User talk:Artem S. Tashkinov

Consistency in CPU listing tables

Hi Artem S. Tashkinov,

This message is in addition to the important update email I have sent you. I think I have noticed you removing "Common features:" from the Cannon Lake article where it listed only one SKU. I am fine with that, but I'll explain that the reason for why I wrote it like that, is, consistency between various different CPU product listings. You see, my goal was to achieve a uniform look across those listing tables. So even if there's only one model, it says "Common features" much like how the other CPU series listings are presented. Hope that makes sense to you. But, I'll be leaving all this up to you from now on, as like I said in that email, I don't have the time to discuss and decide on sweeping changes these days anymore.

P.S.: this is what the Ryzen 8000G series APUs listing template looked like when I created it, I don't quite like how it looks now with all the extra columns added to the table. The Zen 4 + Zen 4c cores were already indicated in the "core config" column, where you can see in the footnote if it says "n + n", then that's Zen 4 and Zen 4c cores respectively. Also, Ryzen 8040 series mobile processors listing template then and now.

I usually only add columns to a table if there's a major architectural feature addition and the info varies across the models (e.g. E-cores on intel CPUs, the NPU).

That's all from me at this time.

Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought about the wording and it sounded redundant for a single CPU in the lineup. I've reverted the change anyways. It now looks kinda awkward but I didn't mean want to upset you or alter anything. @AP 499D25 Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 17:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The change was okay, I wasn't requesting a revert, just writing down why it was there (and noting edits to other tables breaking consistency while at it). — AP 499D25 (talk) 12:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of On the Edge (Andy Duguid album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On the Edge (Andy Duguid album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the Edge (Andy Duguid album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 23:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Andy Duguid - On The Edge (album cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andy Duguid - On The Edge (album cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]