User talk:Paradisetheory

AfD nomination of Holistic view

Holistic view, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Holistic view satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holistic view and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Holistic view during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eliz81 ^(talk)^(contribs) 07:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Holistic view, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Dbromage [Talk] 08:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rationality of sexuality, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dbromage [Talk] 06:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Evil are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 11:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages

Are supposed to be used for talking about ways to contribute to the article. They're not supposed to be used for chatting about the article's subject (WP:NOT). Thanks. 24.76.161.28 (talk) 10:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]