four-year period from March 2017 to October 2020. ... Danchenko, the FBI agent said, was considered 'a model' informant and 'reshaped the way the U.S. even perceives threats.' Helson said that none of his previous informants had ever had as many sub-sources as Danchenko and that others at the FBI have continued to ask in recent months for Danchenko's assistance amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
All the Trump tapes
[edit]There are several tapes mentioned in connection with Trump, and that can create confusion. Some are real and some are alleged.
- Donald Trump Access Hollywood tape: Recorded discussion between Donald Trump and Billy Bush in 2005 in which Trump describes his habit of sexually assaulting women without first getting their permission: "You can do anything. ... Grab 'em by the pussy." Hope Hicks described it as "confusing" when it was mentioned at the same time as the pee tape.[136]
- Multiple embarrassing tapes: Intelligence agencies assert there are multiple embarrassing tapes of Trump in Russia that are held by Russian intelligence.[25] Paul Wood reported that
active duty CIA officers dealing with the case file [reported] there was 'more than one tape', 'audio and video', on 'more than one date', in 'more than one place' - in the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow and also in St Petersburg - and that the material was 'of a sexual nature'. The claims of Russian kompromat on Mr Trump were 'credible', the CIA believed.[27]
- "Further sex tapes": After the publication of the Steele dossier, Steele continued to supply the FBI with new information from new "'hermetically-sealed' main agent networks". This resulted in "a second dossier for the FBI on Donald Trump". It included further claims of Russian election meddling, "alleged Russian interference linked to Mr Trump and his associates", and claims about the "existence of further sex tapes".[279]
- Donald Trump pee tape rumor and kompromat: Alleged tape of prostitutes performing a golden showers show for Trump at the Ritz-Carlton Moscow hotel in November 2013. The rumor is real.[49][50]
- Trump pee tape, an allegation first mentioned publicly in the 2016 Steele Dossier.
- Ritz-Carlton elevator tape: Alleged tape of Trump with prostitutes in hotel elevator in November 2013.[63][1]
- Trump Tower elevator tape of Melania with Donald Trump: Alleged tape of Trump hitting Melania while in an elevator, an allegation he denies.[280][281]
- Tapes of Trump on The Apprentice: Tapes where Trump allegedly makes embarrassing off-screen comments about women and makes racial slurs. Tom Arnold searched for the tapes, but Mark Burnett, the show's producer, would not release them.[282][283]
- The Trump Tapes, 2022 audiobook release of interviews between Donald Trump and journalist Bob Woodward.
See also
[edit]- Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations
- E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump
- False or misleading statements by Donald Trump
- Golden shower controversy
- Karen McDougal § Affair with Donald Trump
- Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal
- Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
- Trump: The Kremlin Candidate?
Notes
[edit]- ^ a b c Cohen said he talked to "many people. Over the course of the years, I must have had half a dozen people reach out." Someone even tried to sell him the tape.[4] At least twenty named people were aware before the dossier was written.
- ^ a b c d e See also: "Many doubt Trump":[50][11][23][37][13]
- ^ a b c d e f g h i See also: #Consciousness of guilt:[23][24][37][93][104][110][122][123][124][125]
- ^ a b c d e f See also: "Time of incident":[17][21][20][55][59]
- ^ a b c d e f g Rtskhiladze "assessed that if compromising material existed, Crocus Group [the Agalarovs] would likely be responsible"[2][16]
- ^ a b Lawfare: "So the first point to bear in mind is that the Trump Tower meeting was arranged by a Russian oligarch with ties to organized crime and to Putin.
The second key point is that the Agalarovs had been cultivating Trump for some time. Trump met the Agalarovs in 2013 through efforts to bring the Miss Universe pageant, which Trump owned, to Moscow. This alone is nothing new. But the report also suggests—without stating outright—that the event, including the involvement and support of the Agalarovs, was likely a Russian effort to gain influence over Trump. ...
The report contains an incredibly detailed tick-tock of events and interactions leading up to the pageant. ... and stories of multiple efforts by Trump to obtain a meeting with Vladimir Putin—which, according to the president of the Miss Universe Organization, was highly unusual. ... and the president of the Miss Universe Organization remembered Trump asking her to falsely say that Putin had attended."[1] - ^ a b Both Michael Cohen and Giorgi Rtskhiladze revealed the dossier described the pee tape(s) they had been chasing since shortly after the rumor started, that it described the tapes Rtskhiladze had stopped, and that Rtskhiladze suspected the pee tape(s) and the stopped tapes to be "one and the same" tape(s).[16]
- ^ a b c d e f See also: #Criticisms of bodyguard":[1][41][59][78][79][80][81][82]
- ^ a b c d "Schiller known to aid Trump's secretive affairs with women"[1][56][57][58][59]
- ^ The British word "row" means "a noisy or violent argument" (Oxford English Dictionary)
- ^ "[Trump] took hold of Shaumyan's arm and said, "Don't go. Stay. Stay." Shaumyan took selfies with him. (She later produced five photos and a video of her with Trump that night.) But nothing further happened. Trump later had somebody give Shaumyan his business card with his phone number on it. She never called."[41][72]
- ^ "Goldstone said he was told that the bags had been packed and were in the car and that Trump left the party directly to the airport. ... Paula Shugart also recalled that Trump left directly for the airport."[2]
- ^ See also: #Accusations of "nitpicking". Trump's lies combined paltering[95][96] and omission, an advanced type of lying.[97]
- ^ a b "Acted as if tape was real":[98][99][100][16][24]
- ^ a b c d See also: #Vulnerability to blackmail":[69][57][146][147][71][83][84][41][72]
- ^ Although Durham insinuated, without proof, that Dolan was the likely source of the pee tape allegation in the dossier (a claim Dolan vehemently denied), Durham did not repeat that insinuation in the [Danchenko] indictment. It did not claim that Dolan "was the source for specific claims about the purported tape".[88]
- ^ a b "I felt this was exactly how it had been described to me, which was a rumor. Nonetheless, I wanted to make sure that I stayed on top of it before it developed any further, to try to contain it from spiraling out of control. And the person that made me aware of the rumor said that TMZ might be the person that has access to this tape. I knew Michael Cohen had a good relationship with Harvey Levin, who works at TMZ. So I reached out to Michael to ask if he had heard of anything like this; if Harvey contacted him, if he could be in touch with me."[136]
- ^ "Girls accosted in Moscow"[41][71][72][83][84]
- ^ "The Claimant states, in a witness statement dated 27 July 2023, that he was first made aware of the existence of the Dossier by then FBI Director James Comey on 6 January 2018[sic], at a meeting that took place during the transition period following his election."[220]
- ^ Ashley Feinberg: "There are a number of reasons to believe that this pee tape would be real, and there are also a number of reasons to believe it is not. One reason to believe it is real is that it does exist—an extremely lifelike, extremely grainy video clip depicting Trump in the presidential suite of the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow, while two nude or near-nude women cavort in front of him—and you can watch it right now. The more I tried to prove to myself it wasn't real, the less confident I became in my own skepticism."[59]
- ^ Roger Sollenberger: "And I've also come to believe the stupid thing is actually worth writing about, for two reasons: Russia might indeed have blackmail on our President; and if we can believe this accusation is true, we can also believe the more reasonable (and more damning) accusations are true, such as, say, Donald Trump committed treason and exploited his own voters to win an election. The truth is, the pee-pee tape is fairly likely to be real, and it's not (entirely) wishful thinking. I'll show you why by refuting all but one of those arguments above."[50]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad Wittes, Benjamin (August 21, 2020). "A Collusion Reading Diary: What Did the Senate Intelligence Committee Find?". Lawfare. Retrieved October 17, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs Senate Intelligence Committee (SIC) (August 18, 2020). "Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russian interference in the 2016 United States presidential election, Volume 5: Counterintelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities" (PDF). Senate Intelligence Committee. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 22, 2021. Retrieved December 27, 2023.
- ^ a b c "Ex-FBI agent Strzok due out with book about Trump, Russia". NBC News. July 28, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s "Deposition of Michael Cohen, Part 2" (PDF). House Intelligence Committee. March 6, 2019. pp. 225–229, 235–236, 254.
