Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/The Simpsons (season 9)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main page Articles
The Simpsons (season 9) The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson The Principal and the Pauper Lisa's Sax Treehouse of Horror VIII The Cartridge Family Bart Star The Two Mrs. Nahasapeemapetilons Lisa the Skeptic Realty Bites Miracle on Evergreen Terrace All Singing, All Dancing Bart Carny The Joy of Sect Das Bus The Last Temptation of Krust Dumbbell Indemnity Lisa the Simpson This Little Wiggy Simpson Tide The Trouble with Trillions Girly Edition Trash of the Titans King of the Hill Lost Our Lisa Natural Born Kissers

Every episode article (except one) from this season is of GA status or higher. The Joy of Sect and Lisa the Skeptic are both FAs, The Simpsons (season 9) is an FL and every other page is a GA, with the exception of The Principal and the Pauper, which is currently a GAC. -- Scorpion0422 23:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Co-nominators: Xihix, Gran2, Cirt and Ctjf83

The Simpsons (season 8) passed when there was still a GAC, I believe. xihix(talk) 00:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For more info on the Season 8 discussion, see Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/The Simpsons (season 8). Cirt (talk) 18:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For the record Season 8 only passed after all the articles were GA or higher. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 19:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And they all are for Season 9, save for The Principal and the Pauper, which is currently at WP:GAC and will (hopefully) be reviewed and listed as a GA soon. Cirt (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could they have waited? Sure, but they're here now and "The Principal and the Pauper" will probably be promoted to GA. –thedemonhog talkedits 02:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To set the record straight, My Sister, My Sitter wasn't even a GAC when we nominated season 8, but it was promoted after a couple of weeks. -- Scorpion0422 03:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am changing my vote to abstain, as I have no reason to oppose anymore, but dislike the conflict of interest, and similar things, I think might have been used. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 18:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clarify, I do not feel comfortable voting support for this, but I have no complaints to oppose. I do not have any accusation against anyone. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 01:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]