Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Lists of UEFA club competition winning managers
I prematurely nominated this as a featured topic candidate before it was politely pointed out I'd missed an entire UEFA competition, despite sitting pretty with six supports here. Well, I've gone back to the drawing board, worked with User:Struway2 to get the Intertoto Cup list up to FL and now the topic is ready to go, with a minor rename. All articles in this proposed featured topic are featured lists. The main page for the topic is an accurate and well illustrated overview of the child lists. The statistics are double-checked by the use of decent secondary sources and all child lists are well referenced and also illustrated. Overall I think the consistent style across all five lists, along with the references and images makes this an ideal candidate for a featured topic. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support I supported the last nom, so with the addition of the Intertoto cup I offer my support once again. Well done NapHit (talk) 18:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support Great job on getting another featured list in that short a time. Zginder 2008-04-14T18:47Z (UTC)
- Popped in from wikibreak just to Support --Dweller (talk) 21:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support - complete, comprehensive, and well constructed. Nice work. I would look to see one change, though: on the Intertoto list I'd like to see the year cells merged, as at the moment it's unnessecarily repeating wikilinks and makes it hard to distinguish between some of the 1980s/1990s years. I've removed the refs to keep this page clean, but something like this:
| 1995 | 
|
Jacky Duguépéroux |
|
RC Strasbourg | |
|
Slavoljub Muslin |
|
FC Girondins de Bordeaux |
Other than that it's a solid topic. Regards, AllynJ (talk | contribs) 21:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry to sound cheeky AllynJ but no can do. Using rowspan in this way will mess up the sortability of the table. If you know of a way for it not to destroy the sortability then please go for it, otherwise I'm going to leave it as it is. I understand it makes it slightly less clear but I'd prefer sortability (and consistency with all the other lists) in this case. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Re Support - After a completeness check, it is all set for Featured topic status! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support It seems like a pile-on support, but it still meets the criteria, I supported the earlier FT nomination, and I also gave comments and supported every Featured List. Nice work, TRM. -- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ• @ 07:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support Great job on this topic! Gary King (talk) 08:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support Full topic now it would seem. Good work. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support Credit should go to the nominator for accepting that the topic as previously nominated was in fact incomplete, despite the support it had already received, and putting in the work needed to make it complete. (For complete disclosure I should say I helped a bit with the referencing of the Intertoto list.) Now the topic is complete I'm happy to support. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:25, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support - Fantastic set of articles, and well worthy of featured topic status. – PeeJay 14:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Consensus to promote --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 21:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)