- ^ a b c d e f Sipher, John (September 6, 2017). "A Second Look at the Steele Dossier". Just Security. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Bensinger, Ken; Elder, Miriam; Schoofs, Mark (January 10, 2017). "These Reports Allege Trump Has Deep Ties To Russia". BuzzFeed News. Retrieved December 24, 2017.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Bertrand, Natasha (November 10, 2017). "Trump's bodyguard's testimony raises new questions about the most salacious allegations in the dossier". Business Insider. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e Parfitt, Tom (January 12, 2017). "Putin spies 'taped Trump sex game with prostitutes'". The Sunday Times. Retrieved January 21, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Mayer, Jane (March 13, 2018). "A Trump Trip to Las Vegas Adds Intrigue to the Steele Dossier". The New Yorker. Retrieved June 1, 2020.
- ^ a b c d e Zoellner, Danielle (September 6, 2020). "Michael Cohen claims Trump watched 'with delight' during sex act performance in Vegas". The Independent. Retrieved October 15, 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f g Chait, Jonathan (April 13, 2018). "I'm a Peeliever and You Should Be, Too. 5 Reasons the Pee Tape Is Probably Real". Intelligencer. Retrieved April 16, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g Abramson, Seth (2018). Proof of Collusion: How Trump Betrayed America. Simon & Schuster. p. 448. ISBN 978-1-471-182402.
"may have informed the activities they wanted prostitutes to perform in front of Trump in his hotel suite in Moscow in November 2013, just 120 days after the risqué performance in Las Vegas.
- ^ a b c d e f g Nemtsova, Anna (January 20, 2017). "She Met Donald Trump at the Moscow Ritz (Not That Way!)". The Daily Beast. Retrieved December 1, 2019.
Prostitutes around the city say the 'golden shower' orgy story is true.
- ^ a b c d e f Isikoff, Michael; Corn, David (March 17, 2018). "Russian Roulette: the real story behind the Steele dossier on Donald Trump". Australian Financial Review. Retrieved May 10, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Kessler, Glenn (April 24, 2019). "What the Steele dossier said vs. what the Mueller report said". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "Rtskhiladze v. Mueller, Opinion, 20-cv-1591 (CRC)". United States District Court for the District of Columbia. September 1, 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Longman, Martin (April 20, 2018). "Trump Lied to Comey About the Pee Tape". Washington Monthly. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e Perez, Evan; Sciutto, Jim; Tapper, Jake; Bernstein, Carl (January 10, 2017). "Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him". CNN. Retrieved January 11, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III (March 2019). "Mueller Report: Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election. Volumes I and II". Department of Justice. Retrieved April 2, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e Dilanian, Ken; Allen, Jonathan (November 9, 2017). "Bodyguard rejected Russian offer of 5 women for Trump". NBC News. Retrieved December 2, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g Helderman, Rosalind S. (September 22, 2018). "How a British music publicist ended up in the middle of the Russia storm". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
- ^ a b Marshall, Josh (April 20, 2018). "Comey Memos: Clear Proof Trump Repeatedly Lied About His Trip To Moscow". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved April 19, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g Foran, Clare (April 26, 2018). "Comey on Trump's assertion that releasing memos was illegal: 'He's just making stuff up'". CNN. Retrieved July 29, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Rubin, Jennifer (April 24, 2018). "A false alibi could be strong evidence of guilt". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
- ^ a b c d Palma, Bethania (February 2, 2021). "Did Ex-KGB Spy Say Russia Cultivated Trump as an 'Asset' for 40 Years?". Snopes. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
- ^ VanSickle, Abbie (April 6, 2017). "Confused by Trump's Russia Ties? This timeline breaks it down for you". Medium. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Wood, Paul (January 12, 2017). "Trump 'compromising' claims: How and why did we get here?". BBC. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
- ^ a b c Sheth, Sonam (August 30, 2019). "US spies say Trump's G7 performance suggests he's either a 'Russian asset' or a 'useful idiot' for Putin". Business Insider. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
- ^ a b "Clapper: I wonder if Russians have something on Trump". CNN. July 19, 2018. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
- ^ a b Weiner, Tim (September 21, 2020). "The unanswered question of our time: Is Trump an agent of Russia?". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
- ^ a b c Weiner, Tim (September 20, 2020). "Trump Makes America More Like Russia Every Day". The Daily Beast. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
- ^ a b Sforza, Lauren (January 16, 2024). "Former UK spy chief says Trump reelection is national security threat". The Hill. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
- ^ a b c Tucker, Eric; Day, Chad (September 1, 2018). "AP sources: Former spy said Russia had 'Trump over a barrel'". Associated Press. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
- ^ a b c Bruggeman, Lucien; Mosk, Matthew (October 17, 2021). "Confronting his critics, Christopher Steele defends controversial dossier in first major interview". ABC News. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e Davidson, Adam (July 19, 2018). "A Theory of Trump Kompromat". The New Yorker. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
- ^ a b Mitchell, Taiyler S. (October 14, 2021). "Trump brought up an unsubstantiated claim in the Steele dossier to the National Republican Senatorial Committee: 'I'm not into golden showers'". Business Insider. Retrieved July 23, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Hartmann, Margaret (October 15, 2021). "Does Trump Want Me to Think He's Into Golden Showers?". Intelligencer. Retrieved December 17, 2023.
- ^ a b c "Video and Transcript: James Comey's interview with ABC News chief anchor George Stephanopoulos". ABC News. April 15, 2018. Retrieved December 27, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam; Kessel, Jonah M. (October 21, 2020). "Analyst Who Reported the Infamous Trump Tape Rumor Wants to Clear His Name". The New York Times. Retrieved December 3, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Wood, Paul (August 12, 2020). "Was the 'pee tape' a lie all along? Not necessarily: despite what his critics say, Christopher Steele's 'dossier' has not been 'discredited'". The Spectator. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w Corn, David; Isikoff, Michael (March 8, 2018). "What Happened in Moscow: The Inside Story of How Trump's Obsession With Putin Began". Mother Jones. Retrieved April 15, 2018.
- ^ a b c Swaine, Jon; Walker, Shaun (September 18, 2017). "Trump in Moscow: what happened at Miss Universe in 2013". The Guardian. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
- ^ a b c d Alexander, Dan; Behar, Richard (August 20, 2020). "Trump's Business Partners Allegedly Involved In Human Trafficking, Mafia Matters, Probable Money Laundering". Forbes. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ Diamond, Jeremy (July 13, 2017). "Exclusive: Video shows Trump with associates tied to email controversy". CNN. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e Blake, Aaron (August 21, 2020). "Five provocative nuggets from the Senate intel report on Trump and Russia". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 9, 2020.
- ^ Roeben, Scott (October 14, 2013). "The Act at Palazzo, That Club You Never Went To, Is Closed". Vital Vegas. Retrieved November 30, 2023.
- ^ a b c Stapleton, Susan (June 16, 2013). "Haute Event: Donald Trump Treats Miss USA Nana Meriwether and Miss Universe Olivia Culpo to a Night at The Act". Haute Living. Retrieved February 12, 2024.
- ^ Aggeler, Madeleine (April 18, 2019). "Absolutely Every Single Thing We Know About the Pee Tape". The Cut. Retrieved December 2, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f Ewing, Philip (November 22, 2019). "In 'Crime In Progress,' Fusion GPS Chiefs Tell The Inside Story Of The Steele Dossier". NPR. Retrieved December 1, 2019.
- ^ a b c d e Sollenberger, Roger (June 13, 2017). "I'm Not a Nutjob: Here Are Eight Reasons the Trump Pee-Pee Tape is Real". Paste Magazine. Retrieved December 13, 2023.
- ^ Warren, Katie (January 14, 2020). "I spent a night in the $18,000-a-night presidential suite at the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow made infamous by the Steele dossier. Here's what it was like". Business Insider. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
- ^ a b c Stein, Jeff (January 10, 2017). "Trump, Russian spies and the infamous 'golden shower memos'". Newsweek. Retrieved January 21, 2018.
