User talk:ErikHaugen
|
 | Sysops, if you are confident that an administrative action I have taken was in error, please feel free to revert it and leave a note on my talk page. If you are not an administrator, please leave a note on my talk page or go to WP:AN if more urgency is required. |
|
|||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New administrator activity requirement
[edit]The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Seo_(surname)
[edit]Hi, as you closed the move request there, I am attempting to discuss this before opening a full review. I think the article should be split, moved to Seo (Korean surname) and the Japanese part should be moved out to Seo (Japanese surname). It is entire unreasonable to discuss the Japanese surname in the same article when they are not related, the only thing is that they coincidentally have the same spelling in latin letter renditions. They even have widely different pronunciations, Korean Seo is pronounced [so], while Japanese Seo is pronounced [s-e-o]. The names are not related in any ways and thus the article may confuse readers. Therefore nothing really warrants why these two names should be discussed under one article just because of the same Latin spelling... Xia talk to me 11:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- There seemed to be consensus there that there shouldn't be two separate articles, but who knows maybe opinions have changed. Anyway: feel free to open a new discussion. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 01:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Tigray move
[edit]Hi, I don't think my message in Talk:Tigray (disambiguation)#Requested move 30 September 2023 was interpreted correctly - this was an argument against the move, and it wasn't addressed or refuted by anyone. Can you revert and relist it instead, please? --Joy (talk) 14:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, I think I did, beg pardon. No, I'm not going to relist it, I think the close probably stands. FF to start another request. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:44, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- With so little participation in the original round, adding more bureaucracy is not likely to be helpful... --Joy (talk) 12:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Always precious
[edit]
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,