Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus.jpg

Reason: Good quality and EV. Similar colour with that of ground where it is usually found may also illustrate camouflage.
Articles this image appears in: Hypolimnas, Hypolimnas misippus
Creator: Muhammad

Support as nominator --Muhammad(talk) 14:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Durova^Charge! 04:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately this leaves me squinting. The wings are soft and the body is dark and doesn't contrast with the background. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, the wings don't stand out too well, but they're supposed to be camouflaged, so I can't complain there. Very nice picture. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The wings are soft, they stand out very well. It is the body that doesn't, and that is just a function of lighting imo. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Noodle snacks. It also doesn't illustrate its camouflage particularly well due to the shallow DOF. I'm sure that different lighting or another background would produce a superior image and for easily replicated shots that is enough for me to oppose. --Leivick (talk) 18:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. I think the whole camouflage issue is trivial. ~ ωαdεstεr16_{♣kiss me}^{i'm Irish♣} 02:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus.jpg --Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]