- ^ Price, Greg (December 21, 2017). "What's True in the Trump 'Golden Shower' Dossier? Salacious Report Dogged President Throughout 2017". Newsweek. Retrieved December 24, 2017.
- ^ a b Prokop, Andrew (April 15, 2018). "The "pee tape" claim, explained". Vox. Retrieved September 13, 2018.
- ^ a b Bergmann, Max; Venook, Jeremy; Moscow Project Team (November 27, 2018). "Conspiracy Against the United States: The Story of Trump and Russia". Center for American Progress Action. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ Briquelet, Kate (April 17, 2018). "The Trump Super Fixer Who 'Knows Where All the Bodies Are Buried'". The Daily Beast. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
- ^ a b c d Farrow, Ronan (February 16, 2018). "Donald Trump, a Playboy Model, and a System for Concealing Infidelity". The New Yorker. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
- ^ Meyer, Josh (May 10, 2024). "These potential witnesses could clear up Trump, Stormy Daniels' drama". USA Today. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Feinberg, Ashley (September 25, 2019). "The Pee Tape Is Real, but It's Fake". Slate. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
The central premise of the pee tape story is that on Nov. 9, 2013, while he was in Moscow for the Miss Universe pageant, Trump watched prostitutes perform sex acts involving urination on the bed of the presidential suite at the Moscow Ritz-Carlton, and he was secretly filmed as it happened.
- ^ a b c d e Parker, Ashley (April 13, 2018). "Real or 'fake news'? Either way, allegations of lewd tape pose challenge for Trump". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 20, 2023.
- ^ Haglage, Abby (April 13, 2017). "Donald Trump's 4-Hour Sleep Habit Could Explain His Personality". The Daily Beast. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ a b "Time Zone Calculator". calculator.net. Retrieved May 23, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e Schmidt, Michael S. (August 23, 2020). "Trump and Miss Moscow: Report Examines Possible Compromises in Russia Trips". The New York Times. Retrieved November 9, 2020.
- ^ a b c d Papisova, Vera (January 11, 2017). "If You're Making Jokes About Donald Trump's Sex Life, You're Missing the Point". Teen Vogue. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
- ^ Budryk, Zack (September 9, 2020). "Michael Cohen: Trump hates Obama because he's everything he 'wants to be'". The Hill. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ "Michael Cohen Claims Trump's Hatred for Obama is "Purely Racial"". YouTube. The View (official account). September 14, 2020. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ "President Obama's Long History of Insulting Donald Trump". ABC News. November 10, 2016. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ Taddonio, Patrice (September 22, 2016). "Inside the Night President Obama Took On Donald Trump". Frontline. PBS. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ a b c Chait, Jonathan (February 16, 2018). "There's a Pretty Good Chance President Trump Is Being Blackmailed". Intelligencer. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
Ronan Farrow's new story shows that Trump habitually pays for sex. He had an affair with former Playboy Playmate Karen McDougal, and offered her money after sex, which she turned down. At another point in the story, he offered adult entertainer Jessica Drake $10,000 for 'her company.'"
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Silver, Vernon (April 23, 2018). "Flight Records Illuminate Mystery of Trump's Moscow Nights". Bloomberg News. Retrieved April 24, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e Eriksen, Alex (January 14, 2017). "Who Is Kata Sarka? This Hungarian Beauty Claims Donald Trump Made a Pass at Her". Yahoo! Life. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
[She is described as a "Hungarian celebrity", not "Miss Hungary".] Sarka was not a contestant that year but claims to have been in Moscow for the event as the CEO of Magyarország Szépe Kft., the company that ran the Miss Universe Hungary pageant at the time. Hungary's contestant in 2013 was Rebeka Kárpáti.
- ^ a b c d Kentron/Shaumyan (March 17, 2018). "Kentron TV interview with Armenian actress, Edita Shaumyan". YouTube. Kentron TV (official account). Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ a b Lusher, Adam (April 24, 2018). "Flight records appear to disprove Trump's Moscow prostitutes alibi". The Independent. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Silver, Vernon; Pismennaya, Evgenia (July 13, 2017). "Trump's Two Nights of Parties in Moscow Echo Years Later". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on July 14, 2017. Retrieved March 3, 2018.
- ^ a b c Toobin, Jeffrey (February 19, 2018). "Trump's Miss Universe Gambit". The New Yorker. Retrieved October 17, 2023.
- ^ Raju, Manu; Herb, Jeremy (November 10, 2017). "Ex-Trump security chief testifies he rejected 2013 Russian offer of women for Trump in Moscow". CNN. Retrieved January 26, 2018.
- ^ a b Pismennaya, Evgenia; Kravchenko, Stepan; Baker, Stephanie (December 21, 2016). "The Day Trump Came to Moscow: Oligarchs, Miss Universe and Nobu". Bloomberg News. Retrieved August 7, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e Uygur, Cenk (April 24, 2018). "It's Real: Trump's Pee Tape Alibi IMMEDIATELY Debunked". YouTube. The Young Turks (official account). Retrieved January 31, 2024.
- ^ a b U. S. House Intelligence Committee (HIC) (November 7, 2017). "Interview of Keith Schiller" (PDF). House Intelligence Committee. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
- ^ a b Bash, Dana; Gray, Noah; Diamond, Jeremy (September 1, 2017). "Longtime Trump aide Keith Schiller tells people he intends to leave White House". CNN. Retrieved September 2, 2017.
- ^ a b Colvin, Jill (April 5, 2017). "Former bodyguard maintains role as top Trump protector". Associated Press. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
- ^ a b Karni, Annie (May 2, 2018). "Trump's fixers revolt". Politico. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f Abramson, Seth (January 17, 2017). "Allegations By Former Miss Hungary Contradict Trump Claims On Dossier". HuffPost. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
In May [2016, Sarka] told Hungarian talk-show host Kasza Tibor that during a pageant after-party Trump gave her his business card, private telephone number, and hotel room number. Sarka has since shared the business card—which she kept, though she never went to Mr. Trump's hotel room—with the media. The implication taken by Sarka at the time she received the card was that she was being propositioned for a romantic liaison with Trump, who was then married to current wife Melania.
- ^ a b c d Brown, Hayes (January 13, 2017). "A Hungarian Beauty Queen Said That Trump Invited Her To His Moscow Hotel Room". BuzzFeed News. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
- ^ Murray, Mark (April 20, 2018). "Did Trump stay overnight in Russia in 2013? Evidence points to yes". NBC News. Retrieved March 22, 2024.
Trump told Roberts and producer Kerrie Wudyka that he was leaving Moscow directly from the Miss Universe after party, and invited Roberts and her to fly back on his plane. Roberts and Wudyka declined the offer.
- ^ Smith, Allan (April 23, 2018). "Flight records obtained by Bloomberg shed new light on Trump's heavily scrutinized Moscow trip—and they seem to contradict what he told James Comey". Business Insider. Retrieved October 6, 2018.
- ^ a b Durham, John (May 12, 2023). "[Durham] Report on Matters Related to Intelligence Activities and Investigations Arising Out of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns" (PDF). Department of Justice. Retrieved May 15, 2023.
- ^ a b c Stanley-Becker, Isaac (November 6, 2021). "A spin doctor with ties to Russia allegedly fed the Steele dossier before fighting to discredit it". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 10, 2021.
- ^ a b Goldman, Adam; Savage, Charlie (November 4, 2021). "Authorities Arrest Analyst Who Contributed to Steele Dossier". The New York Times. Retrieved November 5, 2021. Cite error: The named reference "Goldman_Savage_11/4/2021" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e Aggeler, Madeleine (April 13, 2018). "James Comey Says It's 'Possible' Trump's Alleged Pee Tape Is Real". New York. Retrieved September 28, 2019.
- ^ a b Kirell, Andrew (April 24, 2018). "Miss Universe 2013 Host Thomas Roberts Confirms: Trump Stayed Overnight in Moscow". The Daily Beast. Retrieved April 26, 2018.
