User talk:بلال طاہر

Welcome!

Hello, Bilal190023, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! David Biddulph (talk) 10:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:ABDUR189949

Could you please explain your relationship with the account User:ABDUR189949, and why you have been editing that editor's user page? If it was you that created that other account, you need to read about sock puppetry. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:28, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Government Rafi-ul-Islam High School Malakwal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Government Rafi-ul-Islam High School Malakwal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Government Rafi-ul-Islam High School Malakwal (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references at all - requires significant coverage in independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Government Rafi-ul-Islam High School Malakwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Government Rafi-ul-Islam High School Malakwal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bilal190023! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to your more recent edits to the draft, you need to follow the links which you have been given, particularly to WP:Reliable sources, WP:Verifiability, WP:Referencing for beginners, and Wikipedia:Citing sources. You have added a number of self-published sources (though not as inline citations) but they are of no value in demonstrating notability of the subject. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Government Rafi-ul-Islam High School Malakwal (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please cite sources, if you put them in the reflist they won't show. See WP:REFB.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Government Rafi-ul-Islam High School Malakwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Government Rafi-ul-Islam High School Malakwal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inter-wikilinks

Could you please stop adding inte-wiki links such as this edit. Spike 'em (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still doing this, what are you hoping to achieve here? Spike 'em (talk) 16:19, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bilal. I suspect you are trying to "connect" the English and the Urdu version of the articles. The process you use is not best practice. Here's what should be done: 1) Go to the English article. On the menu list on the left you have a section "Languages". At the bottom of it, click "Edit links". This takes you to "Wikidata". You may need to log in again with our same username and password. 2) On the Wikidata page with all the artifacts, go to the bottom left of the page. There should be a box called "Wikipedia". 3) Click edit in the Wikipedia box. There should be a new blank line of the list of languages. Where it says "wiki", type "ur" and select "Urdu". Where it says "page", type or past the Urdu title of the corresponding page. 4) When done, click "publish" in the top row of the Wikipedia box. That's all. Any questions, pls let me know. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 17:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is your aim, then follow Jake's instructions : I tried this and once I had logged onto wikidata it was reasonably straightforward and I can now see the ur link at the side of ICC T20I Championship. I had never noticed that section before, so didn't figure out this is what you may have been attempting. Spike 'em (talk) 18:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Head Tail cup

Hello, Bilal190023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Head Tail cup.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:27, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nepal vs UAE 2019 Series

Hello, Bilal190023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Nepal vs UAE 2019 Series.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello. If you want to change your username, please do not do so by moving your userpage. Instead, you may make a request at Wikipedia:Changing username. Thank you. EN-Jungwon 16:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly Unblock my IP

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

بلال طاہر (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am an active user of English and Urdu Wikipedia, especially Urdu Wikipedia where you can check out my contributions. I don't know why was I blocked. I was simply editing on cricket pages. Kindly check my last edits and please tell me reason and unblock me. Thanks

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 13:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's my IP address: 119.152.240.15 بلال طاہر (talk) 14:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have confirmed that IP address is a P2P proxy. You can find more information at Template:Blocked p2p proxy. --Yamla (talk) 15:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla What's the solution now? بلال طاہر (talk) 15:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are running any P2P proxies, please tell us which you were running and then disable them. Otherwise, please contact your ISP. --Yamla (talk) 15:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Administrator, Can you please unblock my Wikipedia Account so that I could continue editing. I have been editing Wikipedia using service from same ISP for 2 months and no issue was ever raised. The possible reason of this in my mind is that I recently used a VPN on a browser with my Wikipedia Account logged in there which might have created a P2P proxy. I regularly use Android Wikipedia Beta app for the purpose of editing. No other issue has come to my attention. You can also check my recent contributions especially in Urdu Wikipedia. Thanks! Waiting for your response. بلال طاہر (talk) 13:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my Account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

بلال طاہر (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected Administrator, Can you please unblock my Wikipedia Account so that I could continue editing. I have been editing Wikipedia using service from same ISP for 2 months and no issue was ever raised. The possible reason of this in my mind is that I recently used a VPN on a browser with my Wikipedia Account logged in there which might have created a P2P proxy. I regularly use Android Wikipedia Beta app for the purpose of editing. No other issue has come to my attention. You can also check my recent contributions especially in Urdu Wikipedia. Thanks! Waiting for your response.

My IP address: 119.152.240.15 بلال طاہر (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your account is not blocked. Stop using VPNs, and you should be able to edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock my IP Address

