User talk:Blades95

Welcome

My name is Λua∫Wi se and I have been on Wikipedia for sometime now. I have been wandering around when I saw your name and decided to drop by to see if you need help with Wikipedia. I have also attached this list of some links that might help you:

You should also note that you have to sign your comments by using four of those ~ at the end of your messages (i.e. ~~~~, this will simply place your user name and date; see my signature at the end of this message as an example.)
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have a question or require help with Wikipedia, you can leave me a new message here.
P.S. Some new users find editing Wikipedia a bit difficult at first, but it only seems this way. In fact it is quite easy to get used to editing it and actually finding that enjoyable ! :)
Good luck! :)

Λua∫Wi se ^{(Operibus anteire)} 15:28, 15 June 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Murder of Brian Deneke

You "moved" the article to "Brian Deneke". First off, you tried to move the page by cut-and paste instead of using the Wikipedia functionality. More importantly, please discuss each move on the article talk page beforehand (feel free to take this there). I also noticed that you've been advised and warned about this thing several times in the past (complete with links and instructions on how it works). Please heed the friendly advice, thanks. Averell (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Lepine

You have made some very helpful edits to the article. Thank you. But I remain however, concerned at the fact that in your edits you continue to add unsourced material into the article. Nowhere, for example, in Lepine's book, does she say that he admired Hitler "for his leadership and perseverance". Maybe you have another reference for this; if so, that's fine and please add it. If not, it is most inappropriate to add your own thoughts about what he admired, and make it appear to be sourced. I have warned you several times about this. Please consider this your final warning about this matter. If you don't pay heed, you may find your editing privileges restricted in the future. --Slp1 (talk) 03:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move

I'd question the move to Jimmy Carter assassination plot, since the title implies it was a legitimate plot, whereas the article about the drifter makes it clear that some considered it to be "a tale spun by an intoxicated man". I'd recommend a move back to its original name. Sherurcij ^{(speaker for the dead)} 00:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Beach drifter (talk) 00:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Benjamin Darras. Blank pages are malicious to Wikipedia as they often confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the deletion process for how to proceed. P Carn (talk) 00:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference for Fort Hood Victims List

Here is a useful reference for List of Fort Hood shooting victims: Fort Hood Victims List. Supertouch (talk) 00:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Teena - March 2010

When making edits to an article please try to make small changes in each individual edit. You're recent edit to Brandon Teena contains as many as two dozen separate edits, making this many changes in a single edit can make it very difficult to tell what changes you've made or to revert changes that other editors feel are inappropriate and is otherwise generally disruptive to the process of colaborative editing. In the future please consider making multiple smaller edits and include an edit summary to make it easier for other editors to see what you've done. Voiceofreason01 (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hip hop, you may be blocked from editing. Dave Dial (talk) 01:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Barack Obama and George W. Bush you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DCmacnut <> 02:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for your account is either compromised or you are using it only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lindhurst High School shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lindhurst High School shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindhurst High School shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind _talk 14:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]