Roberts' retelling of those days in Moscow represents one of the first public contradictions of the timeline Trump offered Comey. While it does not necessarily prove the existence of a so-called pee tape, it does raise further questions as to why the president misled his one-time FBI director in the first place.
- ^ a b Bickerton, James (November 22, 2023). "One detail in Trump's "golden shower" denial raises questions". Newsweek. Retrieved December 25, 2023.
Trump said: "He was with four hookers. You think that was good to go up and tell my wife 'it's not true darling I love you very much—it's not true!' "Actually that one she didn't believe because she said 'he's a germaphobe he's not into that you know.' He's not into golden showers as they say they called it, he's not. I don't like that idea. No I thought that would be a big problem, I was going to have a rough night but that one she was very good on."
- ^ a b c d Horton, Adrian (October 19, 2021). "Colbert says new Superman motto got people angry – 'it's the American way'". The Guardian. Retrieved December 28, 2023.
- ^ a b Loofbourow, Lili (April 13, 2018). "Beyond the pee tape". The Week. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
What's really interesting about the encounter isn't whether the "pee tape" is real or not. It's how Trump reacted to the report of the pee tape. It's so weird. ... This is Comey's story about his experience with a volatile, ignorant bully who thought he could bury the truth by bullying the U.S. government into covering for him.
- ^ a b Gerdeman, Dina (December 5, 2016). "How The 2016 Presidential Candidates Misled Us With Truthful Statements". Harvard Business School. Retrieved January 28, 2024.
Paltering" is the active use of truthful statements to influence a target's beliefs by giving a false or distorted impression.
- ^ a b Hogenboom, Melissa (November 15, 2017). "The devious art of lying by telling the truth". BBC. Retrieved March 11, 2024.
- ^ a b c Rogers, Todd; Zeckhauser, Richard; Gino, Francesca (September 2014). "Artful Paltering: The Risks and Rewards of Using Truthful Statements to Mislead Others. RWP14-045" (PDF). Harvard Business School. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
For lies of omission to succeed, the deceiver neglects relevant information that would change a target's mistaken belief. For paltering to succeed, the deceiver not only neglects relevant information, but also fosters a mistaken belief in the target through the artful use of truthful statements.
- ^ a b c Baker, Stephanie (April 19, 2019). "Mueller's Take on Trump Tape Is Disputed by Georgian Businessman". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
- ^ a b Kircher, Madison Malone (April 18, 2019). "Sorry, Peelievers: The Only Trump Tapes in the Mueller Report Sound Fake". Intelligencer. Retrieved April 29, 2024.
- ^ a b c Robson, Ruthann (November 15, 2019). "Sexing the Mueller Report" (PDF). Stetson Law Review. Retrieved February 18, 2024.
- ^ Blake, Aaron (April 24, 2018). "Trump's denials that he stayed overnight in Russia are falling apart". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 19, 2024.
- ^ a b May, Charlie (April 24, 2018). "Donald Trump's Moscow trip alibi has a big hole". Salon. Retrieved April 18, 2024.
- ^ Brennan, Liam (April 24, 2018). "Donald Trump's Lies About the Amount of Time He Spent in Moscow Might Prove Obstruction". Slate Magazine. Retrieved April 18, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f Schreckinger, Ben (April 24, 2018). "Trump's false claims to Comey about Moscow stay could aid Robert Mueller". Politico. Retrieved April 18, 2024.
- ^ a b Levin, Bess (April 23, 2018). "Trump's Pee-Tape Alibi Is Falling Apart". Vanity Fair. Retrieved April 18, 2024.
- ^ a b c Dopp, Terrence (April 13, 2018). "Comey Says Trump Considered Ordering FBI to Disprove Dossier Prostitute Claim". Bloomberg News. Retrieved December 4, 2023.
- ^ a b c Pecorin, Allison (May 1, 2019). "10 best footnotes of the Mueller report". ABC News. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e Rucker, Philip (April 12, 2018). "James Comey's memoir: Trump fixates on proving lewd dossier allegations false". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
- ^ Malloy, Allie (April 26, 2018). "Trump denies that he told Comey he didn't stay overnight in Moscow". CNN. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
- ^ a b Lemire, Jonathan; Day, Chad (April 27, 2018). "Trump pledges hands off Russia probe, may "change my mind'". Associated Press. Retrieved May 10, 2021.
- ^ Ngyen, Tina (April 20, 2018). "Donald Trump Is Obsessed with the Pee Tape". Vanity Fair. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
- ^ a b c Levitz, Eric (April 12, 2018). "Comey: Trump Asked Me to Investigate 'Pee Tape' to Prove It Didn't Exist". Intelligencer. Retrieved September 28, 2019.
- ^ Collinson, Stephen (April 13, 2018). "Comey paints unsparing portrait of Trump in devastating tell-all book". CNN. Retrieved January 29, 2024.
- ^ Stracqualursi, Veronica (April 13, 2018). "Comey: 'I don't know' if Trump was with prostitutes in Moscow". CNN. Retrieved April 15, 2018.
- ^ a b Oliver, David (January 11, 2017). "Trump on Allegations: I'm a 'Germaphobe'". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved May 13, 2021.
- ^ Leonnig, Carol D.; Miller, Greg (November 3, 2017). "Longtime Trump bodyguard to face questions about 2013 Moscow trip". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 15, 2024.
- ^ Santus, Rex (April 12, 2018). "Comey says Trump asked him to look into the "pee tape" for Melania's sake". Vice. Retrieved January 28, 2024.
- ^ Francis, David; Groll, Elias (January 25, 2017). "Comey: Trump Denied He Was Involved With 'Hookers' in Russia". Foreign Policy. Retrieved January 25, 2018.
- ^ Bump, Philip (August 28, 2017). "Trump's long history of seeking a politically inconvenient business deal in Russia". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 27, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e Strzok, Peter (2020). Compromised: Counterintelligence and the Threat of Donald J. Trump. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 978-0-358-23706-8.
- ^ Dale, Daniel (January 16, 2021). "Analysis: The 15 most notable lies of Donald Trump's presidency". CNN. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
- ^ a b c Sheets, Megan (December 18, 2023). "Melania Trump's response to 'golden shower' claims – according to her husband". The Independent. Retrieved December 19, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Savage, Dan (April 13, 2018). "The Pee Tape Is Real*". The Stranger. Retrieved December 22, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Smith, Ryan (November 24, 2023). "Seth Meyers mocks Donald Trump golden shower story". Newsweek. Retrieved December 28, 2023.
- ^ Bump, Philip (April 26, 2018). "Analysis: When you are and aren't legally allowed to lie to the FBI". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 9, 2021.
- ^ Dawsey, Josh; Scherer, Michael (October 14, 2021). "Trump asserts his dominance inside GOP, pushing Republicans to embrace his false claims of fraud". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 4, 2023.
- ^ Marcus, Josh (November 8, 2022). "Trump reveals Melania's candid reaction to 'golden shower' claim in Steele dossier". The Independent. Retrieved December 19, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Santos, Brian De Los (March 16, 2018). "Donald Trump's 'pee tape' controversy, explained". Mashable. Retrieved December 29, 2023.
And thus, the pee tape was born.
- ^ a b c d Siddique, Haroon (October 16, 2023). "Trump aims to sue London firm over dossier alleging sexual perversions". The Guardian. Retrieved December 28, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e Knaut, Gretchen; Eisen, Norman L.; Carrier, McKenzie; Heidt, Vicka; Phea, Greg; Gee, Madison (May 24, 2023). "Detailed Chronology in Trump-Cohen Hush Money Investigation". Just Security. Retrieved November 29, 2023.
- ^ a b Trout, Robert P; Solomon, Gloria B (August 15, 2019). "Hope Hicks Response to Chair Nadler and House Judiciary Committee" (PDF). Retrieved January 15, 2024.
- ^ Carr, Howie (May 21, 2023). "Howie Carr: Durham Report says origin of the pee-tape hoax in the Steele Dossier is proud UMass grad Charles Dolan". Boston Herald. Retrieved February 20, 2024.
