User talk:PrivateMasterHD

VGPHD, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi VGPHD! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for a pattern of disruptive editing as established at ANI. Once the issues that have led to the block have been addressed, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PrivateMasterHD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Apologies for disruptive editing/edit warring. PrivateMasterHD (talk) 22:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If we unblocked everyone who just said that they were sorry, just for saying that they were sorry, we'd wind up making a lot more blocks than we already do. — Daniel Case (talk) 21:06, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit warring is not a concern here, and you haven't addressed how you plan to avoid a repetition of the behavior that led to the block. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PrivateMasterHD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I shouldn't be doing. No more disruptive editing. I admitted that I was the one who corrected the protection templates although that's not always allowed. I'm trying to be more mature so I don't get in trouble. And I won't create multiple accounts that consider any Ditto transformations or sock puppets. PrivateMasterHD (talk) 5:21 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Recent sockpuppetry, plus the removal of comments by other users relating to this block from your talkpage ([1], [2]) don't exactly inspire me with confidence that unblocking you would be a positive step for Wikipedia. At this point, I think the standard offer may be appropriate, to give you some time to gain maturity and demonstrate that you can refrain from sockpuppetry. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:44, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why? I thought this was a site where you could edit articles in case there are outdated or whatever. Fine, I give up. (Redacted) AND I HOPE TO SUE YOU ONE DAY!!! PrivateMasterHD (talk) 13:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked your talkpage access on the basis of the above comment. I've also redacted your offensive remarks, although I have left the legal threat visible for future reference. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:29, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]