Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 April 1
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 April 1)
April 1
[edit]
- - uploaded by Hammersmith123 (notify | contribs).
- UE, CV - even though this is listed as PD-self, it appears to be a photoshopped screenshot from a film. As such, it violates our fair use guidelines since it is not used in any articles. — Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 00:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- OE, Unencyclopedic, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by DickClarkMises (notify | contribs).
- Obsolete by Image:Gun owners of america.jpg Nv8200p talk 01:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for identification of previous logo. Yakuman (数え役満) 06:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by SenorAnderson (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by SenorAnderson (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Doubtful uploader is copyright holder as tagged. Nv8200p talk 01:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, User's only contribution Nv8200p talk 01:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only contribution Nv8200p talk 01:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Shadowcrystal (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- I know wp is not censored, but this is completely unneccesary — PumeleonT 04:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC).
- I know wp is not censored, but this is completely unneccesary — PumeleonT 04:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC).
- - uploaded by EEMeltonIV (notify | contribs).
- Image I created before understanding WP:OR -- image is a speculative fictional rank insignia not (now) used by any article. — EEMeltonIV 07:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Roslin.png obsoleted by Image:Roslin.jpg — EEMeltonIV 07:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Image is from scifi.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LifeStar (talk • contribs) 13:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 09:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- This is listed as a promotional image but the BBC website does not provide any information on use of these images. It also has no FU rationale — WindsorFan 13:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep; fair use. Publicity images are intended for publicity.
- - uploaded by Amarjeet 420 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Maybe Copyright violation, User's only contribution Nv8200p talk 13:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic?, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 13:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Giovannisperanza (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 13:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Giovannisperanza (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 14:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Giovannisperanza (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 14:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Giovannisperanza (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 14:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Likely copyright violation. The camera's point of view is impossible for a fan, so unless this guy works for the Associated Press, this is probably a copyvio. From his talk page, he has a history of bad images. — Wafulz 15:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Obvious copyvio. Copyright tags from Getty and the NHL still there. — Wafulz 15:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Hartioelfke (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 15:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by JonathonReinhart (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality Nv8200p talk 16:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Beyondce728 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 16:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mariamarcen (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, Copyvio, all others in series (miriam2.jpg, miriam3.jpg, miriam4.jpg) already db'd and IfD'd. This one got missed. — Jokestress 17:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC).
- - uploaded by Emericask8ter193 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic, no contributions by user since upload User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 18:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by MusiCitizen (notify | contribs).
- Image:White-Sox-logo1.gif obsoleted by Image:Chicago White Sox Logo.svg — Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 20:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- The SVG file seems to violate the criteria for fair use, specifically criterion #3 that "Low-resolution images should be used instead of high-resolution images (especially images that are so high-resolution that they could be used for piracy)." If I am missing something, tell me; in the event that I am not, delete the SVG file and keep the PNG file. --Iamunknown 19:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Silent Wind of Doom (notify | contribs).
- Image:ALWhiteSoxLogo2.PNG obsoleted by Image:Chicago White Sox Logo.svg — Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 20:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Image:ALWhiteSoxLogo2.PNG was created to replace the SVG file for use in the White Sox infobox. The SVG file looks horrible aesthetically in that place. Silent Wind of Doom 04:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- The SVG file seems to violate the criteria for fair use, specifically criterion #3 that "Low-resolution images should be used instead of high-resolution images (especially images that are so high-resolution that they could be used for piracy)." If I am missing something, tell me; in the event that I am not, delete the SVG file and keep the PNG file. --Iamunknown 19:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- The SVG can be made smaller if that is a problem. I was under the impression that SVG was preferable to PNG. — Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 04:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- You are correct that SVG is preferred when dealing with digital images that are representations or composites of geometric figures. The problem as I see it is that SVG files, since they are in a vector format, can be scaled to very large proportions without any loss of quality (inasmuch as the file is formatted correctly). Thus, even though they are superior in quality, they fail criterion #3. --Iamunknown 05:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- The SVG can be made smaller if that is a problem. I was under the impression that SVG was preferable to PNG. — Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 04:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