- ^ Karet, Brendan (March 19, 2019). "Sean Hannity suggests people didn't vote for Trump because "pee tape" rumors. The Steele dossier wasn't released until months after the election". Media Matters for America. Retrieved December 27, 2023.
- ^ Merica, Dan (April 16, 2017). "Meet the 'most underestimated person on Trump's team'". CNN. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
- ^ a b c Melley, Brian (October 16, 2023). "Trump sues ex-British spy over dossier containing 'shocking and scandalous claims'". Associated Press. Retrieved December 28, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l U. S. House Judiciary Committee (HJC) (June 19, 2019). "Interview of Hope Hicks" (PDF). House Judiciary Committee. Retrieved December 20, 2023.
- ^ Bustillo, Ximena (May 2, 2024). "Who is Keith Davidson, the lawyer who negotiated hush money payments from Trump?". NPR. Retrieved May 3, 2024.
- ^ Scannell, Kara; Del Valle, Lauren; Herb, Jeremy; Collins, Kaitlan (April 30, 2024). "Ex-attorney for Daniels and McDougal testifies in Trump trial". CNN. Retrieved May 3, 2024.
- ^ a b Bruggeman, Lucien (April 6, 2023). "Inside the 3 so-called 'catch and kill' payments in Trump's indictment". ABC News. Retrieved March 19, 2024.
- ^ Novak, Matt (January 11, 2017). "Penthouse Offers $1 Million For a Trump Piss Tape". Gizmodo. Retrieved December 13, 2023.
- ^ a b Nussbaum, Matthew (March 3, 2017). "The definitive Trump-Russia timeline of events". Politico. Retrieved August 6, 2024.
- ^ Contorno, Steve (May 15, 2024). "Trump's playboy past is in the spotlight". CNN. Retrieved July 11, 2024.
- ^ Jordan, Mary (May 9, 2016). "From playboy to president? Trump's past crude sex talk collides with his White House bid". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 11, 2024.
- ^ Tabachnik, Sam (May 10, 2016). "Today in 10: Pitfalls of Trump's playboy past, an escalating bathroom fight, Steph Curry's next honor". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 11, 2024.
- ^ Fegley, Richard, & Wayda, Stephen (photographers). "Playmate of the Year: Karen McDougal takes a bow", Playboy, vol. 45, issue 7, p. 130-141, July 1998.
- ^ a b Watkins, Eli (March 22, 2018). "Karen McDougal tells CNN Trump once tried to pay her after sex". CNN. Retrieved January 29, 2024.
- ^ a b Kosoff, Maya (February 16, 2018). "What the Trump-McDougal Story Reveals About the Steele Dossier". Vanity Fair. Retrieved January 29, 2024.
- ^ Corn, David (July 10, 2017). "How a music publicist connected Trump's inner circle to a Russian lawyer peddling Clinton dirt". Mother Jones. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
- ^ a b c Kramer, Andrew E. (July 17, 2017). "The Master of 'Kompromat' Believed to Be Behind Trump Jr.'s Meeting". The New York Times. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
- ^ Bump, Philip (August 22, 2018). "On three separate issues, what Trump knew and when emerges as critical". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 12, 2024.
- ^ Meredith, Sam (February 27, 2019). "Read Michael Cohen's opening statement here". CNBC. Retrieved March 3, 2019.
- ^ Sheth, Sonam (March 14, 2018). "House Intelligence Democrats want to question the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow about the most salacious allegation in the Trump-Russia dossier". Business Insider. Retrieved April 11, 2020.
- ^ Shane, Scott (October 30, 2017). "Trump Campaign Got Early Word Russia Had Democrats' Emails". The New York Times. Retrieved December 16, 2022.
- ^ LaFraniere, Sharon; Mazzetti, Mark; Apuzzo, Matt (December 30, 2017). "How the Russia Inquiry Began: A Campaign Aide, Drinks and Talk of Political Dirt". The New York Times. Retrieved January 21, 2018.
- ^ Todd, Chuck; Murray, Mark; Dann, Carrie (January 2, 2018). "The evidence isn't on Trump's side in 'collusion' war of words". NBC News. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- ^ a b c d Levintova, Hannah (June 26, 2018). "The Russian pop star behind the Trump Tower meeting has a new music video trolling America". Mother Jones. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
- ^ Tillett, Emily (July 27, 2017). "Trump Jr.'s meeting with Russian lawyer was about sanctions, financier tells Senate panel". CBS News. Retrieved July 27, 2017.
- ^ Cohen, Marshall (November 17, 2019). "37 times Trump was soft on Russia". CNN. Retrieved December 29, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g Rubin, Jennifer (November 30, 2018). "Was Trump compromised? Is he still?". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 29, 2023.
- ^ Sheth, Sonam (August 14, 2020). "Michael Cohen teases details about Trump and 'golden showers in a sex club' in upcoming book". Business Insider. Retrieved March 19, 2024.
Emin Agalarov ... released a music video in 2018 trolling Trump over the allegation.
- ^ Pilipenko, Diana; Dessel, Talia (December 17, 2018). "Following the Money: Trump and Russia-Linked Transactions From the Campaign to the Presidential Inauguration". Center for American Progress. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
- ^ Santos, Nina dos (February 21, 2019). "Senate investigators pursue Moscow-based former Trump associate". CNN. Retrieved December 31, 2023.
- ^ Harding, Luke; Borger, Julian (August 18, 2020). "US Senate report goes beyond Mueller to lay bare Trump campaign's Russia links". The Guardian. Retrieved December 21, 2023.
- ^ a b Blum, Howard (March 30, 2017). "How Ex-Spy Christopher Steele Compiled His Explosive Trump-Russia Dossier". Vanity Fair. Retrieved December 24, 2017.
- ^ a b c d Withnall, Adam; Sengupta, Kim (January 12, 2017). "The 10 key Donald Trump allegations from the classified Russia memos". The Independent. Retrieved December 29, 2017. Cite error: The named reference "Withnall_Sengupta_1/12/2017" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b Zappone, Chris (January 11, 2017). "Russia planned to cultivate and compromise Donald Trump, according to leaked memos". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved February 27, 2018.
- ^ "Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal information about Donald Trump". The New Zealand Herald. January 11, 2017. Retrieved February 27, 2018.
- ^ a b Bertrand, Natasha (January 10, 2017). "Trump briefed on unverified claims that Russian operatives have compromising information on him". Business Insider. Retrieved February 26, 2018.
- ^ NPR (November 21, 2017). "Journalist Investigating Trump And Russia Says 'Full Picture Is One Of Collusion'". NPR. Retrieved February 17, 2018.
- ^ LeTourneau, Nancy (February 17, 2017). "Trump is configuring a dangerous web of foreign interests". Washington Monthly. Retrieved February 17, 2018.
- ^ Bertrand, Natasha (November 6, 2017). "Carter Page's testimony is filled with bombshells—and supports key portions of the Steele dossier". Business Insider. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
- ^ Weindling, Jacob (January 11, 2017). "The 31 Most Explosive Allegations against Trump from the Leaked Intelligence Document". Paste. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
- ^ Bertrand, Natasha (January 27, 2017). "Memos: CEO of Russia's state oil company offered Trump adviser, allies a cut of huge deal if sanctions were lifted". Business Insider. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
- ^ Tracy, Abigail (November 7, 2017). "Is Carter Page Digging the Trump Administration's Grave? Three things the former campaign adviser revealed to Congress that should scare the White House". Vanity Fair. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
- ^ Harding, Luke (February 3, 2018). "Why Carter Page Was Worth Watching". Politico. Retrieved November 30, 2019.
- ^ a b Herb, Jeremy (August 31, 2018). "Ohr says Steele told him Russian intel believed they had Trump 'over a barrel'". CNN. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Smith, David (January 29, 2021). "'The perfect target': Russia cultivated Trump as asset for 40 years – ex-KGB spy". The Guardian. Retrieved September 28, 2022.
