User talk:Deogratias5

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Deogratias5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Taelus (talk) 16:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: your message

Hi Deogratias5, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 16:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deogratias5, I've left you another reply on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 16:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Shawnhatosyfarright.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shawnhatosyfarright.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Deogratias5. You have new messages at Discospinster's talk page.
Message added 16:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Enya, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. SummerPhD (talk) 18:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Enya shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Reverting without discussing the issue or bothering with an edit summary? Wow. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. SummerPhD (talk) 23:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to engage in the discussion here rather than reverting, breach of policy. 14:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Enya. If you restore the category again without discussing the issue on the article's talk page, you will be blocked from editing. Additionally, do not make personal attacks in edit summaries (or anywhere else) on Wikipedia. Please review WP:NPA. SummerPhD (talk) 16:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Religious categories

Please consider this a final warning. If you continue to add religious categories to biography articles without ensuring that the requirements of WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS are met you will be blocked from editing. In order for a religious category to be included, the category must be supported by reliably sourced content and you need to show evidence of self-identification. If other editors disagree with the inclusion of the category you need to get consensus for its inclusion prior to restoring it. Finally, the personal attacks you have used in your edit summaries are completely unacceptable. You need to be able to express your opinion on a matter without attacking others.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 15:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

Deogratias5, I've blocked your account for 48 hours. I suggest you stop edit warring on the Enya article. Have a look at the dispute resolution page for information on how disputes should be resolved. If after the block expires, you continue to edit war, then you could be blocked for a longer period of time. PhilKnight (talk) 10:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]