Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Platycercus eximius diemenensis.jpg

Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 10:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Although it would be nice to see it in a more natural environment. Is that a juvenile by the way?, or just a different variant to what we get up in Victoria? I've never seen that colouring before. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 11:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It is the tasmanian subspecies, which is a tad fatter, and the white cheek patches are bigger, among other things. File:Platycercus eximius diemenensis juvinile.jpg is a P. e. diemenensis juvenile. Main difference is lighter plumage and smaller. Noodle snacks (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gone from Rosella article. --jjron (talk) 12:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rationale in the edit summary was image aspect ratio, rather than something wrong with the image. Noodle snacks (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yep, why I linked to the edit. An example of why edit summaries are useful. --jjron (talk) 07:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak Support~~ Cute, but not the highest EV, and not the best background. Nezzadar ☎ 13:59, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per above and the blurry back leg. Nezzadar ☎ 16:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Durova³³³ 20:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Meets the criteria, and bonus points for the motion and capturing of "personality". Maedin\^talk 06:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. meets criteria. ~ Arjun 20:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Platycercus eximius diemenensis.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 23:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]