- ^ a b "Book Yuri Shvets for Speaking, Events and Appearances". APB Speakers. July 13, 2018. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
- ^ a b Times of Israel Staff (January 29, 2021). "KGB groomed Trump as an asset for 40 years, former Russian spy says". The Times of Israel. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
- ^ Cunliffe, Kyle (June 8, 2023). "Donald Trump spying allegations: more likely useful idiot than Putin's agent". The Conversation. Retrieved February 13, 2024.
- ^ Grocott, Jeffrey (February 8, 2019). "Trump's Moscow Trip in the '90s Had Another Luminary: Apollo's Leon Black". NDTV BQ Prime. Archived from the original on August 7, 2024. Retrieved August 7, 2024.
- ^ Cohan, William D. (September 3, 2020). "What Was Leon Black Doing With Trump in Russia?". Vanity Fair. Retrieved August 7, 2024.
- ^ a b Pasha-Robinson, Lucy (September 5, 2017). "Russian politician says they should 'release the Kompromat' they have on Trump". The Independent. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ Watson, Kathryn (September 2, 2017). "Russian diplomats vacate 3 compounds in U.S., State Department says". CBS News. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ Lozada, Carlos (September 5, 2020). "Review - He investigated Clinton and Trump. Then the Justice Department turned on him". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 8, 2023.
- ^ Hirsh, Michael (December 21, 2018). "How Russian Money Helped Save Trump's Business". Foreign Policy. Retrieved February 13, 2024.
- ^ Chait, Jonathan (July 25, 2019). "Mueller Testifies Russia Had Blackmail on Trump". Intelligencer. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
- ^ Kelly, Meg (December 3, 2018). "The president's misleading statements on Trump Tower Moscow: A timeline". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
- ^ PBS (February 27, 2019). "WATCH: Trump 'knew of and directed' negotiations for Trump Tower in Moscow, Cohen testifies". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
- ^ Farrell, Greg (November 30, 2018). "Cohen's Plea Suggests Russians Held 'Kompromat' on Trump". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
- ^ Drum, Kevin (January 12, 2017). "BBC's Paul Wood: There are four sources for claims of possible Trump–Russia blackmail". Mother Jones. Retrieved April 1, 2018.
- ^ a b Boot, Max (January 13, 2019). "Here are 18 reasons Trump could be a Russian asset". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
- ^ Boot, Max (August 1, 2020). "More evidence of Trump's subservience to Putin - and we still don't know why". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 3, 2020.
- ^ a b Schindler, John R. (December 19, 2017). "Jim Clapper Just Nuked the Trump Presidency". The Observer. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
- ^ Sheth, Sonam (August 27, 2019). "Russia came out the winner of this year's G7 summit, and Trump looked like 'Putin's puppet'". Business Insider. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
- ^ Sevastopulo, Demetri; Hille, Kathrin (July 20, 2018). "Trump-Putin: Will Helsinki prove a turning point for the Republicans?". Financial Times. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
- ^ Mackey, Robert (July 16, 2018). "Trump and Putin Met in Helsinki's Hall of Mirrors. Here Are the Highlights". The Intercept. Retrieved November 11, 2019.
- ^ Willis, Jay (July 16, 2018). "Vladimir Putin Had a Strange Answer When Asked About the Pee Tape". GQ. Retrieved December 1, 2023.
- ^ Blake, Aaron (July 17, 2018). "The growing Trump-Putin kompromat question". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 11, 2019.
- ^ Bertrand, Natasha (September 30, 2019). "The Russia Hawk in the White House". Politico. Retrieved November 11, 2019.
- ^ Borger, Julian (May 23, 2017). "Ex-CIA chief: Trump staff had enough contact with Russia to justify FBI inquiry". The Guardian. Retrieved April 25, 2018.
- ^ DeBonis, Mike; Kim, Seung Min (October 17, 2019). "'All roads lead to Putin': Pelosi questions Trump's loyalty in White House clash". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
- ^ Morell, Michael J. (August 5, 2016). "I Ran the C.I.A. Now I'm Endorsing Hillary Clinton". The New York Times. Retrieved December 16, 2023.
- ^ Sipher, John (April 16, 2019). "Is Trump a Russian Agent?: Explaining Terms of Art and Examining the Facts". Just Security. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
- ^ Bergman, Ronen (January 12, 2017). "US intel sources warn Israel against sharing secrets with Trump administration". Ynetnews. Retrieved April 1, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f "ORDER: United States of America v. Igor Y. Danchenko, Case No. 1:21-cr-245-AJT-1" (PDF). United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 4, 2022.
- ^ a b c Isikoff, Michael (September 23, 2016). "U.S. intel officials probe ties between Trump adviser and Kremlin". Yahoo! News. Retrieved November 24, 2019.
- ^ a b c Corn, David (October 31, 2016). "A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump". Mother Jones. Retrieved December 24, 2017.
- ^ a b Shane, Scott; Confessore, Nicholas; Rosenberg, Matthew (January 12, 2017). "How a Sensational, Unverified Dossier Became a Crisis for Donald Trump". The New York Times. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
- ^ Borger, Julian (January 12, 2017). "How the Trump dossier came to light: secret sources, a retired spy and John McCain". The Guardian. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
- ^ a b Levine, Mike (September 18, 2018). "Trump 'dossier' stuck in New York, didn't trigger Russia investigation, sources say". ABC News. Retrieved January 13, 2019.
- ^ a b c Office of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice (December 9, 2019). "Inspector General report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation" (PDF). Department of Justice. Retrieved December 9, 2019.
- ^ a b c Edwards, Jim (January 11, 2017). "Timeline: That Russian Trump blackmail dossier has been making the rounds for months—here is how it finally came to light". Business Insider. Retrieved April 7, 2018.
- ^ a b Borger, Julian (January 11, 2017). "John McCain passes dossier alleging secret Trump–Russia contacts to FBI". The Guardian. Retrieved February 26, 2018.
- ^ Sengupta, Kim (January 12, 2017). "Former British ambassador played key role in leaked Trump documents". The Independent. Retrieved April 7, 2018.
- ^ Borger, Julian (April 28, 2017). "UK was given details of alleged contacts between Trump campaign and Moscow". The Guardian. Retrieved December 26, 2017.
- ^ a b Isikoff, Michael; Corn, David (2018). Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump. Grand Central Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5387-2874-1.
Obama turned to Rice and said, 'Why am I hearing this?' He was incredulous. 'What's happening?' he asked. Rice said the intelligence community had no idea if this story was true but that Obama needed to be aware the allegation was circulating. 'You don't really expect to hear the term 'golden showers' in the President Daily Brief,' a participant in this meeting later said, 'or that the guy who is going to become president may be a Manchurian candidate.'
- ^ a b Hensch, Mark (January 12, 2017). "Biden: Intel officials warned us of Trump dossier". The Hill. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
- ^ a b c Simpson, Glenn; Fritsch, Peter (2019). Crime in Progress: Inside the Steele Dossier and the Fusion GPS Investigation of Donald Trump. Random House. ISBN 978-0-593-13416-0.
- ^ a b c d "President Donald J. Trump -V- Orbis Business Intelligence Limited, Case No. KB-2022-004403" (PDF). Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London. February 1, 2024. Retrieved May 16, 2024.
- ^ a b c d Kosoff, Maya (July 20, 2017). "Trump Thinks Comey Was Trying to Blackmail Him". Vanity Fair. Retrieved April 7, 2018.
- ^ a b Vogel, Kenneth P. (October 25, 2017). "The Trump Dossier: What We Know and Who Paid for It". The New York Times. Retrieved April 27, 2024.
- ^ a b Chaggaris, Steve (October 25, 2017). "Hillary Clinton learned of Trump dossier after BuzzFeed posted it". CBS News. Retrieved April 27, 2024.
- ^ Baker, Stephanie; Bedwell, Helena (April 24, 2019). "Georgian Businessman Offers More Texts With Cohen to Rebut Mueller Footnote". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 21, 2024.
- ^ a b c d Baker, Stephanie; Dolmetsch, Chris (June 17, 2020). "Mueller Accused of Defaming Man in Special Counsel Report". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 20, 2024.