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

بلال طاہر (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Stewards, My IP address was blocked by someone else and I was accused of using a p2p proxy. Recently when I talked about it with an administrator, He replied me that block will end soon but that hasn't yet ended. Kindly Unblock my IP address: 119.152.240.15 on English Wikipedia. You can also see my contributions on English Wikipedia. Thanks! بلال طاہر (talk) 08:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We cannot tell you anything more than what we have. 331dot (talk) 10:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can't You unblock my IP address? بلال طاہر (talk) 10:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are risking a direct block. We will not lift the block on the P2P proxies you are using. Template:Blocked p2p proxy has more details. Please stop making these requests. --Yamla (talk) 10:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lankan women's cricket team in England in 2023 moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Sri Lankan women's cricket team in England in 2023, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Ashraf333 Brother Two administrators visited that page before you and they were satisfied with references and matches of the series. The cricket pages I have recently scene, especially women's cricket pages show same characteristics. Please move that page to published articles. The main independent source of cricket on Wikipedia is only ESPN Cricinfo and other relative sources include cricket boards websites. That article is referenced to both. If you see edit history, you will find another administrator who is mostly involved in Women's Cricket. He was completely satisfied and just put out some grammar mistakes and corrected them himself. Please move that draft to a Published Article. بلال طاہر (talk) 01:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Ashraf333 The Administrator name is Mpk662. Check his list of created articles and check his edit in this article. Of course, he visited much before you and left satisfied. So please move that page to published articles. Women's Cricket pages have been created on Wikipedia same way. Because when a series starts, more news leads to more addition of references. Thanks بلال طاہر (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@بلال طاہر thank you for contributions in Wikipedia. The purpose of sending the page back to draft space is that the page is still WP:TOOSOON and lacks reliable sources as the page is only relying on one source. The editor you mentioned is not an admin and neither am I, but I do have the right to review new pages and have submitted this draft according to Wikipedia's guidelines. However, if you believe that this page should be on the main space, submit it for review now and the reviewer will take a look at it. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Ashraf333 I have done and added more references. Thanks بلال طاہر (talk) 02:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mirza Tahir Baig moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mirza Tahir Baig, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 16:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Silikonz Here's the full version of Pakistani cricketer's Article Mirza Tahir Baig. Check it and remove that draft Article بلال طاہر (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mirza Tahir Baig (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mirza Tahir Baig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Pakistan Super League 2023.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Pakistan Super League 2023.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mirza Tahir Baig for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mirza Tahir Baig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirza Tahir Baig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StickyWicket (talk) 16:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PSL logos

The logos of the PSL teams are only permitted on the articles of the teams themselves, they are not permitted on any other place, as per WP:NFCC. In particular, it is a violation of their copyright to put them on {{2023 Pakistan Super League Points table}}, which is why they have been removed multiple times. Please do not re-add team logos there, as they will just be removed again for copyright reasons. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of AfD header at Mirza Tahir Baig

That's absolutely not OK at all. You simply can't remove an AfD header before the AfD has been closed. I'm surprised you weren't aware of that. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Partial updates on 2023 Indian Premier League

Stop adding partial updates on 2023 Indian Premier League before an innings has finished e.g. [1], [2], [3]. Until the innings has finished, this is unconfirmed and/or incorrect information. The only correct times to update an article for a T20 match is at the change of innings, and end of a match. Wikipedia is not a live score updater, and we don't need the top scorer listed 5 minutes before the end of the innings, like you've been doing. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302 When I updated the scores, it was nearly 5 minutes before the end of Innings. I added the confirmed scores rather than the total. Please don't be so criticizer because in the end scores are fixed correctly. بلال طاہر (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need to do that though, as Wikipedia isn't a place for live updates. Just leave it until the unnings finishes, that's the only acceptable time to update it, as per WikiProject Cricket consensus on the matter. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed today also that he made partial edits across many cricket articles. He also blamed me that I am making partial edits. I noticed that he edits minutes before there is a break in innings and then he states it as confirmed source and all that stuff. MNWiki845 (talk) 17:30, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MNWiki845 I also noticed you yesterday when you made edits on 2023 Indian Premier League page before the time when the innings was actually over. The proofs are in the edit history of page. Why you say your thing correct and my thing wrong. بلال طاہر (talk) 17:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MNWiki845 @Joseph2302 check the edit at 17:47 UTC last afternoon (Wednesday) made by him and now he is making a speech. It is simply dual-faced policy. You stop others and you do yourself. بلال طاہر (talk) 17:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302 Either stop both of us from doing partial score edits and before inning end edits or allow us both. بلال طاہر (talk) 17:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vinod Seshan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vinod Seshan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 Please move that draft from draftspace to Published Article. It has already been reviewed by a number of Users. Remember that a main source of cricket related articles on Wikipedia is ESPN Cricinfo. Your positive response will be appreciated. The page has also been created in other languages on Wikipedia. With the time, various references and citations shall be added to the page. Also check Akshay Totre article which was created by some other user. When cricket related articles are created, they are sufficiently covered by ESPN links and then new information is added as it becomes available on other suitable websites. بلال طاہر (talk) 10:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 I have submitted the draft to get it published. بلال طاہر (talk) 10:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not questioning the validity of the sources, but all three have zero in-depth coverage of this individual. Every article needs to establish GNG, and this one doesn't meet that standard. And I'm not sure where you think it's been "reviewed by a number of Users". I'm the only editor who has reviewed it. I doubt it will get accepted at AfC in its current form. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinod Seshan (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoboCric was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Topic fails WP:NCRIC since the umpire is not part of the Elite Panel of ICC Umpires. Does not meet the requirements of WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG either. It may be notable in near future, but now no.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinod Seshan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RoboCric (talk) 09:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Watts (umpire) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chris Watts (umpire), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vinod Seshan

Hello, بلال طاہر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vinod Seshan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chris Watts (umpire)

Hello, بلال طاہر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chris Watts (umpire), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi بلال طاہر! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Members/Active, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Members/Active.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]