Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 May 18
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 May 18)
May 18
[edit]
- Obsolete. JPG format map. Replaced with a better quality PNG soon after upload due to own forgetfulness. (Self upload) — Bnynms 01:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan. I didn't realize there was an automatic copy-to-WM-Commons process so I soon replaced this image by manually copying it to Wikimedia Commons under the name Image:LocationMap_JP-Mie-Ise.png. The article now links to the new one on Commons so the one stored Wikipedia can be safely deleted. (Self upload)
- Nonfree image of record album cover used to illustrate the artist generally, not the album. — Butseriouslyfolks 03:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- ArchonMeld (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image is in JPG and unofficial colors, as stated by UCSD's graphics guidelines. Superceded by Image:UCSD Seal.png. — ALTON .ıl 07:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- ArchonMeld (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Low quality, unofficial logo. Superceded by Image:UCSD logo.png — ALTON .ıl 07:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- ArchonMeld (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unoficial logo, low quality. Superceded by Image:UCSD Tritons.png — ALTON .ıl 07:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, no encyclopaedic value. — Madmedea 10:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- Orphan, any potential encyclopaedic value is undermined by not know who is in the image! — Madmedea 10:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- redtheidiot (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- vandal image and uncyclopedic — Janarius 13:22, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- no rationale given, non-encyclopedic and image's article is being speedied delete — Janarius 13:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- user-created image that displays a copyrighted Pokemon character — tiZom(2¢) 14:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Suvie 1990 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- The image was originally uploaded by me as "Image:Muslim-country-women-kashmir1890.jpg". The uploader, simply changed the name of the image, because s/he feels that the women in the picture are not Muslim, but rather Hindu. However, in my view, this action by the uploader (at the very least) constitutes original research. I have since removed both images from the article Kashmir region — Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- Hindu can be a religion OR an ethnicity (Like Jew, which can be ambiguous sometimes.) They are definitely ethnic Hindus, and possibly religious Hindus. Neutral on deletion. Nardman1 20:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted - duplicate images can be speedied I1. --BigDT 05:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Stephenwilliams (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, poor quality and no encyclopaedic value — Madmedea 15:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Stephenwilliams (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, poor quality and no encyclopaedic value — Madmedea 15:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alfred anu (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, not encyclopaedic — Madmedea 15:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Georgeandlewis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, not encyclopaedic — Madmedea 15:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Replaced with a smaller sized version at Image:Beastastonishing.jpg in view of this guideline. This leaves this png file effectively orphaned. — J Greb 17:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Replaced with a smaller sized version at Image:Darkbeast.jpg in view of this guideline. This leaves this png file effectively orphaned. — J Greb 17:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Tagged as PD-USGov-Military-AirForce, but image doesn't come from a USAF site, nor does the source page give a credit, so there's no reason to assume it's from the USAF. howcheng {chat} 18:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- There is no replacement available. So I do not understand your objection.--Cerejota 19:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is true, this image is incorrectly tagged. However, the source is a press release photo from a website, which is fair-use. I am retagging and that should be the end of it.--Cerejota 15:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, now it fails WP:NFCC #1 for being replaceable fair use. howcheng {chat} 21:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with User:Cerejota above. The image is fair-use and has now been properly tagged. Tony the Marine 17:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - no reason to use an unfree image of a living person. --Abu badali (talk) 18:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan; unencyclopedic — Closenplay 20:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- Strong keep image is not orphaned, check the file links bit. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 15:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned bad-faith image clearly uploaded only to be disruptive to Wiki and insulting to some chap in the real world. — Ford MF 21:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- I arranged for it's speedy deletion as an attack page. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 22:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- TempeBrennan (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyvio - tagged as free but no ascertion of this has been provided, and a link shows where it came from but doesn't show it to be freely released either. — Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- TempeBrennan (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyvio - tagged as free but no ascertion of this has been provided, and a link shows where it came from but doesn't show it to be freely released either. — Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- Non-free screenshot used in 4 articles. In all cases, it does not expand the reader's understanding in a way that words alone cannot. Thus, the image fails WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 21:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Please do not delete this image. A detailed fair use rationale has been given. The image is of a low resolution and is a television screenshot. Yes, the event itself can be described, but the picture illustrates Erhard's appearance on the program far better than just words could. Smee 13:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC).