- ^ Orden, Erica (April 18, 2019). "Mueller investigated rumored compromising tapes of Trump in Moscow". CNN. Retrieved January 12, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f "Rtskhiladze v. Mueller, Complaint, 1:20-cv-01591-CRC" (PDF). United States District Court for the District of Columbia. June 17, 2020.
- ^ Beale, Lauren (February 24, 2015). "Exclusive details: Harvey Levin of TMZ hunts for a renter". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
- ^ Goldman, Adam; Savage, Charlie (July 25, 2020). "The F.B.I. Pledged to Keep a Source Anonymous. Trump Allies Aided His Unmasking". The New York Times. Retrieved July 26, 2020.
- ^ a b Rizzo, Salvador (October 14, 2022). "Durham says Steele dossier source lied. But the FBI long valued him". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 17, 2022.
- ^ Parker, Ashley (May 3, 2024). "Hope Hicks witnessed nearly every Trump scandal. Now she must testify". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 16, 2024.
- ^ Relman, Eliza (January 12, 2018). "Steve Bannon suggests Trump's lawyer 'took care' of 'a hundred' women during the presidential campaign". Business Insider. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ a b c Chan, Tara Francis (April 16, 2018). "'Be very careful:' Comey was the first person to tell Trump about the Steele dossier before the inauguration—he couldn't have been more nervous". Business Insider. Retrieved April 19, 2018.
- ^ Manne, Robert (February 20, 2017). "Decoding Trump and the Russians". La Trobe University. Retrieved December 15, 2023.
Originally published] on February 18, 2017, by The Australian.
- ^ Nowicki, Dan (January 13, 2017). "John McCain intrigue grows in Donald Trump dossier affair". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
- ^ "Biden: Obama and I were told about Trump dossier ahead of leaks". AOL. January 12, 2017. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
- ^ Wemple, Erik (January 10, 2017). "BuzzFeed's ridiculous rationale for publishing the Trump–Russia dossier". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
- ^ Sutton, Kelsey (January 11, 2017). "Trump calls CNN 'fake news', as channel defends its reporting on intelligence briefing". Politico. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
- ^ Borger, Julian (October 7, 2017). "The Trump–Russia dossier: why its findings grow more significant by the day". The Guardian. Retrieved December 28, 2017.
- ^ Mayer, Jane (November 25, 2019). "The Inside Story of Christopher Steele's Trump Dossier". The New Yorker. Retrieved November 27, 2019.
- ^ Burleigh, Nina (December 18, 2019). "Fusion GPS' Glenn Simpson on the Steele Dossier, the FBI's Trump Investigation and Life as a Fox News Pinata". Newsweek. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ Corn, David (November 19, 2021). "The Steele Dossier and Donald Trump's Betrayal of America". Mother Jones. Retrieved November 20, 2021.
- ^ a b c Goldberg, Michelle (April 16, 2018). "Lordy, Is There a Tape?". The New York Times. Retrieved December 22, 2023.
- ^ Borger, Julian (November 15, 2017). "Christopher Steele believes his dossier on Trump–Russia is 70–90% accurate". The Guardian. Retrieved January 22, 2018.
- ^ Mei, Gina (January 11, 2017). "Twitter Responds to That Unsubstantiated Trump Report With a Stream of Pee Puns". Cosmopolitan. Retrieved May 4, 2024.
- ^ Frank, T.A. (January 11, 2017). "The Alleged Trump-Putin "Golden Shower" Fiasco, Explained". Vanity Fair. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
- ^ a b c Meyers, Seth (April 12, 2018). "Pee Tape Allegations; Paul Ryan Retires; Trump Attacks Mueller: A Closer Look". YouTube. Late Night with Seth Meyers (official account). Retrieved January 31, 2024.
- ^ a b Pakman, David (April 24, 2018). "UH-OH: Trump Tells First "Pee Tape" Lie". YouTube. The David Pakman Show (official account). Retrieved January 31, 2024.
- ^ a b c d Bradley, Laura (January 12, 2017). "After Trump Dossier Leaks, Pee Jokes Are the No. 1 Story on Late Night". Vanity Fair. Retrieved December 21, 2023.
- ^ a b c d McHenry, Jackson (June 19, 2018). "How The Good Fight Brought the Trump Era to TV, From the Pee Tape to #MeToo". Vulture. Retrieved December 21, 2023.
- ^ a b Abad-Santos, Alex (January 15, 2017). "SNL showers Donald Trump with a toilet humor-themed press conference". Vox. Retrieved December 21, 2023.
- ^ a b Owen, Phil (April 15, 2018). "'SNL' Weekend Update's Michael Che Jokes that Trump 'Being Into Pee Pee Is Kind of Charming' (Video)". TheWrap. Retrieved December 21, 2023.
- ^ a b Fallon, Kevin (April 30, 2018). "'The Good Fight' Imagines a Trump 'Pee Tape' as Impeachment Heads to Network TV". The Daily Beast. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
- ^ Gilmer, Marcus (January 10, 2017). "Twitter strikes comedy gold with stream of jokes over Trump report". Mashable. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- ^ Bee, Samantha (January 11, 2017). "People Are Saying: Trump Likes Pee". YouTube. Full Frontal with Samantha Bee (official account). Retrieved January 31, 2024.
- ^ O'Brien, Conan (April 19, 2018). "Tony The Cameraman Has Seen The Pee Tape". YouTube. Conan (talk show) (official account). Retrieved May 14, 2024.
- ^ Corden, James (January 12, 2017). "A Monologue with Soft Sensuality". YouTube. The Late Late Show with James Corden (official account). Retrieved January 31, 2024.
- ^ Seder, Sam (July 16, 2018). "Did Putin Just Confirm That The Pee Tape Is Real?". YouTube. The Majority Report with Sam Seder (official account). Retrieved May 14, 2024.
- ^ Colbert, Stephen (October 18, 2021). "Melania Doesn't Believe In The "Pee Pee Tape," And Is Stephen The Real Superman?". YouTube. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert (official account). Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- ^ a b Boucher, Ashley (July 21, 2017). "Stephen Colbert Visits Trump's Infamous 'Pee-Pee Tape' Hotel Room During Russia Visit". TheWrap. Retrieved November 25, 2023.
- ^ Bendix, Trish (October 19, 2021). "Stephen Colbert Can't Take Christopher Steele's Purported Tape". The New York Times. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- ^ "Stephen Colbert Rents Trump's "Pee Pee Tape" Hotel Room in Russia". Mother Jones. July 21, 2017. Retrieved December 25, 2023.
- ^ Nemtsova, Anna (July 30, 2017). "The Untold Tale of Colbert's Hunt for Trump 'Pee Tape'". The Daily Beast. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- ^ Moraes, Lisa de (April 18, 2018). "James Comey Delivers Stephen Colbert's Third Biggest 'Late Show' Ratings Ever". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved December 27, 2023.
- ^ a b Kalmbacher, Colin (June 17, 2020). "Robert Mueller Sued for Defamation Over Footnote That Hinted at Infamous Golden Shower Footage". Law & Crime. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
- ^ Rtskhiladze v. Mueller, 20-cv-1591 (CRC) (Court case). Casetext. September 1, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2022.
- ^ a b c Casciani, Dominic (October 16, 2023). "Trump seeks 'vindication' in UK courts over ex-spy's dossier on alleged Russian sex bribes". BBC. Retrieved February 1, 2024.
- ^ Lawless, Jill (February 1, 2024). "UK judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit over dossier containing 'shocking and scandalous claims'". Associated Press. Retrieved February 1, 2024.
- ^ Gordon, Anna (February 1, 2024). "U.K. Judge Throws Out Trump Lawsuit Over Ex-Spy's Dossier". Time. Retrieved February 1, 2024.
- ^ a b Melley, Brian (March 7, 2024). "Trump is ordered to pay legal fees after failed lawsuit over the Steele dossier". Associated Press. Retrieved March 9, 2024.
- ^ Boffey, Daniel (February 1, 2024). "Donald Trump's 'sex and bribes' data protection case rejected by UK court". The Guardian. Retrieved February 1, 2024.
