Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Garlic Bulbs 2.jpg
Appearance
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/Garlic_Bulbs_2.jpg/250px-Garlic_Bulbs_2.jpg)
- Reason
- Figured I better get in on a food nom or two before fir takes them all :P
- Articles this image appears in
- Garlic
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 02:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Similar to the feta shot I don't like the "floating" effect of the lack of "support" shadows. Also for EV I'd like to see a cross section --Fir0002 07:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- The one on the right is pretty close to a cross section, fair enough on the shadows, but at the same time I fail to see how white on white will have any contrast/background separation (applies to this and the cheese). Noodle snacks (talk) 09:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's close but there's no reason (for a studio shot) why it couldn't have included a cross section. I agree a white background probably wouldn't work too well, I'd probably recommend going for a kitchen cutting board such as in this shot --Fir0002 11:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- The one on the right is pretty close to a cross section, fair enough on the shadows, but at the same time I fail to see how white on white will have any contrast/background separation (applies to this and the cheese). Noodle snacks (talk) 09:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose No problem with the black here, nor the lighting particularly, just content: OOF clove up front, messy arrangement, not a good illustration of the whole bulb. Yes, it'd be a tricky subject on white, pity you didn't spend more time on it on black, I guess. mikaultalk 12:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose a wooden chopping board is a good idea. The shape of the bulb isn't shown here. If one were standing on its base with the stalk pointing up, it would be better, I think. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn --Noodle snacks (talk) 04:23, 31 January 2009 (UTC)