Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Uluguru Mountain Ranges.jpg

Uluguru Mountain Ranges

Original - A panorama illustrating the Uluguru Mountains in Morogoro, Tanzania. The mountains' peak is at 2,630m

Edit 1 - A panorama illustrating the Uluguru Mountains in Morogoro, Tanzania. The mountains' peak is at 2,630m

Reason: Good quality, EV and res. Better in temrs of composition and EV compared to this Valued Picture. Already featured at commons
Articles in which this image appears: Uluguru Mountains
Creator: Muhammad Mahdi Karim

Support as nominator --Muhammad(talk) 19:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems better than its replacement. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better then the replacement image, clear good shot of the mountains, could of been less cloudy but that isn't enough of a flaw to oppose on. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 02:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support great panorama, really captures the range. -- Jack?! 03:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo with lots of EV Nick-D (talk) 08:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, so what now becomes of the VP that is no longer in an article? This is undoubtedly an improvement, but is that an auto-delist? --jjron (talk) 18:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably need delisted, but I donno if there is even a procedure for that at VP... Basically a dead project anyway though. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 18:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't believe there is a delist procedure at VP. My original proposal included auto-delisting, but that was more for if a VP subsequently got featured, rather than a substitute. --jjron (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice shot, appears to have good encyclopedic value. Cat-five - talk 03:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all... Gazhiley (talk) 00:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I recolored the image for a little more contrast and saturation. What does everyone think? —mono 04:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks different and unrealistic IMO --Muhammad(talk) 18:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on the edit, please. Which do we prefer? Makeemlighter (talk) 22:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original Edit's lighting looks fake, to warm imho. — raeky T 22:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree the edit's colors are a bit too warm. I prefer the original. Jujutacular ^T · C 23:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Uluguru_Mountain_Ranges.jpg --I'ḏ ♥One 02:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The support seems to be for the original. --I'ḏ ♥One 02:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]