- ^ Uebelacker, Erik (February 1, 2024). "London judge tosses Trump's 'Steele dossier' lawsuit". Courthouse News Service. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
- ^ Iyer, Kaanita (March 30, 2024). "UK judge denies Trump's appeal in suit related to Steel dossier". CNN. Retrieved March 30, 2024.
- ^ a b "INDICTMENT. United States of America v. Igor Y. Danchenko, Case No. 1:21-cr-245-AJT-1". United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. November 3, 2021.
- ^ a b Weiner, Rachel (November 10, 2021). "Igor Danchenko pleads not guilty to lying to FBI about Steele dossier". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 14, 2021.
- ^ McCarthy, Andrew C. (December 11, 2021). "John Durham Probe: Michael Sussmann Case Collapsing?". National Review. Retrieved December 13, 2021.
[T]he exuberance over Durham's indictments of Sussmann and Danchenko, particularly among Trump supporters, was, if not irrational, then exaggerated. ... Durham may well be convinced that the Trump–Russia narrative was a hoax and that the Alfa Bank angle was similarly bogus, ... [but] His indictments, however, make no such claim. Instead, they narrowly allege that the defendants lied to the FBI only about the identity or status of people from whom they were getting information, not about the information itself. It is therefore irrelevant to Durham's prosecutions whether the Trump–Russia narrative was true or false. (italics original)
- ^ a b Savage, Charlie; Qiu, Linda (October 18, 2022). "Acquittal of Russia Analyst Deals Final Blow to Trump-Era Prosecutor". The New York Times. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
- ^ Rizzo, Salvador (October 18, 2022). "Steele dossier source acquitted, in loss for special counsel Durham". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 18, 2022.
- ^ Mendick, Robert; Fisher, Lucy (May 3, 2021). "MI6 spy Christopher Steele 'produced second dossier on Donald Trump for FBI'". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved May 5, 2021.
- ^ Miller, Justin; Kirell, Andrew (February 27, 2019). "Cohen Dismisses Trump Rumors About Prague, Elevator Tape, Abortions, and More". The Daily Beast. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
- ^ Wagner, Meg; Rocha, Veronica; Wills, Amanda (February 27, 2019). "Michael Cohen testifies before Congress". CNN. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
- ^ Bradley, Laura (December 28, 2018). "The Ongoing Mystery of the Alleged Trump Apprentice Tapes Gets Murkier". Vanity Fair. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
- ^ Robb, David; Busch, Anita (October 22, 2018). "Viceland's 'Trump Tapes' Is Over, But Tom Arnold's Hunt Isn't". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
Further reading
[edit]Articles
[edit]- Davidson, Adam (July 19, 2018). "A Theory of Trump Kompromat". The New Yorker.
Books
[edit]- Comey, James (2018). A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership. Flatiron Books. ISBN 978-1-250-19245-5.
- Harding, Luke (2017). Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win. Random House. ISBN 978-0-525-52093-1.
- Hettena, Seth (2018). Trump/Russia: A Definitive History. Melville House. ISBN 978-1-612-19739-5.
- Isikoff, Michael; Corn, David (2018). Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump. Grand Central Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5387-2874-1.
- Nance, Malcolm (2019). The Plot to Betray America: How Team Trump Embraced Our Enemies, Compromised Our Security, and How We Can Fix It. Hachette. ISBN 978-0-316-53576-2.
- Simpson, Glenn; Fritsch, Peter (2019). Crime in Progress: Inside the Steele Dossier and the Fusion GPS Investigation of Donald Trump. Random House. ISBN 978-0-593-13416-0.
- Strzok, Peter (2020). Compromised: Counterintelligence and the Threat of Donald J. Trump. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 978-0-358-23706-8.
Government sources
[edit]- "Mueller Report: Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election. Volumes I and II". Department of Justice. March 2019.[1]
- "Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russian interference in the 2016 United States presidential election, Volume 5: Counterintelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities" (PDF). Senate Intelligence Committee. August 18, 2020.[2]
- "Inspector General report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation" (PDF). Department of Justice. December 9, 2019.[3]
- "[Durham] Report on Matters Related to Intelligence Activities and Investigations Arising Out of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns" (PDF). Department of Justice. May 12, 2023.[4]
- "INDICTMENT. United States of America v. Igor Y. Danchenko, Case No. 1:21-cr-245-AJT-1". United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. November 3, 2021.[5]
- "ORDER: United States of America v. Igor Y. Danchenko, Case No. 1:21-cr-245-AJT-1" (PDF). United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 4, 2022.[6]
- "Rtskhiladze v. Mueller, Complaint, 1:20-cv-01591-CRC" (PDF). United States District Court for the District of Columbia. June 17, 2020.[7]
- "Rtskhiladze v. Mueller, Opinion, 20-cv-1591 (CRC)". United States District Court for the District of Columbia. September 1, 2021.[8]
- "President Donald J. Trump -V- Orbis Business Intelligence Limited, Case No. KB-2022-004403" (PDF). Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London. February 1, 2024.[9]
- "Deposition of Michael Cohen, Part 2" (PDF). House Intelligence Committee. March 6, 2019. pp. 225–229, 235–236, 254.[10]
- "Interview of Keith Schiller" (PDF). House Intelligence Committee. November 7, 2017.[11]
- "Interview of Hope Hicks" (PDF). House Judiciary Committee. June 19, 2019.[12]
TV interviews
[edit]- Shear, Michael D. (April 16, 2018). "James Comey's Interview on ABC's '20/20': Annotated Excerpts". The New York Times. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
- Comey, James; Stephanopoulos, George (April 15, 2018). "Transcript: James Comey's '20/20' interview with ABC News chief anchor George Stephanopoulos". ABC News. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
- Video: Comey, James; Stephanopoulos, George (April 15, 2018). "James Comey Interview with George Stephanopoulos, Part 1: Telling Trump about the 'dossier' (8:32 min.)". YouTube. ABC News (official account). Retrieved January 30, 2024.
- Video: Comey, James; Stephanopoulos, George (April 15, 2018). "James Comey Interview with George Stephanopoulos, Comey says Trump asked him to investigate 'dossier' (6:45 min.)". YouTube. ABC News (official account). Retrieved January 30, 2024.
- Video: Comey, James; Remnick, David J. (April 23, 2018). "James Comey on His Infamous Dinner with Trump and the Steele Dossier (13:04 min.)". YouTube. The New Yorker (official account). Retrieved January 30, 2024.
References
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Mueller_report
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
SICv5_8/18/2020
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
OIG_12/9/2019
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Durham_5/12/2023
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
indictment_11/3/2021
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
USvDanchenko_10/4/2022
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
RvM_6/17/2020
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
RvM_9/1/2021
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
TrumpvOrbis_2/1/2024
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
HIC_3/6/2019
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
HIC_11/7/2017
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
HJC_6/19/2019
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
External links
[edit]* {{cite news | last1=Bensinger | first1=Ken | last2=Elder | first2=Miriam | last3=Schoofs | first3=Mark | title=These Reports Allege Trump Has Deep Ties To Russia | agency=[[BuzzFeed News]] | date=January 10, 2017 | url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kenbensinger/these-reports-allege-trump-has-deep-ties-to-russia}}
Categories
[edit]{{DEFAULTSORT:Trump, Donald}} {{Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections}} {{Russia–United States relations}} [[Category:Donald Trump controversies|Sexual misconduct allegations]] [[Category:Espionage scandals and incidents]] [[Category:Federal political sex scandals in the United States]] [[Category:Mass media-related controversies in the United States]] [[Category:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections]] [[Category:Russia–United States relations]] [[Category:Trump administration controversies|Sexual misconduct allegations]] [[Category:2017 controversies in the United States]]
Bottom and notes
[edit]- TO DO
- Make redirects: #GoldenShowers, #PeeTape, and #PEEOTUS
- Remove this from above when this draft is finished: Trump pee tape, an allegation from the 2016 Steele Dossier
- Use this .{{spaces}}... code where necessary: "To be read.{{spaces}}... Think"