Wikipedia:Peer review/Mind MGMT/archive1

Mind MGMT

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I hope to move it up the quality ladder. Aside from one edit, I'm the only editor who's contributed, so I may have blinders on to any missing or redundant content. Help in any area would be appreciated.

Thanks, Argento Surfer (talk) 21:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Image caption, I think per WP:HASH we tend to avoid using the hash symbol to represent "number". Check that throughout, I think it's common in comic articles to use the hash character, but our MOS seems to frown upon it.
Don't overlink in the info box (e.g. you link Kindt twice).
You have a single ref in the lead, I'd suggest that since the lead is a summary of the main article, you can move the ref to the relevant part of the main article where this fact is expanded upon.
Check for compliance with WP:DASH on number ranges.
"first issue was released in May 23, 2012" vs "The first issue was published May 25, 2012," so the first sentence fragment is grammatically incorrect, and the two fragments contradict one another.
" Comicbookresources.com" why not just Comic Book Resources which your link redirects to anyway?
Refs need, as a minimum:
- Title.
- Accessdate (for online links).
- Publisher.
- Language (if not English) and whether subscription is required to access the information.
Where possible, links should also include:
- Publication date.
- Work.
- Author name.
Odd mix of italics in the refs.
Don't SHOUT in ref titles.
Use en-dash where appropriate in ref titles.
You have DMY date format in the refs, but MDY in the main body. Any reason for the difference?

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. The hash mark for comic issues is an exception for MOS:HASH. I fixed the various dashes and corrected the date for the first issue release. I filled out the references with the criteria you listed. The access dates aren't all the days I originally looked at them, but they're all active today. The italic refs are the titles of published works, everything else is just the name of an article. The book's title is "MIND MGMT," with all caps. I changed some of the text (and article title) to reflect this. There was no reason for the change in date presentation, so I made them uniform. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]