- How so? It's just his face on the Larry King show. The text, "Erhard appeared on Larry King Live as a guest" accomplishes the same thing. howcheng {chat} 21:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not what he looked like at the time, his facial expressions, these are highly relevant and helpful/illustrative in the article. Smee 00:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC).
- Really? Because I just read all four articles and nowhere does it make any note about his appearance or facial expressions that would require this specific image in order for the reader to understand it better. In fact, with regards to this particular broadcast, what's more noted is the fact that Werner Erhard's brother called in. Do any of these articles need this image in the way that Billy Ripken needs its baseball card image so that you can see where the F-word is hidden? No. But it makes the articles look nicer, which makes it decorative. howcheng {chat} 01:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- You are correct, the articles themselves do not refer to facial expressions or the like, it is the image itself that brings across this info. But I would argue that it is not simply decorative, it's useful in the articles as stated above. I will hold further comments and wait to hear what others think. Smee 05:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC).
- Really? Because I just read all four articles and nowhere does it make any note about his appearance or facial expressions that would require this specific image in order for the reader to understand it better. In fact, with regards to this particular broadcast, what's more noted is the fact that Werner Erhard's brother called in. Do any of these articles need this image in the way that Billy Ripken needs its baseball card image so that you can see where the F-word is hidden? No. But it makes the articles look nicer, which makes it decorative. howcheng {chat} 01:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not what he looked like at the time, his facial expressions, these are highly relevant and helpful/illustrative in the article. Smee 00:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC).
- How so? It's just his face on the Larry King show. The text, "Erhard appeared on Larry King Live as a guest" accomplishes the same thing. howcheng {chat} 21:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- ReneKMueller (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Non-free film screenshot used in 4 articles. In all cases, the image does not increase the reader's understanding in a way that words alone cannot. Thus its usage fails WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 21:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - This is a very low resolution image, depicting actor Bert Convy, made up to parody Werner Erhard. It is a screenshot from a film. Though it can be described how Convy was made up to look like Erhard for the film, this is best illustrated with a low resolution picture. However, at a later point in time if a better screenshot from the same film could be used instead, depicting more of a scene, that would be preferable. Smee 13:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC).
- A better image for this purpose would be to show Convy as Erhard compared to a picture of the real Erhard so that the reader could see the similarities. By itself, the image is unable to accomplish this goal. howcheng {chat} 21:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- That would be a difficult feat, but one which perhaps may be done in the future. Smee 00:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC).
- A better image for this purpose would be to show Convy as Erhard compared to a picture of the real Erhard so that the reader could see the similarities. By itself, the image is unable to accomplish this goal. howcheng {chat} 21:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- SaqibChaudhry (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned. Also, either a copyvio or spam (maybe both) — Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- Orphaned, spammy adverting duplicate of Image:M100 wiki-2.jpg. Possible copyvio. User asserts he/she is the creator, while also listing it as copyright Neoware corporation (which the user maybe is representing, so possible WP:COI). — Ford MF 21:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nibruteceer (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, unnenencyclopedic — Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned, unencyclopaedic — Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 22:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- Deepa.kushwaha (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned and definatly not user created. — Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 22:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- No objection here to the deletion. Darcyj 01:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned — Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 22:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- orphaned — Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 22:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC).
- Orphaned banner BigrTex 23:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned banner BigrTex 23:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- This non-free book cover is used in the Dan Rather article, but there is no critical commentary about the cover itself. Nor does its use expand the reader's understanding in a way that word alone cannot. Thus, its usage fails WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 23:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Namit coro (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 23:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Melvyn bading (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 23:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)